The post How Ferris State Remains Division II’s Dominant Program In NIL And Transfer Portal Era appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MCKINNEY, TEXAS – DECEMBER 21: Ahlston Ware #22 of the Ferris State Bulldogs celebrates with teammates after defeating the Valdosta State Blazers to win the Division II Football Championship held at McKinney ISD Stadium on December 21, 2024 in McKinney, Texas. (Photo by C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images) NCAA Photos via Getty Images Ferris State football coach Tony Annese sat in front of his television at home in Michigan late last month, the rare chance to watch a game not involving his team. The Bulldogs, the reigning Division II national champions, had the week off, so Annese saw his quarterback from last year, Trinidad Chambliss, play for Ole Miss. Chambliss threw for 314 yards and a touchdown and ran for 71 yards as the Rebels defeated LSU and remained undefeated. “I told his Mom I felt like I was as nervous in that game as I would be for my own game,” Annese said. “And then when Ole Miss won the game, it almost felt like a victory for us.” Such is the new reality for Annese. He has led Ferris State, a school located in Big Rapids, Mich., to three national titles in the past four seasons, but he now has to deal with major Division I programs recruiting his players and tempting them with Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) deals and revenue share money. After last season, Chambliss and seven other starters transferred to Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs. Still, Ferris State is as dominant as ever. The Bulldogs are 6-0 and No. 1 in the country and are winning by an average of 47 points per game. They have won the past three games by a combined 201-0, continuing to roll over their opponents even as the college football world changes. “It’s just a different… The post How Ferris State Remains Division II’s Dominant Program In NIL And Transfer Portal Era appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MCKINNEY, TEXAS – DECEMBER 21: Ahlston Ware #22 of the Ferris State Bulldogs celebrates with teammates after defeating the Valdosta State Blazers to win the Division II Football Championship held at McKinney ISD Stadium on December 21, 2024 in McKinney, Texas. (Photo by C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images) NCAA Photos via Getty Images Ferris State football coach Tony Annese sat in front of his television at home in Michigan late last month, the rare chance to watch a game not involving his team. The Bulldogs, the reigning Division II national champions, had the week off, so Annese saw his quarterback from last year, Trinidad Chambliss, play for Ole Miss. Chambliss threw for 314 yards and a touchdown and ran for 71 yards as the Rebels defeated LSU and remained undefeated. “I told his Mom I felt like I was as nervous in that game as I would be for my own game,” Annese said. “And then when Ole Miss won the game, it almost felt like a victory for us.” Such is the new reality for Annese. He has led Ferris State, a school located in Big Rapids, Mich., to three national titles in the past four seasons, but he now has to deal with major Division I programs recruiting his players and tempting them with Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) deals and revenue share money. After last season, Chambliss and seven other starters transferred to Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs. Still, Ferris State is as dominant as ever. The Bulldogs are 6-0 and No. 1 in the country and are winning by an average of 47 points per game. They have won the past three games by a combined 201-0, continuing to roll over their opponents even as the college football world changes. “It’s just a different…

How Ferris State Remains Division II’s Dominant Program In NIL And Transfer Portal Era

2025/10/15 19:02

MCKINNEY, TEXAS – DECEMBER 21: Ahlston Ware #22 of the Ferris State Bulldogs celebrates with teammates after defeating the Valdosta State Blazers to win the Division II Football Championship held at McKinney ISD Stadium on December 21, 2024 in McKinney, Texas. (Photo by C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images)

NCAA Photos via Getty Images

Ferris State football coach Tony Annese sat in front of his television at home in Michigan late last month, the rare chance to watch a game not involving his team. The Bulldogs, the reigning Division II national champions, had the week off, so Annese saw his quarterback from last year, Trinidad Chambliss, play for Ole Miss. Chambliss threw for 314 yards and a touchdown and ran for 71 yards as the Rebels defeated LSU and remained undefeated.

“I told his Mom I felt like I was as nervous in that game as I would be for my own game,” Annese said. “And then when Ole Miss won the game, it almost felt like a victory for us.”

Such is the new reality for Annese. He has led Ferris State, a school located in Big Rapids, Mich., to three national titles in the past four seasons, but he now has to deal with major Division I programs recruiting his players and tempting them with Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) deals and revenue share money. After last season, Chambliss and seven other starters transferred to Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs.

Still, Ferris State is as dominant as ever. The Bulldogs are 6-0 and No. 1 in the country and are winning by an average of 47 points per game. They have won the past three games by a combined 201-0, continuing to roll over their opponents even as the college football world changes.

“It’s just a different dynamic, a different time with NIL money and the transfer portal,” Annese said. “There weren’t that many people who were, for lack of a better word, preying on our guys. It’s a different time.”

Indeed, until this season, Ferris State had only had a few players transfer, and it wasn’t like the Bulldogs were devoid of talent in previous years. In fact, they entered this season having gone 122-14 since 2014, winning national titles in 2021, 2022 and 2024. Three of their former players are in the NFL in defensive tackle Zach Sieler (a captain with the Miami Dolphins), safety Tavierre Thomas (Minnesota Vikings) and linebacker Caleb Murphy (Los Angeles Chargers), while Ferris State has had two quarterbacks (Jason Vander Laan in 2014 and 2015 and Jayru Campbell in 2018) win the Harlon Hill Trophy for Division II’s top player. Numerous others have made All-American teams.

Still, Annese didn’t have to worry about losing players until shortly after Ferris State defeated Valdosta State, 49-14, in the national title game last December. Within days, agents contacted Chambliss and others, gauging their interest in entering the transfer portal.

Besides Chambliss, four other Ferris State offensive players from last season are now on FBS rosters: running back Kannon Katzer (West Virginia), receiver Tyrese Hunt-Thompson (North Texas) and offensive tackles Bryce George (Iowa) and Lawrence Hattar (Michigan). Two Bulldogs’ defensive players from a year ago are in DI in linebacker Sefa Saipaia (Western Michigan) and safety Lento Smith Jr. (Tulsa), while cornerback Jacarvis Alexandre committed to Jacksonville State earlier this year but is now back in the transfer portal.

The movement not only reflects the talent of Ferris State’s roster but also the willingness of Division I coaches to search for players who until the past year had almost always been overlooked. The pressure on DI coaches to win is as acute as ever, and those programs can lure players with the promise of NIL deals and even a salary because nearly all Division I programs now pay players directly via revenue sharing, which was part of the House v. NCAA settlement that passed earlier this year.

While Ferris State wasn’t part of the House settlement and doesn’t pay players directly, the football program does have a multi-year partnership with Opendorse to help facilitate NIL deals, although even Annese and athletics director Steve Brockelbank admit the Bulldogs can’t compete with the major Division I programs when it comes to money.

“Guys are being bombarded with people who are saying, ‘Hey, I can get you $100,000 if you get in the transfer portal,’” Annese said. “It’s just a crazy dynamic out there.”

Said Brockelbank: “Do I think (the Opendorse deal) helps? Yes. Is it going to stop a Power Four (conference) school from taking one of our student athletes if they want to leave? We’re never going to match the financial offers that those folks are going to make towards our student athletes.”

Still, Brockelbank added that “anytime we can help student athletes out, whether it be academically, financially, socially, character development, whatever it is, I think it all adds up. And it all helps us retain them.”

Despite the defections, Ferris State was able to keep five players who had put their names in the transfer portal before pulling out, and the Bulldogs continue to have a strong roster, which has been a mainstay since Annese’s early days. After graduating from Alma College in 1983, Annese coached and taught at six high schools in Michigan, winning more than 82% of his games in 22 seasons as a head coach, before taking over in January 2009 at Grand Rapids Community College.

In December 2011, Ferris State hired Annese, who was 30-4 the previous three seasons at the junior college level. After going 7-4 and 8-3 in his first two seasons at Ferris State, the Bulldogs won their first 11 games in 2014 before losing to Ohio Dominican in the second round of the NCAA playoffs, the first time in 18 years that they made the NCAAs since 1996. Since then, Ferris State has been the nation’s best Division II program.

The Bulldogs benefit from having a large roster (139 players), with 85 of them coming from Michigan and 30 from Florida, a state that Annese has recruited hard since his junior college days. He has built strong relationships with high school coaches in Florida who see Ferris State as a good landing spot for players who are under the radar of Division I coaches. Of the 33 high school players Ferris State signed in February, 11 are from Florida.

Annesse has also had less assistant coaching turnover compared with most other programs. His son, Steve, is the offensive coordinator and has been on the staff since Annese arrived 14 years ago, as has Ryan Hodges, the senior defensive assistant, and Jack Schugars, the special teams coordinator. Tony Annese and Grant Caserta, the co-defensive coordinators, have been on the staff for several years, while assistant head coach Brian Rock has known Annese since 1991.

“It’s been really good, really a stable situation,” Annese said. “That helps a lot when you’ve got guys that are committed to being with you for a long time.”

Said Brockelbank: “There’s a great level of trust that those kids have with his entire staff. He just pours a lot of love and attention in the young people…What has happened here, as the results have come, it’s allowed us to recruit a higher and higher caliber football player, but he continues to do the same thing and pour that time and love and attention into them. And the results follow.”

Ferris State is currently on a 20-game winning streak, including six consecutive victories this season. The Bulldogs lead Division II in scoring offense (56.5 points per game) and are third in scoring defense (9.5 points allowed per game). Quarterback Wyatt Bower, a redshirt freshman from Michigan, has completed 65.4% of his passes for 12 touchdowns and no interceptions and run for a team-high 471 yards and eight touchdowns.

When Annese recruited Bower, he thought he would bring Bower along slowly, just like he had done with Chambliss, who didn’t play at all his first two seasons and only threw 33 passes before having a breakthrough last season when he threw for 2,925 yards and 31 touchdowns and ran for 1,019 yards and 25 touchdowns. But as Chambliss continued to shine last season, Annese knew Division I programs would be interested. Annese said Chambliss didn’t initially want to leave Ferris State, but he eventually couldn’t pass up the opportunity to play at Ole Miss.

“(The transfer portal) is over time potentially going to be a (problem),” Annese said. “The realization is that we either sell it (to recruits) about Trinidad and the success of our guys or we’re negligent. We’ve got to sell our success. We’ve got to sell the success of the guys that have moved on.”

Brockelbank and the Ferris State administration has been contacting donors and boosters and local companies about the new reality, where recruits and players are considering NIL deals when making decisions.

“It’s happening slowly,” Brockelbank said. “I think it’s a lot for people to digest. It’s quite a change in college football. And certainly, I think it took a while for people to understand it at the Division I level. It’s trickled down to our level. Now, we’re going through an education process with the folks that engage with our football program and the importance of (NIL) and how to get involved with it. It takes time, but we’re certainly seeing increased engagement.”

At the same time, Annese and Brocklebank understand the portal may even help Ferris State. Yes, the Bulldogs can only offer a total of 36 scholarships, the maximum allowed in Division II, compared with 105 scholarships at DI. And they can’t compete with the NIL and revenue share figures that DI programs offer. Still, as DI schools continue targeting transfers, that leaves fewer opportunities for high school players, who may instead start looking at DII schools such as Ferris State. From there, Annese is betting that the program’s success of winning championships and graduating players can help with roster continuity.

“Our hope is to be so profoundly connected with young people that you get them to just want to be part of your program,” Annese said “Some of our better players are so loyal, and they could move on, but they’re just so loyal…From my perspective, our culture is the best in the nation. That’s my selling point. Some of them may not believe that, but that’s just the way I approach it.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timcasey/2025/10/15/how-ferris-state-remains-division-iis-dominant-program-in-nil-and-transfer-portal-era/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

CaaS: The "SaaS Moment" for Blockchain

Source: VeradiVerdict Compiled by: Zhou, ChainCatcher Summary Crypto as a Service (CaaS) is the "Software as a Service (SaaS) era" in the blockchain space. Banks and fintech companies no longer need to build crypto infrastructure from scratch. They can simply connect to APIs and white-label platforms to launch digital asset functionality within days or weeks, instead of the years that used to take. ( Note: White-labeling essentially involves one party providing a product or technology, while another party brands it for sale or operation. In the finance/crypto field, this refers to banks or exchanges using third-party trading systems, wallets, or payment gateways and then rebranding them.) Mainstream markets are accelerating adoption through three channels. Banks are partnering with custodians like Coinbase, Anchorage, and BitGo while actively exploring tokenized assets; fintech companies are issuing their own stablecoins using platforms like M^0; and payment processors such as Western Union (with $300 billion in annual transactions) and Zelle (with over $1 trillion in annual transactions) are now integrating stablecoins to enable instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. Crypto as a Service (CaaS) isn't actually that complicated. Essentially, it's Software as a Service (SaaS) based on cryptocurrency, making it a hundred times easier for institutions and businesses to integrate into the cryptocurrency space. Banks, fintech companies, and enterprises no longer need to painstakingly build internal cryptocurrency functionality. Instead, they can simply plug and play, deploying within days using proven APIs and white-label platforms. Businesses can focus on their customers without worrying about the complexities of blockchain. They can leverage existing infrastructure to participate in cryptocurrency transactions more efficiently and cost-effectively. In other words, they can easily and seamlessly integrate into the digital asset ecosystem. CaaS is poised for exponential growth. CaaS is a cloud-based business model and infrastructure solution that enables businesses, fintech companies, and developers to integrate cryptocurrency and blockchain functionality into their operations without having to build or maintain the underlying technology from scratch. CaaS provides ready-to-use, scalable services, typically delivered via APIs or white-label platforms, such as crypto wallets, trading engines, payment gateways, asset storage, custody, and compliance tools. This allows businesses to quickly offer digital asset functionality under their own brand, reducing development costs, time, and required technical expertise. Like other "as-a-service" offerings, this model allows businesses of all sizes, from startups to established companies, to participate in a cost-effective manner. In September 2025, Coinbase Institutional listed CaaS as one of its biggest growth areas. Since 2013, Pantera Capital has been committed to driving the development of CaaS through investment. We strategically invest in infrastructure, tools, and technology to ensure that CaaS can operate at scale. By accelerating the development of backend fund management, custody, and wallets, we have significantly enhanced the service tier of CaaS. Advantages of CaaS By using CaaS to transparently integrate encryption capabilities into their systems, enterprises can achieve numerous strategic and operational advantages more quickly and cost-effectively. These advantages include: One-stop integration and seamless embedding : The CaaS platform eliminates the need for custom development cycles, enabling teams to activate features in days rather than months. Flexible profit models : Businesses can choose a subscription-based fixed-price model for predictable costs, or a pay-as-you-go billing model to keep expenses in line with revenue. Either approach avoids large upfront capital investments. Outsourcing blockchain complexity : Enterprises can offload technical management while benefiting from a powerful enterprise-grade backend, ensuring near-perfect uptime, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover. Developer-friendly APIs and SDKs : Developers can embed wallet creation and key management functions, smoothly handle on-chain settlements, trigger smart contract interactions, and create a comprehensive sandbox environment. White-label branding and an intuitive interface : The CaaS solution is easy to customize, enabling non-technical teams to configure free infrastructure, supported assets, and user onboarding processes. Other value-added features : Leading providers bundle ancillary services together, such as fraud detection based on on-chain analytics; automated tax filing; multi-signature fund management; and cross-chain bridging for asset interoperability. These characteristics transform cryptocurrency from a technological novelty into a revenue-generating product line while maintaining a focus on core business capabilities. Three core use cases We believe the world is rapidly evolving towards a cryptocurrency-native environment, with individuals and businesses interacting more frequently with digital assets. This shift is driven by increasing user acceptance of blockchain wallets, decentralized applications, and on-chain transactions, which in turn benefits from continuously improving user interfaces, abundant educational resources, and practical application value. However, for cryptocurrencies to truly integrate into the mainstream and achieve widespread adoption, a strong and seamless bridge must be built to bridge the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). Institutions seek the advantages of cryptocurrencies (speed, programmability, and global accessibility) while relying on trustworthy intermediaries to manage their underlying complexities: tools, security, technology stack, and liquidity provision. Ultimately, this ecosystem integration could gradually bring billions of users onto the blockchain. Use Case 1: Bank Banks are increasingly partnering with regulated cryptocurrency custodians such as Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo to provide institutional-grade custody, insured storage, and seamless spot trading services for digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These foundational services—custody, execution, and basic lending—represent the most readily achievable aspects of cryptocurrency integration, enabling banks to easily embrace customers without forcing them out of the traditional banking system. Beyond these fundamental elements, banks can leverage decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols to generate competitive returns from idle treasury assets or customer deposits. For example, they can deploy stablecoins into permissionless lending markets (such as Morpho, Aave, or Compound) or liquidity pools of automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap to obtain real-time, transparent returns that typically outperform traditional fixed-income products. The tokenization of Real-World Assets (RWAs) presents transformative opportunities. Banks can initiate and distribute on-chain versions of traditional securities (e.g., tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, private credit, or even real estate funds issued through BlackRock's BUIDL fund), bringing off-chain value to public blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, or Base. These RWAs can then be traded peer-to-peer through DeFi protocols such as Morpho (for optimizing lending), Pendle (for yield sharing), or Centrifuge (for private credit pools), while ensuring KYC/AML compliance through whitelisted wallets or institutional vaults. RWAs can also serve as high-quality collateral in the DeFi lending market. Crucially, banks can offer seamless stablecoin access without losing customers. Through embedded wallets or custodial sub-accounts, customers can hold USDC, USDT, or FDIC-insured digital dollars directly within the bank's app (for payments, remittances, or yield-generating investments) without leaving the bank's ecosystem. This "walled garden" model resembles a new bank but with regulated trust. Looking ahead, major banks may form alliances to issue branded stablecoins backed 1:1 by centralized reserves. These stablecoins could be settled instantly on public blockchains while complying with regulatory requirements, thus connecting traditional finance with programmable money. If a bank views blockchain as infrastructure, rather than an accessory tool, it is likely to capture the next trillion dollars in value. Use Case 2: Fintech Companies and New Types of Banks Fintech companies and new-age banks are rapidly integrating cryptocurrencies into their core offerings through strategic partnerships with established platforms such as Robinhood, Revolut, and Webull. These collaborations enable seamless use and secure custody of digital assets, while providing instant trading of tokenized versions of traditional stocks, effectively bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain-based markets. Beyond partnerships, fintech companies can leverage professional service providers like Alchemy to build and launch their own blockchain infrastructure. Alchemy, a leader in blockchain development platforms, offers scalable node infrastructure, enhanced APIs, and developer tools that simplify the creation of custom Layer-1 or Layer-2 networks. This allows fintech companies to tailor blockchains for specific use cases, such as high-throughput payments, decentralized authentication, or RWA (Risk Weighted Authorization), while ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements and optimizing for low latency and cost-effectiveness. Fintech companies can further deepen their involvement in the cryptocurrency space by issuing their own stablecoins and leveraging decentralized protocols on platforms like M^0 to mint yielding, fungible stablecoins backed by high-quality collateral such as US Treasury bonds. By adopting this model, fintech companies can mint their own tokens on demand, maintain full control over the underlying economic mechanisms (including interest accumulation and redemption mechanisms), ensure regulatory compliance through transparent on-chain reserves, and participate in co-governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). Furthermore, they can benefit from enhanced liquidity pools on major exchanges and DeFi protocols, reducing fragmentation and increasing user adoption. This approach not only creates new revenue streams but also positions fintech companies as innovators in the field of programmable money and fosters customer loyalty in the competitive digital economy. Use Case 3: Payment Processor Payment companies are building stablecoin "sandwiches": a multi-tiered cross-border settlement system that receives fiat currency at one end and exports instant, low-cost liquidity in another jurisdiction, while minimizing foreign exchange spreads, intermediary fees, and settlement delays. The components of the "sandwich" include: Top Slice (Entry Point) : US customers send US dollars to payment providers such as Stripe, Circle, Ripple, or newer banks like Mercury. Filling (minting) : US dollars are immediately exchanged at a 1:1 ratio for regulated stablecoins—usually USDC (Circle), USDP (Paxos), or bank-issued digital dollars. Bottom Slice (Export) : Stablecoins are bridged or exchanged for local currency stablecoins—for example, aARS (pegged to the Argentine peso), BRLA (Brazil), or MXNA (Mexico)—or become central bank digital currency pilot projects directly (for example, Drex in Brazil). Settlement : Funds arrive in local bank accounts, mobile wallets or merchant payments on a T+0 (instant) basis, with total costs typically below 0.1%, compared to 3-7% through SWIFT + agent banks. Western Union, a 175-year-old remittance giant that processes over $300 billion in remittances annually, recently announced the integration of stablecoins into its ecosystem. Pantera Capital CEO Devin McGranahan stated in July 2025 that the company had historically been "cautious" about cryptocurrencies, concerned about their volatility and regulatory issues. However, the enactment of the Genius Act has changed this. “As the rules become clearer, we see a real opportunity to integrate digital assets into our business,” McGranahan said on the Q3 2025 earnings call. The result: Western Union is currently actively testing stablecoin solutions for Treasury settlements and customer payments, leveraging blockchain technology to eliminate the cumbersome processes of correspondent banking. Zelle, a bank-backed peer-to-peer payment giant (part of Early Warning Services, a consortium of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and others), facilitates over $1 trillion in fee-free transfers annually within the United States via simple phone numbers or email addresses, currently boasting over 2,300 partner institutions and 150 million users. However, cross-border payments have been a previous challenge. On October 24, 2025, Early Warning announced a stablecoin plan aimed at bringing Zelle to the international market, offering "the same speed and reliability" overseas. As banks, fintech/new banks, and payment processors integrate cryptocurrencies in an intuitive, plug-and-play, and compliant manner (with as few regulators as possible), they can continue to expand their global reach and strengthen relationships. in conclusion CaaS is not hype—it represents a revolution in infrastructure that makes cryptocurrencies invisible to end users. Just as people don't think of AWS when watching Netflix or Salesforce when checking a CRM, consumers and businesses won't think of blockchain when making instant cross-border payments or accessing tokenized assets. The winners of this revolution are not companies that add cryptocurrencies as an afterthought to traditional systems, but rather institutions and enterprises that see blockchain as infrastructure, and the investors who support the underlying technology that underpins it all.
Share
PANews2025/11/05 16:00
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39