South Korea’s cryptocurrency market is witnessing heightened scrutiny over AI16Z, a token that has recently rebranded as ElizaOS (ELIZAOS) following a contract South Korea’s cryptocurrency market is witnessing heightened scrutiny over AI16Z, a token that has recently rebranded as ElizaOS (ELIZAOS) following a contract

AI16Z hit with DAXA trading alert, Bithumb and Coinone issue investment warning

South Korea’s cryptocurrency market is witnessing heightened scrutiny over AI16Z, a token that has recently rebranded as ElizaOS (ELIZAOS) following a contract migration.

The South Korean exchange regulator Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) has placed AI16Z under a trading alert on Bithumb’s platform, citing concerns over untimely disclosures and a lack of transparency that could materially affect the token’s value.

In parallel, Bithumb and Coinone have issued formal investment warnings to protect investors from potential financial losses.

Trading alert signals regulatory scrutiny

DAXA’s action comes as part of its ongoing oversight of digital assets in South Korea.

Officials have emphasised that the trading alert does not represent a judgment on AI16Z’s fundamentals but signals heightened regulatory monitoring.

Besides issuing a trading caution, Bithumb has also suspended AI16Z deposits in the meantime.

The regulator and the exchange are expected to announce a final decision on whether to extend, lift, or terminate trading support in the second week of January.

The measure underscores a growing expectation for transparency and timely communication from crypto projects.

Investors are being reminded that regulatory scrutiny can influence market confidence and token liquidity, even if trading continues.

In this context, understanding the project’s governance and operational updates becomes critical for anyone holding or considering buying the token.

Exchange warnings highlight AI16Z transparency concerns

Bithumb and Coinone’s formal investment warnings represent another layer of caution.

These exchanges specifically pointed to AI16Z’s failure to disclose key information promptly and a lack of clarity regarding major project changes.

While the token remains tradable, the warnings are intended to signal that AI16Z carries higher-than-normal risk.

Exchanges rarely issue such warnings, reserving them for situations where unresolved issues could significantly affect investors.

By flagging AI16Z, Bithumb, and Coinone aim to encourage due diligence and ensure that users have access to relevant information before making investment decisions.

The warnings empower investors to pause, research, and reassess their exposure, underscoring the importance of transparency in sustaining market confidence.

AI16Z’s market dynamics

At the time of the warnings, AI16Z was trading around $0.001735 with a market capitalization of $1.91 million and a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $133,000.

The price remains a fraction of its all-time high of $2.47, reflecting extreme drawdowns and high volatility over the past year.

Notably, the token recently underwent a major rebranding to ElizaOS (ELIZAOS) and migrated to a new contract, a process that has added complexity to investor oversight.

The combination of regulatory scrutiny, exchange warnings, and contract migration has created a precarious environment for the project and its native token.

While trading continues, market participants are encouraged to stay informed about developments from official sources, as the situation remains fluid and decisions by regulators or exchanges could materially impact liquidity and valuation.

The post AI16Z hit with DAXA trading alert, Bithumb and Coinone issue investment warning appeared first on Invezz

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.002394
$0.002394$0.002394
+1.31%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58