The post Alibaba-linked Ant Group files AntCoin trademark application in Hong Kong appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Alibaba affiliate fintech giant Ant Group, the parent company of Alipay, filed a trademark application in June for AntCoin in Hong Kong. However, the filing was only recently spotted in Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department database. The initiative suggests that the firm plans to expand into blockchain-based financial services and stablecoins. The June filing comes just days before Ant Group Chairman Eric Jing is scheduled to speak alongside Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services Christopher Hui and Primavera Capital’s Fred Hu at next week’s Hong Kong Fin Tech Week. The event will have a crypto-heavy agenda compared to its usual tradFi-focused agenda. Ant Group’s trademark spans across all major financial activities JUST IN: 🇨🇳 Alibaba’s Ant Group has filed a trademark for “AntCoin” in Hong Kong. pic.twitter.com/H9iXX5BBFN — Cryptopolitan (@CPOfficialtx) October 27, 2025 According to AntCoin’s filing, the trademark specification spans nearly all major financial activities, including traditional banking, lending, and FX to blockchain-based settlement, stablecoin issuance, digital-asset custody, and loyalty rewards. The proposal will position the firm as a bridge between Ant’s payments ecosystem and Hong Kong’s regulated Web3 economy. Ant Group’s trademark licence doesn’t reveal whether the company plans to launch a token or stablecoin. However, it sets legal protection for the firm across financial services, including both traditional finance and emerging blockchain technologies. The trademark, filed with Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department, comes with a comprehensive approach that gives Ant Group flexibility in how it might use the AntCoin brand. The firm is yet to issue public statements about the specific plans for AntCoin. Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, said that Ant Group’s initiative to file for trademarks appears as a strategic move to protect its interests in the mainland’s digital asset industry. He also argued that Ant Group’s next move would broaden… The post Alibaba-linked Ant Group files AntCoin trademark application in Hong Kong appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Alibaba affiliate fintech giant Ant Group, the parent company of Alipay, filed a trademark application in June for AntCoin in Hong Kong. However, the filing was only recently spotted in Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department database. The initiative suggests that the firm plans to expand into blockchain-based financial services and stablecoins. The June filing comes just days before Ant Group Chairman Eric Jing is scheduled to speak alongside Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services Christopher Hui and Primavera Capital’s Fred Hu at next week’s Hong Kong Fin Tech Week. The event will have a crypto-heavy agenda compared to its usual tradFi-focused agenda. Ant Group’s trademark spans across all major financial activities JUST IN: 🇨🇳 Alibaba’s Ant Group has filed a trademark for “AntCoin” in Hong Kong. pic.twitter.com/H9iXX5BBFN — Cryptopolitan (@CPOfficialtx) October 27, 2025 According to AntCoin’s filing, the trademark specification spans nearly all major financial activities, including traditional banking, lending, and FX to blockchain-based settlement, stablecoin issuance, digital-asset custody, and loyalty rewards. The proposal will position the firm as a bridge between Ant’s payments ecosystem and Hong Kong’s regulated Web3 economy. Ant Group’s trademark licence doesn’t reveal whether the company plans to launch a token or stablecoin. However, it sets legal protection for the firm across financial services, including both traditional finance and emerging blockchain technologies. The trademark, filed with Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department, comes with a comprehensive approach that gives Ant Group flexibility in how it might use the AntCoin brand. The firm is yet to issue public statements about the specific plans for AntCoin. Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, said that Ant Group’s initiative to file for trademarks appears as a strategic move to protect its interests in the mainland’s digital asset industry. He also argued that Ant Group’s next move would broaden…

Alibaba-linked Ant Group files AntCoin trademark application in Hong Kong

2025/10/27 21:17

Alibaba affiliate fintech giant Ant Group, the parent company of Alipay, filed a trademark application in June for AntCoin in Hong Kong. However, the filing was only recently spotted in Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department database. The initiative suggests that the firm plans to expand into blockchain-based financial services and stablecoins.

The June filing comes just days before Ant Group Chairman Eric Jing is scheduled to speak alongside Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services Christopher Hui and Primavera Capital’s Fred Hu at next week’s Hong Kong Fin Tech Week. The event will have a crypto-heavy agenda compared to its usual tradFi-focused agenda.

Ant Group’s trademark spans across all major financial activities

According to AntCoin’s filing, the trademark specification spans nearly all major financial activities, including traditional banking, lending, and FX to blockchain-based settlement, stablecoin issuance, digital-asset custody, and loyalty rewards. The proposal will position the firm as a bridge between Ant’s payments ecosystem and Hong Kong’s regulated Web3 economy.

Ant Group’s trademark licence doesn’t reveal whether the company plans to launch a token or stablecoin. However, it sets legal protection for the firm across financial services, including both traditional finance and emerging blockchain technologies.

The trademark, filed with Hong Kong’s Intellectual Property Department, comes with a comprehensive approach that gives Ant Group flexibility in how it might use the AntCoin brand. The firm is yet to issue public statements about the specific plans for AntCoin.

Joshua Chu, co-chair of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, said that Ant Group’s initiative to file for trademarks appears as a strategic move to protect its interests in the mainland’s digital asset industry. He also argued that Ant Group’s next move would broaden its decisions about resolving issues, which Chu noted had caused the firm’s ambitions to be frozen in the first place.

Chu also cautioned that there have been instances where unauthorized or fraudulent tokens impersonate tokens like USDT without actually being issued by Tether. He also warned that other scammers have created tokens on various blockchains that use similar names, symbols, or contact addresses to appear legitimate.

Chu also revealed that there are high-fidelity copycat contracts in the crypto sector that can deceive users into believing they hold actual stablecoins. He argued that such operations are among the risks that stablecoin firms, such as Ant Group, which are looking to establish a business in Hong Kong, would face. Chu maintained that trademark protection is a prudent and essential part of risk management.

Ant Group has been steadily adopting blockchain and digital infrastructure over the years, including a partnership with Circle in July. The firm revealed that the collaboration aimed to pilot USDC-based cross-border payments between Ant International’s Alipay network and select global merchants.

Ant Group and JD.com pause stablecoin initiatives

Ant Group’s trademark initiative is part of a series of moves by other Hong Kong-based tech firms, such as JD.com, that have been testing stablecoin pilots in the mainland. The tech company also launched its new digital asset licensing framework in August.

Last week, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and the Cyberspace Administration of China ordered Ant Group and JD.com to pause their plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong amid heightened U.S.-China trade tensions. Both firms were planning to participate in Beijing’s new stablecoin pilot program, as part of its plan to establish itself as Asia’s regulated crypto hub.

Hong Kong had already established the licensing framework for fiat-backed stablecoins in August. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority stated that the new laws are designed to create a legal framework for token issuers to operate. 

Ant Group announced in June plans to seek stablecoin licenses in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Luxembourg, furthering its efforts to expand cross-border. The initiative follows Hong Kong’s legislature passing a stablecoin bill in May that provided regulatory clarity for fiat-based stablecoin issuers in the country. The new regulatory framework expects stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong to obtain a licence from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/ant-group-web3-expansion-hong-kong-trademark/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

Preliminary analysis of the Balancer V2 attack, which resulted in a loss of $120 million.

On November 3, the Balancer V2 protocol and its fork projects were attacked on multiple chains, resulting in a serious loss of more than $120 million. BlockSec issued an early warning at the first opportunity [1] and gave a preliminary analysis conclusion [2]. This was a highly complex attack. Our preliminary analysis showed that the root cause was that the attacker manipulated the invariant, thereby distorting the calculation of the price of BPT (Balancer Pool Token) -- that is, the LP token of Balancer Pool -- so that it could profit in a stable pool through a batchSwap operation. Background Information 1. Scaling and Rounding To standardize the decimal places of different tokens, the Balancer contract will: upscale: Upscales the balance and amount to a uniform internal precision before performing the calculation; downscale: Reduces the result to its original precision and performs directional rounding (e.g., inputs are usually rounded up to ensure the pool is not under-filled; output paths are often truncated downwards). Conclusion: Within the same transaction, the asymmetrical rounding direction used in different stages can lead to a systematic slight deviation when executed repeatedly in very small steps. 2. Prices of D and BPT The Balancer V2 protocol’s Composable Stable Pool[3] and the fork protocol were affected by this attack. Stable Pool is used for assets that are expected to maintain a close 1:1 exchange ratio (or be exchanged at a known exchange rate), allowing large exchanges without causing significant price shocks, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of capital utilization between similar or related assets. The pool uses the Stable Math (a Curve-based StableSwap model), where the invariant D represents the pool's "virtual total value". The approximate price of BPT (Pool's LP Token) is: The formula above shows that if D is made smaller on paper (even if no funds are actually withdrawn), the price of BPT will be cheaper. BTP represents the pool share and is used to calculate how many pool reserves can be obtained when withdrawing liquidity. Therefore, if an attacker can obtain more BPT, they can profit when withdrawing liquidity. Attack Analysis Taking an attack transaction on Arbitrum as an example, the batchSwap operation can be divided into three stages: Phase 1: The attacker redeems BPT for the underlying asset to precisely adjust the balance of one of the tokens (cbETH) to a critical point (amount = 9) for rounding. This step sets the stage for the precision loss in the next phase. Phase Two: The attacker uses a carefully crafted quantity (= 8) to swap between another underlying asset (wstETH) and cbETH. Due to rounding down when scaling the token quantity, the calculated Δx is slightly smaller (from 8.918 to 8), causing Δy to be underestimated and the invariant D (derived from Curve's StableSwap model) to be smaller. Since BPT price = D / totalSupply, the BPT price is artificially suppressed. Phase 3: The attackers reverse-swap the underlying assets back to BPT, restoring the balance within the pool while profiting from the depressed price of BPT—acquiring more BPT tokens. Finally, the attacker used another profitable transaction to withdraw liquidity, thereby using the extra BPT to acquire other underlying assets (cbETH and wstETH) in the Pool and thus profit. Attacking the transaction: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x7da32ebc615d0f29a24cacf9d18254bea3a2c730084c690ee40238b1d8b55773 Profitable trades: https://app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/arbitrum/0x4e5be713d986bcf4afb2ba7362525622acf9c95310bd77cd5911e7ef12d871a9 Reference: [1]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985262010347696312 [2]https://x.com/Phalcon_xyz/status/1985302779263643915 [3]https://docs-v2.balancer.fi/concepts/pools/composable-stable.html
Share
PANews2025/11/04 14:00