What happens when a new-money crypto giant tries to buy a century-old football dynasty? A culture clash that reveals the deep resistance crypto faces in its questWhat happens when a new-money crypto giant tries to buy a century-old football dynasty? A culture clash that reveals the deep resistance crypto faces in its quest

Why Tether Failed to Buy Juventus and What Should We Learn from It?

2025/12/15 15:07

Exor, the holding company of the Agnelli family and owner of Juventus for over a century, rejected an unsolicited all‑cash takeover proposal from Tether Investments on Dec. 13, blocking a €1.1 billion offer for its 65.4% stake in Juventus Football Club.

In this article, let’s try to analyze what happened and why the attempt failed.

What Tether had on the plate for Juventus

Tether had offered €2.66 per share for Exor’s holding, a 21% premium to Juventus’ 12 December close of €2.19 in Milan, according to the terms reported by Reuters and Exor’s advisers.

The proposal implied an equity valuation just over €1.0 billion, or roughly $1.17–$1.30 billion depending on FX at trade date. Exor’s rejection landed less than 24 hours after Tether went public with the bid. Juventus shares last traded near that pre‑bid level after an initial spike faded as the deal path closed.

Tether had framed the move as a long‑horizon play. In its proposal, summarised in market reports from Nasdaq and others, Tether said it intended to fund the deal entirely with its own capital and then launch a tender offer for the free float at the same €2.66 level.

On X, the circulating joke is that Paolo Ardoino, Tether CEO and Italian native, has plotted the deal since day 1 because he’s a long-term club fan. It is worth noting that Tether already owns a minority stake in Juventus.

Some analysts believe the bid was a huge underevaluation, as Juventus has its own stadium and one of the largest fan bases in the EU. However, separate coverage citing Tether’s pitch deck noted a pledge to invest an additional €1 billion in Juventus over time for stadium, commercial, and sporting development, bringing the total deployed capital to €2.1 billion.

Why Exor declined the bid

In its official note, Exor repeated that it has “no intention of selling any of its shares in Juventus to a third party, including but not restricted to El Salvador‑based Tether.”

The holding company highlighted that Exor and the Agnelli family have backed Juventus for “over a century”. It framed the club as a core long‑term asset rather than a financial position. The timing comes three weeks after Juventus raised about €97.8 million through a rights issue to cut debt and recapitalise operations.

Juventus released a separate video message on its own channels in which Exor CEO John Elkann doubled down on the stance. “Juventus, our history and our values are not for sale,” Elkann stated in the video. He added that Juve has been in the family for 102 years and that four generations have carried it through both “tough times” and title runs.

Exor’s answer was blunt. No sale, to Tether or anyone. That position matches background briefings to Reuters in which sources close to the Agnelli camp stressed there is “no intention” of exiting Juventus, despite a decade of thin or negative net profit and a 27% share price slide this year before the offer surfaced.

For traders reading through the noise, the deal spread is gone. The more interesting line is what this signals about crypto capital trying to buy into old‑money franchises.

What we’ve learned from Tether’s reality check

Tether stress‑tested whether a $130 billion stablecoin issuer can deploy a billion‑euro premium check and pry loose a century‑old family asset, and failed instantly. That tells us two things.

First, legacy control shareholders in marquee sports brands still prioritize governance, heritage, and political optics over crypto liquidity, even when the premium hits 20% and a further €1 billion in capex is committed.

Second, as more token issuers stack cash from reserve income and seek real‑world yield, they will continue to probe regulated, high‑visibility assets. Regulators, rating desks, and equity holders now have a live template for how Europe’s family holding companies respond. Any future crypto‑to‑listed‑club approach will need more than a headline valuation bump. It will need a governance structure and reputational package that entrenched owners can defend to their own boards and domestic regulators.

next

The post Why Tether Failed to Buy Juventus and What Should We Learn from It? appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14