The post Are Perp DEXs a Threat to Centralized Exchanges In 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Perpetual decentralized exchanges (perp DEXs) gained strongThe post Are Perp DEXs a Threat to Centralized Exchanges In 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Perpetual decentralized exchanges (perp DEXs) gained strong

Are Perp DEXs a Threat to Centralized Exchanges In 2026?

5 min read

Perpetual decentralized exchanges (perp DEXs) gained strong traction in 2025. Trading activity expanded, and new platforms entered the space seeking to capitalize on the momentum. 

With perp DEXs continuing to capture a meaningful and growing share of derivatives activity, questions are emerging about how this evolution could reshape the broader trading landscape. BeInCrypto spoke with MEXC COO Vugar Usi Zade to examine whether Perp DEXs pose a meaningful challenge to centralized exchanges (CEXs) and what this shift may signal for their long-term role.

The Rise of Perp DEXs 

Perpetual DEXs are decentralized, self-custodial platforms that operate 24/7 and allow traders to go long or short crypto assets using leverage with no expiry dates.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The model’s popularity increased due to tighter regulation of centralized exchanges, major improvements in DEX execution and user experience that mimic their centralized counterparts, the rise of a hyper-financialized trading culture, and a revenue meta in which projects directly accrue value through fees and token buybacks.

A recent CoinGecko report highlighted the rapid rise of perpetual DEX activity relative to centralized platforms. According to the data, the DEX-to-CEX perps ratio rose from 2.1% in early 2023 to 11.7% by November 2025. 

CoinGecko also revealed that November marked the 14th straight month of month-over-month growth in the DEX-to-CEX perps volume ratio.

This momentum is further reflected in trading volumes. Perpetual DEX activity reached a record $903.56 billion in October, more than ten times higher than the same period a year earlier.

According to the latest data from DefiLama, Hyperliquid, Aster, and Lighter maintain the lead as the top three perpetual DEXs by trading volume.

Perp DEXs vs. CEXs: Which Model Is Really Winning?

The rapid expansion of on-chain alternatives raises an important question: Does this trend signal a lasting structural shift or merely a temporary response to market conditions?

According to Usi Zade, the growth reflects an evolution in trader behavior rather than a full paradigm shift. He added that current data still shows centralized exchanges firmly dominating derivatives flows. Their core strengths in deep liquidity and institutional trust remain intact.

Sponsored

Sponsored

When asked whether perpetual DEXs offer advantages over centralized exchanges, Usi Zade highlighted transparency as a key differentiator. He explained that these platforms allow users to verify positions, collateral, and liquidation mechanisms in real time.

Usi Zade also emphasized that transparency is increasingly becoming non-negotiable for traders, particularly those who have witnessed or experienced exchange failures firsthand.

Beyond transparency, Usi Zade also pointed to permissionless access as an area where DEXs hold an edge. However, he emphasized that centralized exchanges operate within strict regulatory frameworks that prioritize compliance and user protection.

Furthermore, he noted that on-chain access is another reason traders are drawn to perp DEXs, as they can pass identity checks with no regional restrictions or account limitations. These capabilities become necessary when there’s a regulatory tightening period.

While the advantages are notable, there are still areas where decentralized exchanges lag behind. Usi Zade pointed out that liquidity concentration and execution quality remain the most significant challenges for DEXs. 

Although decentralized platforms have seen strong growth, they still operate with smaller capital bases. Thus, this can impact funding rates, depth, and overall market endurance.

Sponsored

Sponsored

He said that DEX’s risk management also presents a limitation due to its rigid liquidation system.

Lastly, Usi Zade noted that on-chain derivatives trading often requires more capital and carries higher implicit costs compared to centralized platforms. According to him,

Perp DEXs Attract Traders, but Institutions Are Not Moving Yet 

Meanwhile, the MEXC COO mentioned that the industry has yet to see a broad migration from institutional clients to decentralized platforms. Instead, DEXs are increasingly positioning themselves as alternatives. 

More sophisticated traders, he elaborated, maintain on-chain exposure as a hedge against regulatory or counterparty risk. Despite this, centralized exchanges remain the traders’ go-to place for core liquidity, leverage, and execution.

In addition, Usi Zade suggested that most on-chain derivatives traders fall into a semi-professional category due to their grasp of technical terms. For mid-sized accounts, self-custody offers an added layer of comfort. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

However, these traders are generally not deploying institutional-grade strategies, making them a natural fit for decentralized platforms.

Beyond this semi-professional segment, traders tend to use perp DEXs selectively, targeting specific instruments for diversification or arbitrage. However, these platforms are rarely treated as primary execution venues, reinforcing the continued central role of centralized exchanges.

The Outlook for Perp DEXs and CEXs in 2026

Finally, in 2026, the executive expects that decentralized and centralized derivatives platforms will continue to coexist. Yet, each will serve distinct trader needs. 

Usi Zade shared that by the end of the year, this equilibrium is expected to reach the 15–20% range. He believes that this range signals sustainable growth for on-chain platforms without undermining the role of centralized exchanges as the primary venue for derivatives trading. 

He also forecasted that the market is likely to move toward greater hybridization, where there’s a better connection between transparency with improved user experience and the deep liquidity traditionally offered by centralized platforms.

Overall, perpetual DEXs are gaining relevance, but they are not replacing centralized exchanges. Instead, both models are evolving in parallel, with on-chain platforms expanding their roles alongside CEXs, suggesting a more hybrid derivatives space.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/perpetual-dex-vs-centralized-exchange-trading-future/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Woman shot 5 times by DHS to stare down Trump at State of the Union address

Woman shot 5 times by DHS to stare down Trump at State of the Union address

A House Democrat has invited Marimar Martinez to attend President Donald Trump's State of the Union address in Washington, D.C., after she was shot by Customs and
Share
Rawstory2026/02/06 03:36
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
WLFI Drops 20% Weekly as Price Tests the Crucial $0.113 Support

WLFI Drops 20% Weekly as Price Tests the Crucial $0.113 Support

On Thursday, February 5, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is continuing its decline and is trading at $0.1281, decreased by 5.89% in the past day. The token has lost
Share
Tronweekly2026/02/06 03:00