The days following Christmas have been a nightmare for DeBot, a popular AI-driven DeFi trading bot and wallet tool, which faced a security incident that saw communityThe days following Christmas have been a nightmare for DeBot, a popular AI-driven DeFi trading bot and wallet tool, which faced a security incident that saw community

DeBot plans refund after major hack

The days following Christmas have been a nightmare for DeBot, a popular AI-driven DeFi trading bot and wallet tool, which faced a security incident that saw community members report abnormal asset transfers from user wallets. 

The team behind the bot has since responded, promising refunds while assuring the core architecture was not affected. 

DeBot plans refund after major hack 

According to on-chain data, the hackers got away with about $255,000 in assets, consolidated to some addresses on BSC, with some funds funneled to Tornado Cash, where they were laundered. 

The founder of the SlowMist blockchain security outfit has claimed that the risk addresses are still vulnerable. He advised anyone with assets on them to move them.  

The DeBot team has also responded to the crisis with posts on X containing updates as well as plans for moving forward. According to one post, the DeBot secure wallet addresses are operating normally and were not affected in any way. 

The team acknowledged that there were relevant situations with some addresses, but that they are following up and handling them properly. For those worried about their assets, the team encouraged them to transfer said assets from their respective risk wallets to the secure wallet address. 

Additionally, the team has promised that all users who were affected by the hack will receive full compensation following a comprehensive review and tally. According to them, the hack only affected wallets imported or generated before December 10. 

They claim addresses that were generated or imported after December 10 are all secure wallets and unaffected, and they are working without a hitch. 

Trust Wallet suffered a similar issue 

Users of DeBot who were affected by the hack claimed that their assets were transferred out of their wallets. Those statements are reminiscent of the accounts given by victims of the Trust wallet hack, which saw the hacker get away with up to $7 million, as reported by Cryptopolitan. 

The theft of funds occurred shortly after the Binance-linked Trust Wallet released an updated version of its extension for the Chrome web browser. The breach was flagged on December 25 by on-chain detective ZachXBT and has since been confirmed by the wallet team.

“Community alert: A number of Trust Wallet users have reported that funds were drained from wallet addresses within the past couple hours,” ZachXBT posted on Telegram. “While the exact root cause has not been determined coincidentally the Trust Wallet Chrome extension pushed a new update yesterday.”

The breach targeted version 2.68 of Trust Wallet’s browser extension, according to what the wallet team posted on X. The team also urged users not to open that version and to upgrade to version 2.69. “Mobile-only users and all other browser extension versions are not impacted,” they claimed. 

Like DeBot, there is a promise to reimburse the stolen funds according to Changpeng Zhao, a co-founder of Binance.

Both exploits, which happened within close proximity to each other, targeted crypto wallets and have highlighted the importance of constant vigilance from all parties because the hackers are not taking any breaks. 

Crypto theft has already risen to $6.75 billion this year, according to a Chainalysis report. The number of personal wallet compromises has also surged to 158,000 from 64,000 last year, though the amount stolen accounted for 20% of the total, down from 44%.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.12265
$0.12265$0.12265
+2.10%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Gold Surges Amid Venezuela Oil Blockade’s Crypto Impact

Gold Surges Amid Venezuela Oil Blockade’s Crypto Impact

Gold price hits $4,400 amid Venezuela blockade as crypto adapts.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/28 06:31
Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low

Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low

The post Google Search Volume for ‘Crypto’ Hovers Slightly Above the 1-Year Low appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Worldwide Google search volume for the term
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/28 06:23