A decade-old email is reviving questions about whether projects like Ripple posed a threat to Bitcoin’s development or merely served as competitors that some BTCA decade-old email is reviving questions about whether projects like Ripple posed a threat to Bitcoin’s development or merely served as competitors that some BTC

Epstein files reveal Bitcoin’s secret war as Ripple insiders expose a decade of explosive hidden industry sabotage

A decade-old email is reviving questions about whether projects like Ripple posed a threat to Bitcoin’s development or merely served as competitors that some BTC backers sought to exclude.

The email, dated July 31, 2014, appears to show Austin Hill, then described as Blockstream’s chief executive, telling the late Jeffrey Epstein and other recipients that “Ripple, and Jed McCaleb’s new Stellar [were] bad for the ecosystem.” Blockstream is a Bitcoin-focused blockchain technology firm.

The correspondence resurfaced after the US Department of Justice published millions of pages of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a disclosure that includes emails, files, images, and videos tied to past investigations.

What was in the email?

The email’s headline draw is obvious (as Jeffrey Epstein is a toxic magnet for attention), and Blockstream’s current leadership has moved quickly to deny any ongoing financial connection.

However, the more durable story is about the sender’s premise rather than the recipients' notoriety.

Austin Hill argued that capital flowing into Ripple and Stellar wasn’t merely competition. It was contamination. He viewed these projects as threats that could “damage” Bitcoin’s future by diluting investor alignment, developer focus, and narrative power.

To many maximalists of that era, the “ecosystem” was not a broad crypto category. It was Bitcoin, plus the infrastructure, that made the flagship digital asset more usable without compromising its ethos.

Thus, this worldview “justified” the specific pressure applied in the email.

However, XRP community members view the email as evidence that early Bitcoin insiders sought to divert capital from Ripple.

For context, XRP commentator Leonidas Hadjiloizou argued the email reads like an attempt to pressure investors to “pick a horse” and to reduce or withdraw a Blockstream allocation if they also backed Ripple or Stellar.

According to him:

Meanwhile, the resurfaced email has pulled in modern Ripple voices who lived through these early battles.

Ripple CTO emeritus David Schwartz said he “wouldn’t be at all surprised” if the email is “the tip of a giant iceberg,” arguing that:

In his view, standing against the supporters of rival networks as enemies hurts everyone in the space.

However, Schwartz also drew a boundary around what the email does not establish, noting there is no evidence of direct connections between Epstein and Ripple, XRP, or Stellar.

Is Ripple Really Bad for the Ecosystem?

The irony of Hill’s 2014 warning is that the “damage” he feared has arguably materialized, as Ripple has become a dominant force in the industry. In 2026, Ripple has not only survived but also entrenched itself as a regulated pillar of the crypto infrastructure.

However, this growth occurred without the catastrophic consequences for Bitcoin that maximalists originally predicted.

In fact, Ripple’s evolution over the last decade suggests that the “ecosystem” was always destined to be larger than just Bitcoin.

The firm’s most significant milestone came with the conclusion of its long-running battle with the SEC. The 2025 settlement, which saw the company pay a fraction of the regulator’s original demand, effectively cleared the regulatory cloud that had hung over the asset for years.

That legal clarity paved the way for the very thing early Bitcoiners feared: deep institutional integration.

Today, the company looks less like a “scam” and more like a bank with major licenses worldwide.

Moreover, Ripple has aggressively expanded its custody capabilities by acquiring Swiss-based Metaco and Standard Custody & Trust. It has also acquired major financial platforms like GTreasury, Hidden Road, and the stablecoin platform Rail.

Perhaps the strongest rebuttal to the “bad for the ecosystem” claim is the market’s acceptance of XRP as an institutional asset class.

The launch of XRP ETFs in late 2025, including offerings from issuers like Franklin Templeton, signaled that Wall Street no longer views the asset as “contamination.”

Instead, the inflows into these products suggest that for modern investors, the “ecosystem” is not a zero-sum game between Bitcoin and payments networks. It is a diversified portfolio where both “horses” can run.

Will Bitcoin and Ripple community members ever end their bickering?

Long before spot crypto ETFs and big-bank custody deals, the Bitcoin community fought public battles in forums over what counted as “good for the ecosystem.”

On Bitcointalk, one widely circulated 2013 thread framed Ripple as contrary to Bitcoin’s goals and criticized its structure and incentives, reflecting a strain of skepticism that later hardened into the “maximalist” worldview.

Those criticisms tended to cluster around a few themes: governance control, token distribution, whether a project’s economic model was “too company-led,” and whether its outreach to banks and regulators undercut Bitcoin’s political narrative.

However, supporters of Ripple and Stellar argued that faster settlement rails, lower transaction costs, and a focus on payments were practical features rather than ideological betrayals.

They contended that early Bitcoin discourse often conflated “different design” with “existential threat.”

Meanwhile, even if the 2014 email is primarily a time capsule, it maps onto a more recent political and policy conflict that has shifted the Bitcoin-versus-Ripple debate from forums to lobbying.

In early 2025, Jack Mallers, the co-founder and CEO of Twenty One Capital, argued that Ripple was actively lobbying to prevent a Bitcoin-only Strategic Reserve in the US while promoting its centralized, corporate-controlled XRP token.

According to him, XRP’s centralized nature conflicts with the goals of a strategic BTC reserve that are “pro-industry, pro-jobs, and pro-technology.”

That debate became more concrete when President Donald Trump said a US strategic crypto reserve would include XRP alongside Bitcoin and other major tokens.

The announcement sharpened an already familiar fault line: Bitcoin maximalists advocating a single-asset monetary reserve versus a multi-asset framework that benefits large US-linked token networks.

These issues explain why the Bitcoin and Ripple communities appear to be in outright loggerheads over the past years, despite the assets being two of the most popular cryptocurrencies globally.

However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse appears to be steering the XRP holders away from the “fights” by consistently urging cooperation and unity among industry players to help the emerging sector grow.

The post Epstein files reveal Bitcoin’s secret war as Ripple insiders expose a decade of explosive hidden industry sabotage appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UAE Authorizes AE Coin for Federal Government Payments

UAE Authorizes AE Coin for Federal Government Payments

UAE has officially authorized AE Coin for federal government payments.The initiative is expected to enhance smart government services, and secure payments. The
Share
Tronweekly2026/02/03 07:30
Exploring Market Buzz: Unique Opportunities in Cryptocurrencies

Exploring Market Buzz: Unique Opportunities in Cryptocurrencies

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies, recent developments have sparked significant interest. A closer look at pricing forecasts for Cardano (ADA) and rumors surrounding a Solana (SOL) ETF, coupled with the emergence of a promising new entrant, Layer Brett, reveals a complex market dynamic. Cardano's Prospects: A Closer Look Cardano, a stalwart in the blockchain space, continues to hold its ground with its research-driven development strategy. The latest price predictions for ADA suggest potential gains, predicting a double or even quadruple increase in its valuation. Despite these optimistic forecasts, the allure of exponential gains drives traders toward more speculative ventures. The Buzz Around Solana ETF The potential introduction of a Solana ETF has the crypto community abuzz, potentially catapulting SOL prices to new heights. As investors await regulatory decisions, the impact of such an ETF on Solana's value could be substantial, potentially reaching up to $300. However, as with Cardano, the substantial market capitalization of Solana may temper its growth potential. Why Layer Brett is Gaining Traction Amidst established names, a new contender, Layer Brett, has started to capture the market's attention with its early presale stages. Offering a low entry price of just $0.0058 and promising over 700% in staking rewards, Layer Brett presents a tempting proposition for those looking to maximize returns. Comparative Analysis: ADA, SOL, and $LBRETT While both ADA and SOL offer stable investment choices with reliable growth, Layer Brett emerges as a high-risk, high-reward option that could potentially offer significantly higher returns due to its nascent market position and aggressive economic model. Initial presale pricing lets investors get in on the ground floor. Staking rewards currently exceed 690%, a persuasive incentive for early adopters. Backed by Ethereum's Layer 2 for enhanced transaction speed and reduced costs. A community-focused $1 million giveaway to further drive engagement and investor interest. Predicted by some analysts to offer up to 50x returns in coming years. Shifting Sands: Investor Movements As the crypto market landscape shifts, many investors, including those traditionally holding ADA and SOL, are beginning to diversify their portfolios by turning to high-potential opportunities like Layer Brett. The combination of strategic presale pricing and significant staking rewards is creating a momentum of its own. Act Fast: Time-Sensitive Opportunities As September progresses, opportunities to capitalize on these low entry points and high yield offerings from Layer Brett are likely to diminish. With increasing attention and funds being directed towards this new asset, the window to act is closing quickly. Invest in Layer Brett now to secure your position before the next price hike and staking rewards reduction. For more information, visit the Layer Brett website, join their Telegram group, or follow them on X by clicking the following links: Website Telegram X Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Bitzo, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 18:39
Bank of England maintains UK interest rates at 4%

Bank of England maintains UK interest rates at 4%

The BOE remains committed to reducing the UK’s inflation to its target 2%.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 23:32