This partnership between MetYa and Aidica is focused on simplifying initial coin offering (ICO) engagement while also fortifying Web3 users.This partnership between MetYa and Aidica is focused on simplifying initial coin offering (ICO) engagement while also fortifying Web3 users.

MetYa Taps Aidica to Streamline ICO Engagement and Strengthen Real Web3 Consumers

2025/10/24 21:20
blockchain main88

MetYa, a cutting-edge AI-powered SocialFi platform, has partnered with Aidica, a well-known entity bridging efficient crypto projects and real users. The partnership endeavors to simplify Initial Coin Offering (ICO) engagement while guaranteeing real user participation, transparency, and authenticity in the Web3 sector. As the official social media post of MetYa reveals, the collaboration signifies both the entities’ mutual endeavor of linking consumers with significant blockchain opportunities. Hence, the development is poised to transform how consumers interact with, invest in, and discover new crypto projects.

MetYa and Aidica Partner to Enable Seamless ICO Engagement with Transparency

The partnership between MetYa and Aidica is focused on simplifying ICO engagement while also fortifying Web3 users. In this respect, both the entities plan to establish a seamless network, letting users safely delve into validated cryptocurrency launches. Additionally, the robust platform of Aidica guarantees that only vetted and high-quality initiatives are featured.

Apart from that, MetYa’s AI-driven PayFi and SocialFi tools improve consumer engagement via on-chain tasks as well as real reward apparatuses. This mutual development is reportedly set to streamline the normally risky and complex procedure of ICO engagement. This opens new avenues for a wider audience to efficiently engage with the rapidly evolving crypto space. At the same time, the integration highlights the rising trend of adopting a user-led and trust-centric approach when it comes to project launches.

Restoring Web3 User Confidence via Verified and Fair Crypto Launches

According to MetYa, the partnership goes in line with the growing demand for a more transparent and fairer launch setting. Thus, amid the persistent influence of unverified projects in the crypto sector, this alliance stresses real rewards, real projects, and real consumers. Ultimately, this joint effort could notably contribute to restoring confidence among Web3 participants and investors.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05