Ethereum Foundation’s endorsement of Chainlink’s ACE signals growing institutional trust in privacy-focused compliance for tokenized assets. ACE merges on-chain identity checks with off-chain privacy tools, enabling regulated blockchain operations. Chainlink’s Automated Compliance Engine (ACE) has received formal recognition from the Ethereum Foundation, now being considered a top privacy and compliance solution for institutions building on [...]]]>Ethereum Foundation’s endorsement of Chainlink’s ACE signals growing institutional trust in privacy-focused compliance for tokenized assets. ACE merges on-chain identity checks with off-chain privacy tools, enabling regulated blockchain operations. Chainlink’s Automated Compliance Engine (ACE) has received formal recognition from the Ethereum Foundation, now being considered a top privacy and compliance solution for institutions building on [...]]]>

Ethereum Foundation Highlights Chainlink as Key Privacy and Compliance Partner for Institutional Adoption

2025/10/31 22:13
  • Ethereum Foundation’s endorsement of Chainlink’s ACE signals growing institutional trust in privacy-focused compliance for tokenized assets.
  • ACE merges on-chain identity checks with off-chain privacy tools, enabling regulated blockchain operations.

Chainlink’s Automated Compliance Engine (ACE) has received formal recognition from the Ethereum Foundation, now being considered a top privacy and compliance solution for institutions building on Ethereum.

This endorsement reflects increasing attention on regulatory requirements tied to tokenized assets as their presence grows across global financial markets.

ACE uses the ERC-3643 token standard, and it includes identity checks and rule enforcement directly inside the token’s design. This helps users and issuing organizations meet KYC and AML requirements when they trade on public blockchain networks. It allows organizations to stay transparent while following regulated systems.

This tool is built to handle compliance work both on and off the blockchain. It checks identities, manages the token life cycle, and maintains privacy at every stage of asset issuance and exchange. Many financial service providers see ACE as a base for combining privacy and compliance in their blockchain operations.

Privacy Without Compromising Regulation

One of ACE’s main strengths is its privacy-preserving identity verification. Through this process, companies can check that the credentials are valid without revealing personal details. They use cryptographic proof for verification, so personal data does not go on the blockchain.

Because of this, businesses with strict compliance and data protection rules are interested in using it.

Apex Group works with Chainlink’s institutional partners to support tokenization through practical frameworks. Their goal is to bring a regulated digital asset system to the market. The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) is also part of this effort, adding its verified legal identity system (vLEIs) to ACE.

Chainlink Labs had developed earlier privacy tools before ACE, such as DECO, a zero-knowledge proof protocol that verified the authenticity of data without exposing the data itself. These early innovations helped form the privacy features in ACE, which are now rolled out with a stronger focus on compliance.

Shared Identity Across Blockchain Networks

ACE also includes a Cross-Chain Identity (CCID) framework. This part stores cryptographic proofs of verified identities instead of a user’s actual data. With this system, people and companies can use their verified credentials on different platforms without going through registration again and without exposing their personal information.

GLEIF’s vLEI helps build real trust between organizations in the blockchain world. These digital IDs let auditors and regulators find which legal entities are part of a transaction without affecting privacy. This way, both monitoring and confidentiality stay in balance.

The ACE system is designed to meet both compliance and practical needs. It combines privacy protection with identity management to help token issuers follow international regulations while keeping users’ sensitive information safe from exposure.

Chainlink kept growing its work in this field over time. At first, the project became known for giving decentralized data through oracles. Later, it expanded its reach by building a privacy infrastructure under DECO. That early work formed the base for ACE, which now brings several tools together under one compliance system.

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05