Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon is in talks to plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case tied to the $40 billion Terra collapse. Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case over the 2022 collapse…Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon is in talks to plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case tied to the $40 billion Terra collapse. Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case over the 2022 collapse…

LUNA and LUNC on the edge as Do Kwon eyes guilty plea in $40B Terraform case

2025/08/12 13:03

Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon is in talks to plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case tied to the $40 billion Terra collapse.

Summary
  • Do Kwon may plead guilty in U.S. case over the $40B Terra ecosystem collapse, according to Bloomberg sources.
  • LUNA and LUNC prices fell as investors weighed potential legal and market fallout.
  • Case follows global legal pressure, with Kwon already convicted in Montenegro and facing extradition requests.

Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon may plead guilty in a U.S. criminal case over the 2022 collapse of the $40 billion Terra ecosystem, according to an Aug. 11 Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter.

The move would mark a major shift in a high-profile legal battle that has weighed heavily on the Terra (LUNA) and Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) tokens for more than two years.

Do Kwon’s mounting legal troubles

Sources told Bloomberg that U.S. prosecutors and Kwon’s legal team are discussing a possible plea deal, though terms have not been finalized. Since his extradition from Montenegro, where he was detained in March 2023 on suspicion of using forged travel documents, Kwon has been in  U.S custody. 

He faces fraud and securities violations in connection with TerraUSD, the algorithmic stablecoin whose collapse triggered a market-wide selloff in May 2022.

Terraform Labs, which filed for bankruptcy in January, has denied wrongdoing. However, the legal pressure on Kwon has intensified, with U.S. and South Korean authorities pursuing parallel criminal cases. A possible plea deal would not necessarily settle charges abroad, but it might speed up proceedings in the U.S 

Due to persistent legal and regulatory obstacles, investor sentiment has been muted, and both LUNA and LUNC are trading close to important technical levels.

LUNA technical picture

At $0.1602, LUNA is trading just above the 20-day moving average of $0.1612 but below the $0.1761 upper Bollinger Band resistance. Neutral momentum is indicated by the relative strength index, which is at 44.75.

LUNA and LUNC on the edge as Do Kwon eyes guilty plea in $40B Terraform case - 1

Over the past week, the price has been consolidating between $0.148 and $0.169. While trading volume has increased 39.50% over the past day, open interest has decreased 6.16%, indicating that leveraged traders are still being cautious.

A sustained break above $0.169 could target $0.176 and $0.190. A decline toward $0.148 could occur if the $0.158 support is not maintained.

LUNC technical picture

LUNC is trading at $0.00006116, just below the upper Bollinger Band resistance at $0.00006464, and close to its 20-day moving average of $0.00006060. A modest recovery from oversold territory is indicated by the RSI of 46.37.

LUNA and LUNC on the edge as Do Kwon eyes guilty plea in $40B Terraform case - 2

The 7-day range is $0.00005686 to $0.00006417. Trading volume has risen 3.20% and derivatives volume 17.18%, though open interest fell 3.62%. $0.00007000 could be reached if the price breaks above $0.00006417. Should it be rejected, the price might return towards the  $0.00005700 zone.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05