BitcoinWorld Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery. What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting. This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit. A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million. These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital. Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move: Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact. Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination. Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks. Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely. This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains. The Broader Impact on DeFi Security Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight: The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols. The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds. The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment. The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards. Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights: Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol. Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds. Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits. Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with. The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key. The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently? A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit. Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)? A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks. Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH? A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities. Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost? A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million. Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem? A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space. If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices. This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery. What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting. This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit. A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million. These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital. Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move: Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact. Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination. Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks. Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely. This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains. The Broader Impact on DeFi Security Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight: The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols. The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds. The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment. The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards. Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights: Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol. Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds. Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits. Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with. The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key. The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently? A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit. Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)? A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks. Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH? A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities. Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost? A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million. Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem? A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space. If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices. This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired

2025/10/30 10:40

BitcoinWorld

Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired

The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery.

What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move

In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting.

This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit.

A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack

This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million.

These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital.

Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy

One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move:

  • Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact.
  • Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination.
  • Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks.
  • Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely.

This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains.

The Broader Impact on DeFi Security

Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight:

  • The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols.
  • The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds.
  • The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment.

The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards.

Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape

For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights:

  • Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol.
  • Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds.
  • Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits.
  • Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with.

The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key.

The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently?
A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit.

Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)?
A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks.

Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH?
A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities.

Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost?
A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million.

Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem?
A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space.

If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed!

To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices.

This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00