The post US Senate Crypto Market Bill Heads to January 27 Markup Without Democratic Support appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News After weeks of intense discussionsThe post US Senate Crypto Market Bill Heads to January 27 Markup Without Democratic Support appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News After weeks of intense discussions

US Senate Crypto Market Bill Heads to January 27 Markup Without Democratic Support

3 min read
US Senate Crypto Market Bill

The post US Senate Crypto Market Bill Heads to January 27 Markup Without Democratic Support appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

After weeks of intense discussions, the push to secure Democratic support for the U.S. Senate’s crypto market structure bill has hit a major setback. 

Despite this, a new draft of a crypto market structure bill has been released by the Senate Agriculture Committee, a step that could decide whether new crypto rules move forward or face more delays.

Crypto Bill Moves Forward Without Democratic Support

The Senate Agriculture Committee, led by Republican Senator John Boozman, has released a new draft of the crypto market structure bill after talks with Democrats failed to reach an agreement. As a result, the bill is moving ahead without bipartisan support.

However, this bill is focused on creating clear rules for how crypto assets should be handled in the United States. Now, the draft is scheduled for discussion at the January 27 markup meeting.

Committee Chairman Senator John Boozman said that while talks with Democrats did not succeed, the bill must still move ahead. He noted that long discussions have already helped improve the draft, and delaying it further would only increase confusion in the crypto market.

What the Crypto Market Bill Is Trying to Do

The main goal of the bill is to give the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) more power to oversee the crypto market. It also aims to clearly explain which digital assets fall under the CFTC and which are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Additionally, the bill also sets basic rules for crypto companies, such as exchanges and service providers, including how they should register and follow compliance standards. Supporters believe this will bring clarity and help the industry grow more safely.

  • Also Read :
  •   U.S. Treasury Buys Back $2.8 Billion in Debt Securities
  •   ,

Banking Committee Still Facing Delays

While the Agriculture Committee is moving ahead, the Senate Banking Committee is still stuck on its own crypto bill. Disagreements over stablecoins, especially around interest-like rewards, have slowed progress. 

There are reports that the Banking Committee may delay action until late March as it focuses on other political matters. Since most legislation in the Senate requires 60 votes, passing a party-line crypto bill will be significantly harder.

President Trump has also said he wants the bill passed quickly so he can sign it into law, calling it an important step toward opening new financial opportunities.

Even if the bill passes the committee vote, it still faces a long road. 

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

What is the U.S. Senate crypto market structure bill?

It’s a proposal to define how crypto assets are regulated in the U.S., clarifying roles between the CFTC and the SEC.

How could this bill affect everyday crypto users and investors?

Clearer oversight may reduce regulatory uncertainty for exchanges, which can improve market stability. However, stricter compliance could limit access to certain products or platforms.

Why is the Agriculture Committee involved in crypto regulation?

The committee oversees the CFTC, which regulates commodities markets. Lawmakers view many digital assets as commodities rather than securities, placing crypto under its scope.

What are the next realistic steps if the Banking Committee delays action?

Lawmakers may attempt to merge crypto provisions into other legislation or revisit negotiations later in the year. Industry pressure could influence future revisions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07