PENGU hovers near a crucial support zone, with participants eyeing a potential reversal as social momentum and technical signals begin to align.PENGU hovers near a crucial support zone, with participants eyeing a potential reversal as social momentum and technical signals begin to align.

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) Price Prediction: Will Bulls Defend the $0.017 Support or Face Another Leg Down?

2025/11/02 03:50

Despite cooling off from its recent highs, PENGU continues to draw heavy attention across crypto circles. Market watchers view the Pudgy Penguins’ current consolidation as a setup rather than a setback, with technicals and sentiment slowly aligning for a potential rebound.

Market Buzz Builds Around PENGU

Momentum around Pudgy Penguins PENGU continues to grow across the market, with Anon Cooker increasingly eyeing it as one of the standout small-cap assets of Q4. Community discussions have turned notably more speculative, fueled by ongoing development updates and renewed ETF talks.

Such social momentum often precedes structural reversals in accumulation-heavy assets. If market sentiment continues to strengthen alongside liquidity inflows, PENGU could soon transition from its consolidation phase towards a more aggressive upside cycle, especially as interest in meme-linked tokens resurges.

Indicators Hint at Potential Reversal Zone

PENGU is approaching a potential inflection point within a defined descending parallel channel. The asset is currently testing the lower boundary near $0.0175, which coincides with the bottom of the golden pocket region (0.618 Fibonacci retracement). Meanwhile, RSI sits close to 30, reflecting oversold conditions, and MACD remains in the negative zone but is flattening, suggesting that selling pressure may be nearing exhaustion.

PENGU tests the lower boundary of its descending channel near $0.0175, signaling potential reversal interest. Source: Henmo via X

Volume contraction further supports the idea of stabilization before a potential breakout. If momentum flips positive, the first key target sits around $0.022, followed by $0.028 to $0.030 where previous resistance lines intersect.

Liquidation Heatmap Shows Room for a Squeeze

Kwiik’s liquidation heatmap analysis suggests that PENGU’s largest cluster of short liquidations lies near $0.034. With the majority of leveraged positions concentrated below current market prices, a move towards that level could trigger a short squeeze scenario.

PENGU’s liquidation map highlights a dense short cluster near $0.034, creating conditions for a potential squeeze if momentum strengthens. Source: Kwiik via X

This liquidity pocket remains the most attractive upside target for PENGU in the near term. Historically, such clustered liquidations act as magnets for price movement when funding resets and open interest drops. If buying pressure accelerates, reclaiming $0.025–$0.030 could serve as a technical trigger zone en route to that $0.034 objective.

Contrary View: More Downside Still Possible

BRUH’s technical chart paints a more cautious picture, projecting that PENGU may still face 20–30% downside before finding a stable base. The Pudgy Penguins structure reflects a descending triangle pattern, with lower highs compressing towards the major horizontal support around $0.0140 to $0.0135. This range coincides with a historically strong demand zone from prior consolidations.

PENGU’s descending triangle formation signals possible weakness, with support eyed at $0.0140–$0.0135 as bears test the lower boundary. Source: BRUH via X

If the current trendline resistance remains intact, another leg lower cannot be ruled out before recovery. However, a decisive reclaim above $0.021 would invalidate the bearish structure, opening the door for a potential reversal.

Final Thoughts: What Next for PENGU?

PENGU trades at $0.01812 with a daily volume of $170 million and a market cap exceeding $1.14 billion. The asset remains in a consolidation zone but continues to hold a strong presence in both volume and community activity, underscoring its relevance among mid-cap plays.

Pudgy Penguins’ current price is $0.01812, down -3.19% in the last 24 hours. Source: Brave New Coin

Technically, the $0.017 to $0.018 support zone defines the make-or-break level for the next move. A confirmed rebound from this range could set the stage for a climb towards $0.025 to $0.030, and potentially the $0.034 liquidation target highlighted earlier. Conversely, failure to defend this base might extend consolidation into deeper territory. Overall, PENGU price currently stands at pivotal crossroad.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00