The New York Times claims Trump aided crypto firms. Industry voices expose years of bipartisan rejection of Biden-era policies that courts repeatedly struck downThe New York Times claims Trump aided crypto firms. Industry voices expose years of bipartisan rejection of Biden-era policies that courts repeatedly struck down

Crypto Escaped Regulatory Assault, Not Favoritism

The New York Times claims Trump aided crypto firms. Industry voices expose years of bipartisan rejection of Biden-era policies that courts repeatedly struck down.

The New York Times dropped a bombshell investigation. The SEC pulled back 60% of crypto cases under Trump. Eight involved firms with Trump ties. The narrative suggests that favoritism drove the shift.

Crypto insiders erupted immediately. According to @intangiblecoins on X, the framing relies on false premises. The prior administration’s attack wasn’t normal. It was widely condemned.

Crypto Escaped Regulatory Assault, Not Favoritism

Source – X

The Times documented SEC retreats on major cases. Gemini, Binance, and Ripple saw enforcement ease. The report connected dots between Trump family ventures and dropped prosecutions. The implication seemed clear.

But context matters critically here. Biden’s approach faced fierce bipartisan opposition. Federal courts ruled against SEC overreach repeatedly. Congress voted to overturn policies. Biden vetoed the resolution anyway.

You might also like: JD Vance Proclaims Operation Chokepoint 2.0 Over at Bitcoin 2025

The Warren Machine Behind Policy

@intangiblecoins detailed the real story on X. Elizabeth Warren shaped Biden’s regulatory appointments. The 2020 campaign deal received wide coverage. Warren-aligned officials filled crucial positions.

These appointees cycled between agencies and advocacy groups. Better Markets and the Consumer Federation of America employed former staffers. Banking regulators targeted legal crypto businesses systematically.

The Senate voted overwhelmingly against SAB 121. Twenty-one Democrats broke with Biden. Mainstream party members never embraced Warren’s crusade. The isolation proved telling.

Paul Grewal leads Coinbase’s legal team. @iampaulgrewal shared findings on X from their FDIC investigation. Documents revealed coordinated debanking efforts. Over twenty examples surfaced.

You might also like: Ripple CTO Slams Operation Chokepoint 2.0 Threat

Courts Rejected Regulation By Enforcement

Federal judges sided with crypto repeatedly. The Grayscale decision embarrassed regulators. Courts found SEC interpretations lacked legal foundation. Eighteen states sued over administrative overreach.

@iampaulgrewal addressed the Times report directly on X. He appreciated one reporter’s candor. The online version included critical admissions. No evidence showed White House pressure on firms.

Crypto Escaped Regulatory Assault, Not Favoritism

Source – X

Companies didn’t influence cases through donations. Trump family ties proved irrelevant. The headline twisted facts anyway.

The Times ignored four years of documented attacks. Warren’s partisans drove the assault. Presidential interest didn’t cause the reversal. Prior regulatory posture was legally indefensible.

Why The Narrative Shift Now

The Times investigation emerged as crypto gained legitimacy. Trump launched memecoin ventures. His family invested in mining operations. The Winklevoss twins backed American Bitcoin.

These connections provided narrative ammunition. But timing matters here. The SEC lost in court before Trump returned. Congress rejected Warren’s agenda during Biden’s term.

@intangiblecoins noted how reporting exploits reader ignorance. Gell-Mann Amnesia enables distorted framing. People trust institutional media instinctively. Context disappears from coverage.

The pullback reflected legal and constitutional limits. Courts enforce those boundaries. Regulators can’t ignore adverse rulings. Congress demonstrated bipartisan opposition clearly.

Marc Andreessen disclosed widespread debanking. Thirty tech founders lost accounts. Crypto executives faced similar treatment. Banking access vanished without explanation.

Operation Chokepoint 2.0 coordinated these efforts. FDIC letters pressured financial institutions. Banks received orders to pause crypto services. The campaign targeted legal businesses.

Warren’s appointees executed this strategy. They cycled between government and advocacy. The revolving door spun predictably. Entrenched officials resisted change.

The Times’ narrative ignores these realities. It frames correction as corruption. Legal developments become suspiciously timed. Bipartisan rejection transforms into partisan favoritism.

@intangiblecoins called it crypto dementia. The industry remembers what happened. Courts documented regulatory overreach. Congress voted against it. Those facts remain unchanged.

The post Crypto Escaped Regulatory Assault, Not Favoritism appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Notcoin Logosu
Notcoin Fiyatı(NOT)
$0.0005247
$0.0005247$0.0005247
-3.04%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon?

BitcoinWorld Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? The financial world is buzzing with discussions around the future of monetary policy, and a recent statement from a key Federal Reserve official has added fuel to the fire. Investors, businesses, and consumers alike are keenly watching for signals regarding potential Fed interest rate cuts and their broader economic implications. What’s Driving Talk of Fed Interest Rate Cuts? Neel Kashkari, the president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, recently made headlines by stating his belief that two additional Fed interest rate cuts would be appropriate this year. This isn’t the first time Kashkari has shared this perspective; he expressed a similar view back in August. His comments offer a glimpse into the ongoing internal debates and varying outlooks among policymakers regarding the optimal path for the nation’s economy. Understanding the context behind such statements is crucial. The Federal Reserve uses interest rates as a primary tool to manage inflation and support employment. When inflation is high, the Fed typically raises rates to cool down economic activity. Conversely, when economic growth slows or inflation targets are met, the Fed might consider cutting rates to stimulate spending and investment. How Do Fed Interest Rate Cuts Impact You? The prospect of Fed interest rate cuts carries significant weight for everyone. For instance, lower interest rates generally translate to: Cheaper Borrowing: Mortgages, car loans, and credit card interest rates can decrease, making it more affordable for consumers to borrow money. This can encourage home buying and larger purchases. Business Investment: Companies find it less expensive to borrow for expansion, new projects, and hiring, potentially boosting economic growth and job creation. Stock Market Performance: Lower rates can make bonds less attractive, pushing investors towards stocks, which might see increased valuations. This can also signal a more optimistic economic outlook. Savings Account Returns: On the flip side, interest rates on savings accounts and Certificates of Deposit (CDs) might also fall, offering lower returns for savers. These ripple effects touch various sectors, from housing to retail, and even extend into the cryptocurrency markets, where investor sentiment is often influenced by broader economic conditions and liquidity. Navigating the Economic Landscape: Why Are Policymakers Divided on Fed Interest Rate Cuts? While some policymakers, like Kashkari, see the appropriateness of multiple Fed interest rate cuts, others may hold different views. The Federal Reserve’s decisions are complex, balancing the need to control inflation with the goal of maintaining maximum employment. Key factors influencing these decisions include: Inflation Data: The pace at which inflation is returning to the Fed’s 2% target is a primary concern. Sustained progress is needed. Employment Figures: A strong job market might give the Fed more leeway to keep rates higher for longer, whereas signs of weakness could prompt cuts. Global Economic Conditions: International economic trends and geopolitical events can also influence the Fed’s domestic policy decisions. Market Expectations: The Fed also considers how financial markets are pricing in future rate movements, aiming to avoid undue volatility. The path forward is rarely straightforward, and the Fed’s approach is often described as data-dependent, meaning decisions can shift as new economic information becomes available. The Outlook for Future Fed Interest Rate Cuts Kashkari’s consistent view on two Fed interest rate cuts this year provides an important perspective, but it’s essential to remember that he is one voice among many on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The committee as a whole determines monetary policy through a consensus-driven process. As the year progresses, market participants will be closely monitoring upcoming inflation reports, employment data, and official Fed statements for further clarity. The timing and magnitude of any potential rate adjustments will significantly shape the economic environment, influencing everything from investment strategies to everyday household budgets. In summary: Neel Kashkari’s consistent advocacy for two Fed interest rate cuts this year highlights a potential shift in monetary policy. These cuts, if they materialize, could offer relief to borrowers, stimulate economic activity, and impact various markets. However, the ultimate decision rests with the broader Federal Reserve committee, which weighs a multitude of economic indicators before acting. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does it mean when the Fed cuts interest rates? When the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, it generally means they are reducing the cost for banks to borrow money. This, in turn, often leads to lower interest rates for consumers and businesses on loans like mortgages, car loans, and credit cards, aiming to stimulate economic activity. Q2: Why would the Fed consider two Fed interest rate cuts this year? The Fed might consider two interest rate cuts if they believe inflation is consistently moving towards their 2% target, or if there are signs of slowing economic growth that could benefit from stimulation. Policymakers like Kashkari may feel the current rates are too restrictive given the economic outlook. Q3: How quickly do Fed interest rate cuts affect the economy? The effects of Fed interest rate cuts can be seen relatively quickly in financial markets, but they typically take several months to fully filter through to the broader economy, impacting consumer spending, business investment, and inflation. Q4: Will Fed interest rate cuts impact my cryptocurrency investments? While not a direct impact, Fed interest rate cuts can indirectly affect cryptocurrency markets. Lower traditional interest rates might make riskier assets like cryptocurrencies more attractive to investors seeking higher returns. Additionally, a more liquid and stimulated economy can sometimes boost overall market sentiment, benefiting crypto assets. Q5: Who is Neel Kashkari? Neel Kashkari is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He is one of the twelve regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents who contribute to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) discussions, which set the nation’s monetary policy. Did you find this article insightful? Share your thoughts and help others understand the potential impact of future Fed decisions! You can share this article on your favorite social media platforms. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Crucial Insights: Two Fed Interest Rate Cuts on the Horizon? first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/19 19:35
US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams

The post US Senators Introduce SAFE Crypto Act to Target Rising Crypto Scams appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Crypto scams are getting faster, smarter and
Paylaş
CoinPedia2025/12/17 18:33
Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg

Bloomberg exposes Crypto.com’s 2023 user data leak. The perpetrators used phishing to access employee accounts, compromising privacy. A data breach that occurred in 2023 at Crypto.com compromised the personal information of its users, according to a disclosure by Bloomberg.  The hacking was planned by a well-known hacker organization known as Scattered Spider.  This team was […] The post Crypto.com Data Leak Revealed: Hidden Attack Exposed by Bloomberg appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/09/23 03:00