The post Tether to Pay $299.5 Million in Celsius Settlement: BRIC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights Tether will pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate as part of a legal settlement The settlement resolves a lawsuit alleging Tether violated bankruptcy law by transferring and liquidating collateral before Celsius’s 2022 bankruptcy filing The legal action was managed by the Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium (BRIC), which was appointed to maximize recoveries for Celsius’s creditors The Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium, known as BRIC, has announced a major settlement requiring Tether to pay $299.5 million to Celsius Network, a bankruptcy estate of the failed crypto lending platform.  BRIC announced a $299.5 million settlement with Tether to pay the Celsius bankruptcy estate. The agreement stems from an adversary proceeding BRIC filed in August 2024 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging Tether violated bankruptcy law and… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 14, 2025 This agreement brings to a close a legal dispute that was initiated just a few months ago. The legal action was an adversary proceeding, a type of lawsuit within a bankruptcy case, which BRIC filed in August of this year in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.  In the lawsuit, some serious allegations have been made against Tether. It claimed that Tether had broken bankruptcy laws and other related legal duties.  The specific accusation was that Tether transferred and sold off collateral in the time leading up to Celsius’s bankruptcy filing in July 2022. This new settlement directly addresses those claims and results in a major payment being made to the pool of money intended for Celsius’s creditors.  David Proman, the Managing Partner of GXD Labs, commented on the resolution. He stated, “We are pleased to have resolved Celsius’s adversary proceeding and related claims against Tether. In addition, we are pleased with the… The post Tether to Pay $299.5 Million in Celsius Settlement: BRIC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights Tether will pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate as part of a legal settlement The settlement resolves a lawsuit alleging Tether violated bankruptcy law by transferring and liquidating collateral before Celsius’s 2022 bankruptcy filing The legal action was managed by the Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium (BRIC), which was appointed to maximize recoveries for Celsius’s creditors The Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium, known as BRIC, has announced a major settlement requiring Tether to pay $299.5 million to Celsius Network, a bankruptcy estate of the failed crypto lending platform.  BRIC announced a $299.5 million settlement with Tether to pay the Celsius bankruptcy estate. The agreement stems from an adversary proceeding BRIC filed in August 2024 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging Tether violated bankruptcy law and… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 14, 2025 This agreement brings to a close a legal dispute that was initiated just a few months ago. The legal action was an adversary proceeding, a type of lawsuit within a bankruptcy case, which BRIC filed in August of this year in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.  In the lawsuit, some serious allegations have been made against Tether. It claimed that Tether had broken bankruptcy laws and other related legal duties.  The specific accusation was that Tether transferred and sold off collateral in the time leading up to Celsius’s bankruptcy filing in July 2022. This new settlement directly addresses those claims and results in a major payment being made to the pool of money intended for Celsius’s creditors.  David Proman, the Managing Partner of GXD Labs, commented on the resolution. He stated, “We are pleased to have resolved Celsius’s adversary proceeding and related claims against Tether. In addition, we are pleased with the…

Tether to Pay $299.5 Million in Celsius Settlement: BRIC

2025/10/15 09:11

Key Highlights

  • Tether will pay $299.5 million to the Celsius Network bankruptcy estate as part of a legal settlement
  • The settlement resolves a lawsuit alleging Tether violated bankruptcy law by transferring and liquidating collateral before Celsius’s 2022 bankruptcy filing
  • The legal action was managed by the Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium (BRIC), which was appointed to maximize recoveries for Celsius’s creditors

The Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium, known as BRIC, has announced a major settlement requiring Tether to pay $299.5 million to Celsius Network, a bankruptcy estate of the failed crypto lending platform. 

This agreement brings to a close a legal dispute that was initiated just a few months ago. The legal action was an adversary proceeding, a type of lawsuit within a bankruptcy case, which BRIC filed in August of this year in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. 

In the lawsuit, some serious allegations have been made against Tether. It claimed that Tether had broken bankruptcy laws and other related legal duties. 

The specific accusation was that Tether transferred and sold off collateral in the time leading up to Celsius’s bankruptcy filing in July 2022. This new settlement directly addresses those claims and results in a major payment being made to the pool of money intended for Celsius’s creditors. 

David Proman, the Managing Partner of GXD Labs, commented on the resolution. He stated, “We are pleased to have resolved Celsius’s adversary proceeding and related claims against Tether. In addition, we are pleased with the timeliness with which the settlement was achieved.”

The legal case was managed through BRIC, which is a joint venture created by GXD Labs and the global asset manager VanEck. BRIC was created in early 2023 with a specific goal to increase the money recovered from crypto-based company failures, such as the Celsius bankruptcy. 

Its role became official in January 2024 when it was appointed as the Complex Asset Recovery Manager and Litigation Administrator. This appointment was made by the debtors and the official committee representing unsecured creditors in the Celsius case. 

Ongoing Efforts for Creditor Recovery

The work of BRIC is not finished with this settlement. The consortium continues to manage a portfolio of illiquid assets and other litigation assets for the Celsius bankruptcy incident. It is overseeing the wind-down of Celsius’s remaining affairs to cover the return of the creditors who lost money.

The team leading BRIC brings together specialized expertise from both GXD Labs and VanEck. This collaboration helps firms to manage litigation and illiquid cryptocurrencies. 

Celsius Network Bankruptcy Incident

Celsius Network, a New Jersey-based cryptocurrency lending platform, allowed users to earn high yields on deposited assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum by lending them out. 

During ‘crypto winter’ in 2022, the sudden collapse of TerraUSD (UST) and Luna triggered market panic in the entire cryptocurrency market, wiping out billions of dollars of market cap due to a massive sell-off. Celsius faced a “bank run’ with over $1 billion in daily withdrawals. This abnormal spike in withdrawal rate exposed the platform to liquidity shortfalls from unsecured loans to firms like Three Arrows Capital (3AC).

Due to this massive trading volume, Celsius halted all withdrawals, swaps, and transfers by citing “extreme market conditions.” This froze $4.7 billion in customer funds. Later on, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. 

These court filings revealed approximately $4.3 billion in total assets and $5.5 billion in liabilities. Due to this, users became unsecured creditors due to the company’s poor asset deployment decisions. 

A report from an independent examiner called the Celsius model “Ponzi-like.” Founder Alex Mashinsky resigned in September 2022 amid fraud probes. He was arrested in July 2023 on charges of securities fraud and market manipulation, later sentenced to 12 years in prison on June 17, 2025.

Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/tether-299-million-celsius-settlement-bric/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00