Balancer was exploited on multiple chains, through interactions with smart contracts. The decentralized market lost $116M, mostly in wrapped ETH.Balancer was exploited on multiple chains, through interactions with smart contracts. The decentralized market lost $116M, mostly in wrapped ETH.

Balancer suffers $116M exploit targeting wrapped ETH

2025/11/03 18:21

Balancer, one of the oldest DeFi protocols, has been exploited on multiple chains. Within an hour, the estimated losses expanded from $70M to over $116M. 

Balancer was the target of the most recent attack against DeFi, targeting wrapped ETH and other assets on multiple chains. The initial estimates were for losses of $70M, but the attack was ongoing, quickly reaching $116M. 

The Balancer attack arrived after several relatively quiet months, when hackers selected more obscure protocols. Balancer may line up among the biggest DeFi hacks for 2025. Soon after the exploit, a whale dormant for over three years moved in to withdraw the entire stake from Balancer. 

As DeFi protocols remain more popular for passive yield, they also become more attractive for hackers. 

Balancer was exploited for $91M on the Ethereum L1 chain, though assets were also taken on Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism. Soon after the initial attack, the hacker started splitting the assets to new wallets.

Balancer exploited through ongoing smart contract interactions

The current Balancer hack may be due to a flawed smart contract, which allowed the attacker to mint unauthorized tokens. Some of the token interactions included functions like ‘approve infinite wstETH’. 

Balancer hit with $116M drain, targeting wrapped ETH.Balancer vaults were attacked with calls to send unauthorized tokens. | Source: DeBank.

The Balancer attack wallet was identified, currently holding multiple versions of wrapped ETH on several chains. The coins have not been unwrapped or traded. If the hacker decides to swap some of the assets, this may further exacerbate problems with other DeFi protocols, or crash the price of ETH. 

Following the hack, ETH traded at $3,735.04. ETH remains a frequently attacked asset, due to the ease of swapping, trading, or mixing. 

The Balancer exploit arrived just days after a smaller theft of $5.5M from the Garden Finance bridge. As Cryptopolitan reported, in the whole month of September, 20 thefts led to a total loss of $127M

Balancer V2 pools were affected

Following the attack, Balancer reacted on Discord, stating that mostly V2 pools were affected. Balancer V2 carries relatively limited volumes, though the DEX reported an anomaly of $26B traded in the past 24 hours, based on CoinGecko data. Balancer announced it is working with security experts on the next step. 

According to the exchange team, V3 remains unaffected, though there are conflicting data that the hacker attempted to break multiple vaults. Currently, V2 is still leading in terms of volumes, though V3 attempts to become the main trading venue with growing stablecoin activity. 

Balancer activity has remained relatively low compared to newer DEXs and DeFi platforms. The chain locked in $678M, down from a peak $3.11B in 2022. The platform attempted to renew its influence during the latest bull cycle. 

The hack hardly affected the BAL native token, which is traded on low volumes and has lost over 99% of its value since launch. 

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00