The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddled Apple with a €98.6 million fine for misusing its privacy policies to interfere with third-party developers. The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddled Apple with a €98.6 million fine for misusing its privacy policies to interfere with third-party developers. 

Apple has been fined €98.6 million in Italy for abusing its dominant position in the mobile app market

The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddled Apple with a €98.6 million fine for misusing its privacy policies to interfere with third-party developers. 

Italy’s competition authority has imposed a fine of €98.6 million on Apple for allegedly abusing its dominant market position through its App Store practices. Regulators claim Apple created unfair competition in the App Store by imposing stricter privacy rules on third-party developers than on itself. 

Has Apple been fined by Italian authorities? 

The Italian Competition Authority, known as AGCM, recently concluded an investigation into the unfair application of Apple’s privacy policies that began in May 2023. A fine of €98.6 million ($115 million) has been imposed on the company. 

Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature was introduced in iOS 14.5 back in April 2021 in order to ensure that apps get permission before tracking user activities across other companies’ apps and websites. When users download or update apps, they see a prompt asking if they want to allow tracking. 

Italian regulators found that Apple requires its developers to comply with ATT, while Apple itself does not. Additionally, Apple’s consent screen does not meet privacy legislation requirements, which forces developers to ask users for permission twice. 

The AGCM said that its investigation was highly complex and conducted in coordination with the European Commission and other international antitrust regulators. The regulator’s 199-page ruling requires Apple to immediately cease these practices and refrain from similar conduct that would violate Italian antitrust law in the future.

Will Apple appeal Italy’s decision?

Apple says it will appeal the decision, but it is not known how long that process may take. The company is likely not required to pay the fine until the appeal concludes. However, Apple has 90 days to report how it will comply with the AGCM’s requirements.

Apple has so far defended its strong privacy protections for users. According to the company, the ATT is a user privacy feature that gives people control over their data, not an anti-competitive tool. 

In July, the company appealed against a €500 million fine imposed by the European Union over alleged anti-competitive practices on its App Store. That case focused on Apple restricting app developers from informing customers about alternative offers outside the App Store.

In 2021, AGCM fined Apple and Google €10 million each for aggressive data practices that did not clearly explain how personal data would be used. The authority also previously imposed a €173.3 million fine on Apple and Amazon over alleged limits on selling Apple products on Amazon’s Italian marketplace.

In November, Apple confirmed that its Apple Ads and Apple Maps are in compliance with the Digital Markets Act, leading to a decision on which of the services would receive the gatekeeper label. This designation would impose strict pro-competition obligations and additional regulatory oversight.

French antitrust authorities earlier this year handed Apple a €150 million fine over its app tracking privacy feature, and a similar antitrust investigation into App Tracking Transparency is currently ongoing in Poland.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
Helium Mobile Logo
Helium Mobile Price(MOBILE)
$0.0002024
$0.0002024$0.0002024
+0.59%
USD
Helium Mobile (MOBILE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58