An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract,

Auditors flag P290-M Clark air traffic control tower project delays, cost overruns

2025/12/12 09:14

MANILA, Philippines – State auditors flagged the P290.3-million New Clark Air Traffic Control Tower project, awarded in January 2021 and expected to be completed within a year, saying it remains unfinished with no target turnover date.

The 2024 audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation (CIAC) showed the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, but was only 91% complete as of 2024. Costs had also risen 22% to P354.41 million.

Auditors attributed the delays to weak procurement planning, poor project monitoring and possible shortcomings in the contractor’s capacity. They also noted the project broke ground without the required building, electronic, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and sanitary permits from the Clark Development Corporation, the regulator for the Clark Freeport Zone.

Auditors stressed that building permits are mandatory under the National Building Code, with violations carrying fines of up to P20,000 or jail terms of up to two years.

“It was only on April 29, 2024 that CIAC was able to secure the necessary permits from the CDC. The absence of necessary permits during the construction period raises serious concerns regarding regulatory compliance, project authorization, and risk management,” the report read in part.

Auditors said the missing permits reflected poorly on the contractor’s ability to plan and questioned why construction continued for years without them.

“Securing permits is a fundamental requirement in the construction industry, and failure to do so casts doubt on the contractor’s capability to manage regulatory requirements effectively. This oversight not only hindered the project’s progress but also highlighted deficiencies in due diligence and adherence to standard construction protocols,” the report added.

State auditors said CIAC management failed to intervene early, allowing procedural violations to persist.

The contractor sought a suspension of the height clearance limit on March 17, 2022 – two months after the original January 2022 completion date – after the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) denied permits for the tower and tower crane for exceeding allowable height. The control tower’s proposed top elevation was 228.81 meters, compared with CAAP’s 192-meter limit, a 36.81-meter excess.

The report noted that the approval of the Final Aeronautical Study and the redesign of the 4-Instrument Flight Procedures remained pending.

With shortening the tower out of the question, CAAP required an aeronautical study for a height clearance exemption. COA said the study assessed deviations from aerodrome standards, proposed safety measures, and recommended procedures to offset the deviation.

The contractor commissioned an international firm in 2023 to conduct the three-month study, costing P3.9 million. A portion of the findings stressed that “considering the existing defenses and proposed mitigation measures, the risks associated with the new control tower in its final situation are deemed acceptable.”

The results, along with a new Height Clearance Permit application, were submitted to CAAP on October 11, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, the permit had not been issued.

“Further verification revealed that CAAP requires additional documentation to support the aeronautical study report,” the audit showed.

Auditors also found the installed elevators did not match the specified brand in the paid progress billings. While the project listed a German-made Schneider elevator, inspection revealed a different brand.

They said, “According to the approved Bill of Quantities, the contracted brand was Schneider, a German brand. However, during an inspection conducted on March 20, 2025, the installed elevator was identified as Global Fuji, a Chinese brand. A review of records confirmed that this substitution was approved by the then president and chief executive officer of CIAC.” – Rappler.com

Piyasa Fırsatı
MemeCore Logosu
MemeCore Fiyatı(M)
$1.67223
$1.67223$1.67223
-3.21%
USD
MemeCore (M) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflow days since launch

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP ETFs pass $1 billion mark with no outflo
Paylaş
Coindesk2025/12/16 19:01