TLDR Investor lost $1.54M in phishing scam exploiting EIP-7702 batch transactions. Stolen assets included wstETH, cbBTC, and several other tokens. Scam used fake DeFi interfaces that mimicked real apps like Uniswap. Similar scams also drained $1M in NFTs earlier this week. A cryptocurrency investor has lost $1.54 million after signing phishing batch transactions tied to [...] The post Crypto Investor Hit by $1.54M Loss in Phishing Scam Using EIP-7702 appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Investor lost $1.54M in phishing scam exploiting EIP-7702 batch transactions. Stolen assets included wstETH, cbBTC, and several other tokens. Scam used fake DeFi interfaces that mimicked real apps like Uniswap. Similar scams also drained $1M in NFTs earlier this week. A cryptocurrency investor has lost $1.54 million after signing phishing batch transactions tied to [...] The post Crypto Investor Hit by $1.54M Loss in Phishing Scam Using EIP-7702 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Crypto Investor Hit by $1.54M Loss in Phishing Scam Using EIP-7702

2025/08/24 17:46
3 min read

TLDR

  • Investor lost $1.54M in phishing scam exploiting EIP-7702 batch transactions.
  • Stolen assets included wstETH, cbBTC, and several other tokens.

  • Scam used fake DeFi interfaces that mimicked real apps like Uniswap.

  • Similar scams also drained $1M in NFTs earlier this week.


A cryptocurrency investor has lost $1.54 million after signing phishing batch transactions tied to the EIP-7702 standard, according to anti-fraud service Scam Sniffer. The incident resulted in the theft of wrapped Ethereum (wstETH), wrapped Bitcoin (cbBTC), and several other tokens.

The attack exploited the batch transaction feature introduced under Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade. This feature allows multiple operations to be executed within a single transaction, improving efficiency for legitimate users but also opening new opportunities for exploitation.

How Crypto Scammers Used EIP-7702 to Trick Victims

The phishing scheme involved a fraudulent DeFi interface that mimicked platforms like Uniswap. Victims were prompted to approve transactions that appeared routine, but in reality, they authorized hidden transfers. Once approved, attackers drained the wallet almost instantly.

Scam Sniffer explained that many users are not yet aware of the risks tied to EIP-7702 because of its recent introduction. The malicious transactions were structured to appear normal, leaving unsuspecting users vulnerable to asset loss.

The fraud detection service reported that similar schemes have been recurring since the feature went live, with attackers targeting addresses upgraded under the new standard.

NFTs Among Assets Stolen in Similar Crypto Scams

Earlier this week, another investor lost around $1 million in NFTs and additional tokens under nearly identical circumstances. The transactions were disguised as Uniswap swaps but were instead phishing contracts designed to misappropriate funds.

A comparable incident was reported earlier this month, reinforcing concerns that EIP-7702 batch transaction phishing is becoming a recurring trend. Scam Sniffer confirmed, “We’ve spotted multiple victims with this pattern targeting EIP-7702 upgraded addresses.”

These reports indicate that the attackers are continuously exploiting user inexperience with new Ethereum transaction standards to maximize their gains.

Warnings and Ongoing Risks for Investors

Scam Sniffer has urged users to remain vigilant when approving batch transactions and to verify interfaces carefully before signing. Fake DeFi platforms designed to mirror legitimate services remain one of the most common attack vectors in the crypto sector.

The group emphasized that even though batch transactions improve user experience for legitimate applications, the added complexity increases the chance of abuse. Investors are advised to use trusted applications and double-check permissions granted during every transaction.

The post Crypto Investor Hit by $1.54M Loss in Phishing Scam Using EIP-7702 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16