The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent… The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent…

Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth

2025/11/02 09:44


Ted Hisokawa
Nov 01, 2025 12:56

International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves.

Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews.

Understanding Basel’s Current Framework

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services.

Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision.

Calls for Regulatory Revisions

The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies.

In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent solutions are developed. The European Central Bank supports implementing existing rules first, while the U.S. and other regions are seeking revisions before these standards become mandatory.

Global Divergence and Future Outlook

While Basel Committee guidelines are non-binding, member jurisdictions typically adopt them. However, timelines vary, with Singapore delaying its implementation to ensure global alignment, and Hong Kong planning to introduce lighter requirements for licensed stablecoins in 2026.

The debate over crypto banking rules is intensifying as industry groups urge the Basel Committee to ease the capital burden on banks. These discussions are crucial as stablecoins could significantly impact global finance, with some reports predicting a potential $1 trillion shift from traditional banks to stablecoins by 2028.

As regulators and industry stakeholders continue to negotiate, the evolution of these rules will likely shape the future landscape of digital asset services in the banking sector.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/global-regulators-reevaluate-crypto-banking-rules-stablecoin-growth

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00