The post NFTs Crater as Farmers Abandon OpenSea appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Digital collectibles continue to struggle as OpenSea volume drops by half. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are continuing their multi-year downtrend, with prices and volumes plummeting after OpenSea’s first XP crate distribution. Legacy NFT collections such as Bored Ape Yacht Club and Pudgy Penguins are down more than 50% since the summer, when the market rallied following the start of OpenSea’s chest farming system. However, following the first chest distribution, OpenSea NFT volumes are now down 48% over the last week, and Blur’s are down 60%. Falling volumes are being reflected in asset prices. Bored Ape Yacht Club is down 26% over the last month to 6.55 ETH, or $24,000, its lowest price since 2021. Meanwhile, Pudgy Penguins are down 33% over the last month to 6.65 ETH, and are down 80% from their all-time high in December, which was catalyzed by the PENGU token launch. Azuki, another legacy NFT collection whose floor price reached over 35 ETH at its peak, has retraced its entire lifecycle and is now trading at 1.08 ETH, after minting for 1 ETH per NFT in 2022. The collection even fell below 1 ETH recently amid a mass liquidation of Blur loans. Leading NFT Collections – Blur New NFT collections such as Hyperliquid’s Hypurrs haven’t been spared either, and are changing hands at 950 HYPE, or $41,000, after trading at $57,000 just two days ago, and $80,000 on OTC markets before they launched. Post Farming Drop Off OpenSea concluded its first chest farming campaign on October 17, where users were farming XP in order to earn chests, which were thought to contain valuable NFTs and points that could make their future $SEA allocations quantifiable. However, most farmers received pennies on the dollar for their fees paid, a new allocation of OpenSea treasures – which are to be… The post NFTs Crater as Farmers Abandon OpenSea appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Digital collectibles continue to struggle as OpenSea volume drops by half. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are continuing their multi-year downtrend, with prices and volumes plummeting after OpenSea’s first XP crate distribution. Legacy NFT collections such as Bored Ape Yacht Club and Pudgy Penguins are down more than 50% since the summer, when the market rallied following the start of OpenSea’s chest farming system. However, following the first chest distribution, OpenSea NFT volumes are now down 48% over the last week, and Blur’s are down 60%. Falling volumes are being reflected in asset prices. Bored Ape Yacht Club is down 26% over the last month to 6.55 ETH, or $24,000, its lowest price since 2021. Meanwhile, Pudgy Penguins are down 33% over the last month to 6.65 ETH, and are down 80% from their all-time high in December, which was catalyzed by the PENGU token launch. Azuki, another legacy NFT collection whose floor price reached over 35 ETH at its peak, has retraced its entire lifecycle and is now trading at 1.08 ETH, after minting for 1 ETH per NFT in 2022. The collection even fell below 1 ETH recently amid a mass liquidation of Blur loans. Leading NFT Collections – Blur New NFT collections such as Hyperliquid’s Hypurrs haven’t been spared either, and are changing hands at 950 HYPE, or $41,000, after trading at $57,000 just two days ago, and $80,000 on OTC markets before they launched. Post Farming Drop Off OpenSea concluded its first chest farming campaign on October 17, where users were farming XP in order to earn chests, which were thought to contain valuable NFTs and points that could make their future $SEA allocations quantifiable. However, most farmers received pennies on the dollar for their fees paid, a new allocation of OpenSea treasures – which are to be…

NFTs Crater as Farmers Abandon OpenSea

2025/10/31 04:50

Digital collectibles continue to struggle as OpenSea volume drops by half.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are continuing their multi-year downtrend, with prices and volumes plummeting after OpenSea’s first XP crate distribution.

Legacy NFT collections such as Bored Ape Yacht Club and Pudgy Penguins are down more than 50% since the summer, when the market rallied following the start of OpenSea’s chest farming system. However, following the first chest distribution, OpenSea NFT volumes are now down 48% over the last week, and Blur’s are down 60%.

Falling volumes are being reflected in asset prices. Bored Ape Yacht Club is down 26% over the last month to 6.55 ETH, or $24,000, its lowest price since 2021. Meanwhile, Pudgy Penguins are down 33% over the last month to 6.65 ETH, and are down 80% from their all-time high in December, which was catalyzed by the PENGU token launch.

Azuki, another legacy NFT collection whose floor price reached over 35 ETH at its peak, has retraced its entire lifecycle and is now trading at 1.08 ETH, after minting for 1 ETH per NFT in 2022. The collection even fell below 1 ETH recently amid a mass liquidation of Blur loans.

Leading NFT Collections – Blur

New NFT collections such as Hyperliquid’s Hypurrs haven’t been spared either, and are changing hands at 950 HYPE, or $41,000, after trading at $57,000 just two days ago, and $80,000 on OTC markets before they launched.

Post Farming Drop Off

OpenSea concluded its first chest farming campaign on October 17, where users were farming XP in order to earn chests, which were thought to contain valuable NFTs and points that could make their future $SEA allocations quantifiable.

However, most farmers received pennies on the dollar for their fees paid, a new allocation of OpenSea treasures – which are to be “meaningfully considered” at TGE – and anyone who won an NFT worth more than $10,000 was surprised by a KYC form to claim their prize.

Upon the conclusion of the first chest farming season, OpenSea CEO Devin Finzer took to X to share statistics on OpenSea’s new focus on token trading.

“OpenSea crossed $2.6B in trading volume this month, with over 90% from token trading. This is just the beginning of our transformation, from “NFT marketplace” to “trade everything,” said Finzer.

However, OpenSea DEX aggregator volumes have plummeted since the first chest distribution. The platform generated an all-time high of $462 million in volume on Oct. 15 but has processed only between $3 million and $8 million every day since.

OpenSea DEX Aggregator Volume – DeFiLlama

Source: https://thedefiant.io/news/nfts-and-web3/nfts-crater-as-farmers-abandon-opensea

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00