Could a Must-Pass Law Punish Crypto?

A brewing political fight over stablecoin yields threatens to derail long-awaited US crypto market structure reform.

Recent developments expose deep divisions among banks, crypto firms, and policymakers over who benefits most from the next phase of financial regulation.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Stablecoin Yield Showdown Stalls US Crypto Market Reform

At the center of the dispute is whether crypto platforms should be allowed to offer rewards or yield on stablecoins.

Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz warns that opposition from the banking lobby could sink the broader legislative effort altogether, even as existing law already permits certain forms of stablecoin yield.

According to Novogratz, banks are more concerned with competition than with consumer protection. Allowing crypto platforms to pay rewards on stablecoins could accelerate deposit outflows from traditional banks, pressuring margins and challenging legacy business models.

That concern appears to be playing out in Washington. The Senate Banking Committee has delayed progress on the broader CLARITY Act amid intense lobbying from the banking sector.

More than 3,200 bankers have urged lawmakers to close what they describe as a “payment of interest loophole.” They argue that stablecoin rewards could weaken community banks and reduce lending capacity.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Critics say the bill, as currently drafted, tilts the playing field. While banks retain the ability to pay interest on deposits, crypto platforms face tighter restrictions, with rewards allowed only for active participation, such as staking, liquidity provision, or governance.

The result, opponents argue, is regulation that protects incumbents at the expense of competition and consumer choice.

White House–Crypto Rift Deepens as Compromise Collides with Retail Concerns

The standoff has also revealed friction between the White House and the crypto industry. Journalist Brendan Pedersen recently noted that the “white house is still mad at Coinbase,” highlighting unresolved tensions as talks continue behind the scenes.

Sponsored

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has pushed back on claims of a breakdown, insisting discussions remain constructive and focused on compromise.

Nevertheless, views remain split inside the administration. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has warned against letting legislative perfection become the enemy of progress.

He argued that passing a bill now, under a pro-crypto administration, is preferable to risking harsher rules later.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Not everyone agrees. Crypto commentator Wendy O responded that while Witt’s logic may be politically sound, retail investors stand to lose.

Elsewhere, legal experts warn the stakes may be even higher than the current debate suggests. Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes cautioned that punitive crypto regulation does not require another financial crisis.

Beyond stablecoin yields, the CLARITY Act would establish clearer rules for major crypto assets, developer protections, and distinctions between DeFi and TradFi.

In the meantime, however, those reforms remain on hold, caught in a political showdown where banks, lawmakers, and crypto firms are all fighting to shape the future of US digital asset regulation.