The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is reportedly considering establishing rules for cryptocurrency asset transfers to enhance financial reporting and provide clarity in the space. Notably, the independent nonprofit organization arrived at this decision after noticing that regulations for recognizing and reporting cryptocurrencies were unclear. This resulted in the inaccuracy of financial reports, according to […]The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is reportedly considering establishing rules for cryptocurrency asset transfers to enhance financial reporting and provide clarity in the space. Notably, the independent nonprofit organization arrived at this decision after noticing that regulations for recognizing and reporting cryptocurrencies were unclear. This resulted in the inaccuracy of financial reports, according to […]

FASB considering new rules for how companies report crypto asset transactions

2025/11/14 21:16

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is reportedly considering establishing rules for cryptocurrency asset transfers to enhance financial reporting and provide clarity in the space.

Notably, the independent nonprofit organization arrived at this decision after noticing that regulations for recognizing and reporting cryptocurrencies were unclear. This resulted in the inaccuracy of financial reports, according to the FASB.

Therefore, with this review in place, sources pointed out that the non-profit organization is committed to improving the current financial reporting practices and addressing existing challenges. 

Washington calls for more rules and transparency for digital assets

The FASB’s recent move has sparked debates among individuals in the crypto space, with many wondering when these amendments will take place. To address this controversy, a source close to the matter highlighted that the FASB’s discussions focus on the possibility of broadening the framework established in 2023. This framework offered initial guidance for crypto assets.

Under the framework established in 2023, the FASB released ASU 2023-08, which outlined the accounting and disclosure requirements for specific crypto assets. Reports indicate that these new guidelines require organizations to evaluate certain crypto assets at fair value over time, with any adjustments in this value reflected in net income at each reporting period.

Moreover, organizations were required to provide more information regarding their holdings of specific crypto assets. These changes were initially scheduled to take effect for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2024, including the interim periods within those years, and would affect all organizations.

However, reports with this information pointed out that organizations that preferred to adopt these amendments early were given the chance to do so. According to established guidelines, if an entity decides to implement changes during the interim period, it must initiate these changes at the beginning of the fiscal year that encompasses that period.

These guidelines were successfully implemented in response to the White House’s call for greater clarity on cryptocurrencies. 

Meanwhile, regarding FASB’s recent considerations, reliable sources reported that Richard Jones, the chair of FASB, stated that the board has added a new initiative to its research plans. He also revealed that this new project will concentrate on how businesses need to account for their digital assets.

This decision, according to Jones, not only suggested an internal affair but “a recent recommendation from the President’s Working Group on digital asset markets.” Several analysts also weighed in on the matter, stating that this situation reflected the mounting pressure from Washington for more regulations and clarity in the rapidly expanding digital economy.

FASB faces criticism for omitting key elements in the crypto industry 

By possibly revealing its rules to the public, analysts anticipate that the FASB would bolster its guidelines linked to crypto assets. This highlights the importance of robust accounting standards in a rapidly evolving financial world.

While several individuals praised FASB’s recent moves, some have criticized the non-profit organization’s new rules, arguing that it omitted important elements such as specific “governance” tokens, wrapped tokens, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in the crypto industry. 

On the other hand, investors are paying keen attention to clearer rules that guide them on how to report their crypto asset transfers in their financial statements. Furthermore, sources noted that they are seeking better investment options, acknowledging the need for greater uniformity and clarity in financial reporting.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37