The post Today’s FED Decision Will Be Unprecedented: Here’s Why, According to a FED Correspondent appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nick Timiraos, a Wall Street Journal reporter known as the “Fed spokesman,” noted that the October Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting was different from previous sessions in many ways. The dot plot in September showed a split in opinion among Committee members: the majority of members supported continuing interest rate cuts for risk management reasons, while a significant minority argued that further cuts were not necessary. Normally, new economic data helps offset such differences. However, the lack of release of key data due to the government shutdown did not provide sufficient reason for members to change their views. The Fed’s 25 basis point rate cut this week has largely been priced in by markets. However, the real challenge is deciding what policy to follow. The lack of employment and inflation data due to the government shutdown complicates the Committee’s future assessment. In September’s projections, a slight majority of members predicted two additional interest rate cuts before the end of the year, while some members argued that this was unnecessary. The primary reason for this division was the lack of new economic data. The lack of labor market indicators, in particular, made the decision-making process uncertain. Fed Chair Jerome Powell highlighted the situation by saying, “If we stop collecting data, it will be difficult to conduct analysis. If this situation continues, data collection may also be hampered.” The data blackout gives Powell some leeway when answering questions about the upcoming period. “There hasn’t been much new information since September,” said former Fed advisor William English. “That keeps members close to their previous positions but widens the uncertainty band.” Powell stated that “there is no risk-free path,” arguing that lowering interest rates too much could accelerate inflation again, but keeping them high could harm the labor market. Fed Governor Stephen Miran… The post Today’s FED Decision Will Be Unprecedented: Here’s Why, According to a FED Correspondent appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nick Timiraos, a Wall Street Journal reporter known as the “Fed spokesman,” noted that the October Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting was different from previous sessions in many ways. The dot plot in September showed a split in opinion among Committee members: the majority of members supported continuing interest rate cuts for risk management reasons, while a significant minority argued that further cuts were not necessary. Normally, new economic data helps offset such differences. However, the lack of release of key data due to the government shutdown did not provide sufficient reason for members to change their views. The Fed’s 25 basis point rate cut this week has largely been priced in by markets. However, the real challenge is deciding what policy to follow. The lack of employment and inflation data due to the government shutdown complicates the Committee’s future assessment. In September’s projections, a slight majority of members predicted two additional interest rate cuts before the end of the year, while some members argued that this was unnecessary. The primary reason for this division was the lack of new economic data. The lack of labor market indicators, in particular, made the decision-making process uncertain. Fed Chair Jerome Powell highlighted the situation by saying, “If we stop collecting data, it will be difficult to conduct analysis. If this situation continues, data collection may also be hampered.” The data blackout gives Powell some leeway when answering questions about the upcoming period. “There hasn’t been much new information since September,” said former Fed advisor William English. “That keeps members close to their previous positions but widens the uncertainty band.” Powell stated that “there is no risk-free path,” arguing that lowering interest rates too much could accelerate inflation again, but keeping them high could harm the labor market. Fed Governor Stephen Miran…

Today’s FED Decision Will Be Unprecedented: Here’s Why, According to a FED Correspondent

2025/10/30 04:24

Nick Timiraos, a Wall Street Journal reporter known as the “Fed spokesman,” noted that the October Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting was different from previous sessions in many ways.

The dot plot in September showed a split in opinion among Committee members: the majority of members supported continuing interest rate cuts for risk management reasons, while a significant minority argued that further cuts were not necessary.

Normally, new economic data helps offset such differences. However, the lack of release of key data due to the government shutdown did not provide sufficient reason for members to change their views.

The Fed’s 25 basis point rate cut this week has largely been priced in by markets. However, the real challenge is deciding what policy to follow. The lack of employment and inflation data due to the government shutdown complicates the Committee’s future assessment.

In September’s projections, a slight majority of members predicted two additional interest rate cuts before the end of the year, while some members argued that this was unnecessary. The primary reason for this division was the lack of new economic data. The lack of labor market indicators, in particular, made the decision-making process uncertain.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell highlighted the situation by saying, “If we stop collecting data, it will be difficult to conduct analysis. If this situation continues, data collection may also be hampered.”

The data blackout gives Powell some leeway when answering questions about the upcoming period. “There hasn’t been much new information since September,” said former Fed advisor William English. “That keeps members close to their previous positions but widens the uncertainty band.”

Powell stated that “there is no risk-free path,” arguing that lowering interest rates too much could accelerate inflation again, but keeping them high could harm the labor market.

Fed Governor Stephen Miran is expected to oppose a larger 50 basis point cut at this week’s meeting, but without significant signs of weakening in the labor market, that proposal is unlikely to garner support.

Officials will also discuss when to end the $6.6 trillion balance sheet reduction program. Analysts say the move could be justified if overnight interest rates approach the upper end of the target range.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/todays-fed-decision-will-be-unprecedented-heres-why-according-to-a-fed-correspondent/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05