IOTA has based its “Blue Ocean” strategy on the tokenization of real-world assets, data, and identity for transactions. A graphic posted on social media contrastsIOTA has based its “Blue Ocean” strategy on the tokenization of real-world assets, data, and identity for transactions. A graphic posted on social media contrasts

IOTA’s Blue Ocean Strategy: Tokenizing Real-World Data, Assets, and Identity Onchain

  • IOTA has based its “Blue Ocean” strategy on the tokenization of real-world assets, data, and identity for transactions.
  • A graphic posted on social media contrasts DeFi/NFTs/gaming/memecoins with data, identity, payments, and trade finance as focus areas.

IOTA has presented a “Blue Ocean” strategy that frames its network as a venue for tokenizing and transacting real-world data, assets, and identity on-chain. The message on X was accompanied by a split graphic comparing “Red Ocean” crypto categories with a “Blue Ocean” set of use cases.

The graphic’s Red Ocean side lists crowded segments such as decentralized finance, NFTs, gaming, memecoins, AI tokens, generic real-world assets, and the long-running Layer 1 versus Layer 2 competition. It pairs these areas with labels that point to market friction, including fragmented ecosystems, no clear industry focus, and isolated use cases.

However, on the Blue Ocean side, IOTA places “Data” at the top, followed by “Identity,” “Payments,” and “Trade Finance” on a vertical track. A single vessel is shown advancing along the Blue Ocean path, reinforcing the idea of moving into less contested territory.

The contrast positions the network’s Blue Ocean Strategy around tokenization that starts with information and identity, then moves toward transaction rails. In the post’s framing, tokenized data and tokenized identity become inputs for on-chain commerce. Tokenized assets are treated as items that can be transferred and settled with clear records.

IOTA’s Focus Areas: Data, Identity, Payments, and Trade Finance

IOTA’s framework focuses on tokenization as a method of representation of off-chain information and claims as on-chain objects that can be traded. In this strategy, information can be bundled to be verified and exchanged. Moreover, payments are positioned as a bridge between tokenized items and settlement. By placing payments in the same stack as identity and data, the visual points to transactions that may require context, authentication, and traceability. 

Trade finance appears as the endpoint of the sequence, indicating a target for tokenized documentation and on-chain settlement coordination in commercial flows. IOTA describes the Blue Ocean as “a new market” where these elements are tokenized and transacted on-chain. 

The announcement aligns the strategy with practical categories that are commonly associated with enterprise integrations, compliance processes, and cross-party coordination. Additionally, yesterday, co-founder Dominik Schiener said the project is working to bring the $35 trillion global trade economy on-chain using tokenized assets, digital identity, and data integrity.

The IOTA token trades at $0.0885, gaining 1% in the past day, although its volume dipped and remains low at just $12.4 million.

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15