Ethereum risks closing the month red as final trading hours approach Key analysts warn a negative close may mirror past bear cycles Heavy selling and low volum Ethereum risks closing the month red as final trading hours approach Key analysts warn a negative close may mirror past bear cycles Heavy selling and low volum

Ethereum Faces Historic Monthly Loss as Clock Ticks on Last 96-Hour Rebound

  • Ethereum risks closing the month red as final trading hours approach
  • Key analysts warn a negative close may mirror past bear cycles
  • Heavy selling and low volume tighten pressure on Ethereum’s short-term price

Ethereum is heading into the final stretch of the month under intense selling pressure as price weakness dominates market sentiment. With less than 96 hours remaining, the asset risks closing the month red and setting an unwanted historical record. However, Ethereum has already declined 13.92% over the past 365 days, reflecting one of its weakest yearly performances. Consequently, the focus has shifted to whether a late rebound can still alter this trajectory.


According to analyst Ted Pillows, a negative monthly close would confirm Ethereum underperformed across three quarters of the year. Besides that, such an outcome would mirror price behavior last seen during the 2018 bear market. Earlier in the year, Ethereum enjoyed renewed optimism after breaking above $4,000 in August. Moreover, traders widely expected continued upside momentum and a possible extension toward the $5,000 level.


That optimism faded as selling pressure intensified and price stability weakened. Hence, Ethereum failed to hold above $3,000 after mid-December, increasing short-term uncertainty. At the time of writing, Ethereum trades at $2,929.60, reflecting a 1.13% decline over the past 24 hours. Additionally, the asset moved within a narrow range between $2,894.95 and $2,983.69.


Trading activity also slowed notably during this period. Significantly, volume dropped 27.6% to $12.19 billion as market participants adopted a cautious stance. Despite the downturn, historical data presents a conflicting narrative for December. Over the last 10 years, Ethereum averaged gains above 5% during the month.


Notably, the strongest December performance occurred in 2017 when Ethereum surged by 70%. However, current conditions suggest history may not repeat itself this time. So far this year, Ethereum only exceeded its monthly average in May, July, and August. Those months delivered gains of 41.1%, 48.7%, and 18.7% respectively.


Also Read: XRP Price Prediction 2025–2029: Can XRP Break Above $2.00 Soon?


Selling Pressure Intensifies as Key Wallets Reactivate

Beyond price action, community developments have added pressure to Ethereum’s short-term outlook. According to on-chain data, a wallet suspected to belong to Erik Voorhees reactivated after nine years. That wallet subsequently sold $13.42 million worth of ETH, adding to existing market supply. Consequently, sentiment weakened further as traders reacted to the unexpected movement.


Similarly, JAN3 CEO Samson Mow confirmed the liquidation of all Bitmine Ethereum holdings. Moreover, Mow stated the company would now focus exclusively on Bitcoin. Such decisions often influence broader sentiment during periods of low liquidity. Hence, these moves reinforced bearish expectations heading into the month’s close.


Even so, sections of the community remain optimistic about the longer-term outlook. Many investors believe current weakness may set the stage for a recovery cycle in 2026. Ethereum’s immediate fate rests on its performance over the final trading sessions. Consequently, the next 96 hours may decide whether the asset avoids a historic monthly loss.


Also Read: XRP Exchange Supply Shrinks as ETF Demand Tightens Available Liquidity


The post Ethereum Faces Historic Monthly Loss as Clock Ticks on Last 96-Hour Rebound appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
RedStone Logo
RedStone Price(RED)
$0.2309
$0.2309$0.2309
+1.00%
USD
RedStone (RED) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Gold Surges Amid Venezuela Oil Blockade’s Crypto Impact

Gold Surges Amid Venezuela Oil Blockade’s Crypto Impact

Gold price hits $4,400 amid Venezuela blockade as crypto adapts.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/28 06:31
Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low

Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low

The post Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Worldwide Google search volume for the term
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/28 06:23