The post Lex from Gopnikz on building the future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Bitcoin, BSV and Culture: Lex from Gopnikz on building the future Lex from Gopnikz joined the CoinGeek Weekly Livestream this week to talk about what he’s working on, the future of scalable Bitcoin, and how to improve the culture in BSV. title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Who is Lex from Gopnikz? Lex is a Romanian Bitcoin entrepreneur and cultural influencer. He’s behind the famous Gopnikz project on BSV and handles the marketing for several projects in the ecosystem. Right now, he’s working with prediction markets, merchant applications, and an upcoming project called the Universal Identity System. Recently, Lex has been focused on BRC100, ToolSV, and the Metanet wallet. He believes the latter needs much more adoption for BSV to grow into the Metanet it’s meant to become, but he also recognizes the user-experience problems. Lex believes there’s still a huge gap in the market for a solid BSV-based social media app. He tips his hat to Treechat.ai, but it doesn’t have the same traction as Twetch did, and he’s going to try to revive something along those lines. Host Kurt Wuckert Jr. agrees, noting how many devs building on other chains say Twetch was the best example so far. BSV culture and the need for change Wuckert compliments Lex on his ability to spot gaps in the culture and even to influence and create it. Lex says the culture around BSV was stuck up for a long time, especially regarding tech purity. Yet, projects like Twetch and Gopnikz, which were memes in their own right, are two of the most successful BSV projects because they were down-to-earth and fun. As far as the tech goes, BSV is in the right position, but many underestimated how long it would take and how well-organized the suppression effort would be. As a digital marketer who has helped accounts grow… The post Lex from Gopnikz on building the future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Bitcoin, BSV and Culture: Lex from Gopnikz on building the future Lex from Gopnikz joined the CoinGeek Weekly Livestream this week to talk about what he’s working on, the future of scalable Bitcoin, and how to improve the culture in BSV. title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen> Who is Lex from Gopnikz? Lex is a Romanian Bitcoin entrepreneur and cultural influencer. He’s behind the famous Gopnikz project on BSV and handles the marketing for several projects in the ecosystem. Right now, he’s working with prediction markets, merchant applications, and an upcoming project called the Universal Identity System. Recently, Lex has been focused on BRC100, ToolSV, and the Metanet wallet. He believes the latter needs much more adoption for BSV to grow into the Metanet it’s meant to become, but he also recognizes the user-experience problems. Lex believes there’s still a huge gap in the market for a solid BSV-based social media app. He tips his hat to Treechat.ai, but it doesn’t have the same traction as Twetch did, and he’s going to try to revive something along those lines. Host Kurt Wuckert Jr. agrees, noting how many devs building on other chains say Twetch was the best example so far. BSV culture and the need for change Wuckert compliments Lex on his ability to spot gaps in the culture and even to influence and create it. Lex says the culture around BSV was stuck up for a long time, especially regarding tech purity. Yet, projects like Twetch and Gopnikz, which were memes in their own right, are two of the most successful BSV projects because they were down-to-earth and fun. As far as the tech goes, BSV is in the right position, but many underestimated how long it would take and how well-organized the suppression effort would be. As a digital marketer who has helped accounts grow…

Lex from Gopnikz on building the future

2025/10/10 21:27

Lex from Gopnikz joined the CoinGeek Weekly Livestream this week to talk about what he’s working on, the future of 
scalable Bitcoin, and how to improve the culture in BSV.

title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen>

Who is Lex from Gopnikz?

Lex is a Romanian Bitcoin entrepreneur and cultural influencer. He’s behind the famous Gopnikz project on BSV and handles the marketing for several projects in the ecosystem. Right now, he’s working with prediction markets, merchant applications, and an upcoming project called the Universal Identity System.

Recently, Lex has been focused on BRC100, ToolSV, and the Metanet wallet. He believes the latter needs much more adoption for BSV to grow into the Metanet it’s meant to become, but he also recognizes the user-experience problems.

Lex believes there’s still a huge gap in the market for a solid BSV-based social media app. He tips his hat to Treechat.ai, but it doesn’t have the same traction as Twetch did, and he’s going to try to revive something along those lines. Host Kurt Wuckert Jr. agrees, noting how many devs building on other chains say Twetch was the best example so far.

BSV culture and the need for change

Wuckert compliments Lex on his ability to spot gaps in the culture and even to influence and create it.

Lex says the culture around BSV was stuck up for a long time, especially regarding tech purity. Yet, projects like Twetch and Gopnikz, which were memes in their own right, are two of the most successful BSV projects because they were down-to-earth and fun.

As far as the tech goes, BSV is in the right position, but many underestimated how long it would take and how well-organized the suppression effort would be. As a digital marketer who has helped accounts grow to hundreds of thousands of followers, Lex says nothing seems to work to help BSV break out. His experience tells him it’s a coordinated suppression effort involving powerful players.

Wuckert points to his posts on X, noting how the ones that mention “hijacking Bitcoin” get much more traction than others. He’s unsure why that is, but he assumes it’s something baked into the algorithm. Likewise, he has noticed many original Bitcoiners give up on their libertarian ideals in exchange for cash and a chance to play golf with Larry Fink.

Utility and hard work on the BSV blockchain

All that said, Lex highlights that BSVers have been shipping apps, testing ideas, and utilizing on-chain data for years. The wider industry made fun of WeatherSV back in the day, but now it’s on Solana and seems to be respected.

While the rest of the industry is just playing around with thousands of different blockchains and vast amounts of capital, BSVers have done the work, and in time, we’ll reap the rewards.

Watch: Inside the mind of an entrepreneur

title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen>

Source: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-bsv-and-culture-lex-from-gopnikz-on-building-the-future-video/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00