The post A Disney ‘Star Wars’ Show Is Back With A 100% Rotten Tomatoes Score appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Star Wars: Visions Rotten Tomatoes As I think we all know by now, Disney’s governance of Star Wars since it bought it from George Lucas has been up and down. Up, with Andor and Rogue One, down with The Book of Boba Fett and I guess, take your pick of all the other movies. But there is one Disney+ Star Wars series that is rated higher than alnost all the rest, even Andor, somehow. That show is Star Wars: Visions, the catch being that it’s not a live-action series, but an animated anthology where different directors and animation studios give their short-form takes on Star Wars. And it’s pretty awesome. Star Wars: Visions is back as of this week for its third season, one that has scored 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, the same as season 2, and just above the 96% of season 1. Overall, it’s a 98% rated show over three seasons. The only thing topping it is the pure 100% of Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi, albeit that’s only one season. Outside of the Disney era, we have some 100% rated Clone Wars seasons and the 98% of Star Wars: Rebels, the older Filoni projects. Right now, in the Disney period, here’s how Star Wars: Visions ranks among all the other shows: Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi – 100% critic score Star Wars Visions – 98% Andor – 96% Skeleton Crew – 92% The Mandalorian – 90% Star Wars: The Bad Batch – 88% Ahsoka – 85% Obi-Wan Kenobi – 82% The Acolyte – 79% The Book of Boba Fett – 66% So yes, two out of the top three are animated, and the third is Andor. Quite a feat. Visions even had two shorts so popular they spawned their own upcoming series, The Ninth Jedi.… The post A Disney ‘Star Wars’ Show Is Back With A 100% Rotten Tomatoes Score appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Star Wars: Visions Rotten Tomatoes As I think we all know by now, Disney’s governance of Star Wars since it bought it from George Lucas has been up and down. Up, with Andor and Rogue One, down with The Book of Boba Fett and I guess, take your pick of all the other movies. But there is one Disney+ Star Wars series that is rated higher than alnost all the rest, even Andor, somehow. That show is Star Wars: Visions, the catch being that it’s not a live-action series, but an animated anthology where different directors and animation studios give their short-form takes on Star Wars. And it’s pretty awesome. Star Wars: Visions is back as of this week for its third season, one that has scored 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, the same as season 2, and just above the 96% of season 1. Overall, it’s a 98% rated show over three seasons. The only thing topping it is the pure 100% of Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi, albeit that’s only one season. Outside of the Disney era, we have some 100% rated Clone Wars seasons and the 98% of Star Wars: Rebels, the older Filoni projects. Right now, in the Disney period, here’s how Star Wars: Visions ranks among all the other shows: Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi – 100% critic score Star Wars Visions – 98% Andor – 96% Skeleton Crew – 92% The Mandalorian – 90% Star Wars: The Bad Batch – 88% Ahsoka – 85% Obi-Wan Kenobi – 82% The Acolyte – 79% The Book of Boba Fett – 66% So yes, two out of the top three are animated, and the third is Andor. Quite a feat. Visions even had two shorts so popular they spawned their own upcoming series, The Ninth Jedi.…

A Disney ‘Star Wars’ Show Is Back With A 100% Rotten Tomatoes Score

2025/11/01 00:18

Star Wars: Visions

Rotten Tomatoes

As I think we all know by now, Disney’s governance of Star Wars since it bought it from George Lucas has been up and down. Up, with Andor and Rogue One, down with The Book of Boba Fett and I guess, take your pick of all the other movies. But there is one Disney+ Star Wars series that is rated higher than alnost all the rest, even Andor, somehow.

That show is Star Wars: Visions, the catch being that it’s not a live-action series, but an animated anthology where different directors and animation studios give their short-form takes on Star Wars. And it’s pretty awesome.

Star Wars: Visions is back as of this week for its third season, one that has scored 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, the same as season 2, and just above the 96% of season 1. Overall, it’s a 98% rated show over three seasons. The only thing topping it is the pure 100% of Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi, albeit that’s only one season. Outside of the Disney era, we have some 100% rated Clone Wars seasons and the 98% of Star Wars: Rebels, the older Filoni projects. Right now, in the Disney period, here’s how Star Wars: Visions ranks among all the other shows:

  • Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi – 100% critic score
  • Star Wars Visions – 98%
  • Andor – 96%
  • Skeleton Crew – 92%
  • The Mandalorian – 90%
  • Star Wars: The Bad Batch – 88%
  • Ahsoka – 85%
  • Obi-Wan Kenobi – 82%
  • The Acolyte – 79%
  • The Book of Boba Fett – 66%

So yes, two out of the top three are animated, and the third is Andor. Quite a feat. Visions even had two shorts so popular they spawned their own upcoming series, The Ninth Jedi. And yes, there is another Ninth Jedi short in Visions season 3 here.

The Star Wars version of Love, Death and Robots and Secret Level is one of the best things Disney has greenlit after all this time. I do wonder how The Ninth Jedi is going to do, and no, I really do not think that Disney should turn it into live-action if that’s spinning around in their mind, as the animation is part of its appeal. The story, however, is one of the best we’ve seen in modern Star Wars as well, even if only a fraction of fans have seen it compared to the larger shows and movies.

Season 3 of Star Wars: Visions is live with nine new episodes, and if you have missed it so far, you can catch up with 18 more across the first two seasons. And sure, go watch Tales of the Jedi while you’re at it.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/10/31/a-disney-star-wars-show-is-back-with-a-100-rotten-tomatoes-score/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05