The post Tether co-founder’s new coin STBL is already down 80% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. STBL, the once-$300 million coin that Tether co-founder Reeve Collins launched a month ago, has dumped 80% as of publication time. Five wallets, all funded via Tornado Cash on March 13, 2024, ranked among the coin’s most profitable traders and extracted a combined $17 million. This means that the asset now has a mere $50 million in market cap left for everyone else. Dozens of sales — heavily weighted toward its lofty debut and price spikes through early October — showcase curious trading prowess. Collins claims that STBL, which briefly benefitted from his fame as a Tether co-founder, is a governance token for USST. He also calls it a “next evolution” USD-pegged stablecoin, despite it apparently having less than $1.6 million worth of available collateral. The coin isn’t even listed on CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko. By comparison, tether (USDT) has over $162 billion in collateral. Collins previously served as CEO of Tether, a role now occupied by Paolo Ardoino, and Tether claimed Collins was “one of the first employees of A Quantive, which Microsoft acquired for $6.6 billion.” Collins also raised $70 million for a gambling business, Pala Interactive. A long way down since CEO at Tether Unlike Tether’s largest shareholders, Collins isn’t listed on any major billionaire leaderboards. Tether Chairman Giancarlo Devasini could be worth $13 billion to $224 billion, while CEO Paolo Ardoino and former CEO Jean-Louis van der Velde could both be worth $9 billion to $95 billion. The high end of these wide ranges are due to a marked up valuation for Tether’s $15 billion open fundraising round. Despite co-creating a company that claims to be one of the most profitable enterprises per employee in the history of humanity, neither Forbes nor Bloomberg estimates Collins to be a billionaire. Read more: Tether: Ten years, 100,000,000,000 USDT, and… The post Tether co-founder’s new coin STBL is already down 80% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. STBL, the once-$300 million coin that Tether co-founder Reeve Collins launched a month ago, has dumped 80% as of publication time. Five wallets, all funded via Tornado Cash on March 13, 2024, ranked among the coin’s most profitable traders and extracted a combined $17 million. This means that the asset now has a mere $50 million in market cap left for everyone else. Dozens of sales — heavily weighted toward its lofty debut and price spikes through early October — showcase curious trading prowess. Collins claims that STBL, which briefly benefitted from his fame as a Tether co-founder, is a governance token for USST. He also calls it a “next evolution” USD-pegged stablecoin, despite it apparently having less than $1.6 million worth of available collateral. The coin isn’t even listed on CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko. By comparison, tether (USDT) has over $162 billion in collateral. Collins previously served as CEO of Tether, a role now occupied by Paolo Ardoino, and Tether claimed Collins was “one of the first employees of A Quantive, which Microsoft acquired for $6.6 billion.” Collins also raised $70 million for a gambling business, Pala Interactive. A long way down since CEO at Tether Unlike Tether’s largest shareholders, Collins isn’t listed on any major billionaire leaderboards. Tether Chairman Giancarlo Devasini could be worth $13 billion to $224 billion, while CEO Paolo Ardoino and former CEO Jean-Louis van der Velde could both be worth $9 billion to $95 billion. The high end of these wide ranges are due to a marked up valuation for Tether’s $15 billion open fundraising round. Despite co-creating a company that claims to be one of the most profitable enterprises per employee in the history of humanity, neither Forbes nor Bloomberg estimates Collins to be a billionaire. Read more: Tether: Ten years, 100,000,000,000 USDT, and…

Tether co-founder’s new coin STBL is already down 80%

2025/10/20 19:41

STBL, the once-$300 million coin that Tether co-founder Reeve Collins launched a month ago, has dumped 80% as of publication time.

Five wallets, all funded via Tornado Cash on March 13, 2024, ranked among the coin’s most profitable traders and extracted a combined $17 million.

This means that the asset now has a mere $50 million in market cap left for everyone else.

Dozens of sales — heavily weighted toward its lofty debut and price spikes through early October — showcase curious trading prowess.

Collins claims that STBL, which briefly benefitted from his fame as a Tether co-founder, is a governance token for USST. He also calls it a “next evolution” USD-pegged stablecoin, despite it apparently having less than $1.6 million worth of available collateral.

The coin isn’t even listed on CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko.

By comparison, tether (USDT) has over $162 billion in collateral.

Collins previously served as CEO of Tether, a role now occupied by Paolo Ardoino, and Tether claimed Collins was “one of the first employees of A Quantive, which Microsoft acquired for $6.6 billion.”

Collins also raised $70 million for a gambling business, Pala Interactive.

A long way down since CEO at Tether

Unlike Tether’s largest shareholders, Collins isn’t listed on any major billionaire leaderboards.

Tether Chairman Giancarlo Devasini could be worth $13 billion to $224 billion, while CEO Paolo Ardoino and former CEO Jean-Louis van der Velde could both be worth $9 billion to $95 billion.

The high end of these wide ranges are due to a marked up valuation for Tether’s $15 billion open fundraising round.

Despite co-creating a company that claims to be one of the most profitable enterprises per employee in the history of humanity, neither Forbes nor Bloomberg estimates Collins to be a billionaire.

Read more: Tether: Ten years, 100,000,000,000 USDT, and still no audit

Sadly, now, Collins also seems to be responsible for the awkward launch of a stablecoin with less than $2 million in available collateral and a governance token that’s lost four-fifths of its value within a month of launch.

He was also unable or unwilling to prevent the coordinated, $17 million worth of extractive selling of five wallets belonging to the coin’s earliest insiders.

STBL has responded to complaints about the disappointing launch, claiming to be “focused on building the best product for the users.” 

It tried to broadcast reassurance, “cashing out meaninglessly by dumping tokens neither aligns with our long term goals nor does it justify the value that we are creating.”

STBL has lost one-third of its value since that reassurance.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/tether-co-founders-new-coin-stbl-is-already-down-80/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00