The Philippines Enhanced Resilience Act authorizes the allocation of $500 million annually in Foreing Military Financing to the Philippines from 2026 to 2030The Philippines Enhanced Resilience Act authorizes the allocation of $500 million annually in Foreing Military Financing to the Philippines from 2026 to 2030

US Congress OKs $2.5 billion in military aid for Philippines

2025/12/19 14:56

MANILA, Philippines – American lawmakers from both parties lauded the congressional passage of a piece of legislation that, once signed into law by United States President Donald Trump, would authorize up to $2.5 billion (P146.75 trillion) over five years in military aid for the Philippines. 

The Philippines Enhanced Resilience Act or PERA is part of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. 

The measure’s authors, Tennessee Senator Bill Hagerty and Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, said in a release on Wednesday, December 17 (Thursday, December 18, Manila time), that the bill would “deepen US-Philippines defense cooperation and strengthen the defense capabilities and interoperability of the US-Philippines Alliance to meet growing threats in the Indo-Pacific.” Hagerty is a Republican, while Kaine is a Democrat.

The amount is practically double the earlier “once-in-a-generation investment” of $500 million that the US allocated in foreign military financing (FMF) for the Philippines in 2024. That amount, announced during then-secretary of state Antony Blinken and defense secretary Lloyd Austin’s visit to Manila, covered 2024 up to 2025. 

The new pledge would authorize up to $500 annually in FMF for the Philippines for five years. 

The text of the bill itself, as filed in 2024, is much more explicit in its aspiration — to “support the acceleration of the modernization of the defense capabilities of the Philippines.” 

Modernization of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), according to the bill, would help: 

  • safeguard the territorial sovereignty of the Philippines;
  • improve maritime domain awareness;
  • counter coercive military activities;
  • improve the military and civilian infrastructure and capabilities necessary to prepare for regional contingencies; and
  • strengthen cooperation between the United States and the Philippines on counterterrorism-related efforts.

Based on the bill, it’s up to the US secretary of state, in coordination with the defense secretary, to submit before the US Congress a plan on how the FMF would be spent. 

It also requires the US secretary of state, the equivalent of the Philippines’ foreign affairs secretary, to submit before the US Congress an annual report that would expound on capabilities that the AFP needs, to include “coastal defense, long-range fires, integrated air defenses, maritime security, manned and unmanned aerial systems, mechanized ground mobility vehicles, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, defensive cybersecurity, and any other defense capabilities that the Secretary of State determines.” 

The earlier $500-million FMF pledge covered both the AFP and the Philippine Coast Guard. The new amount, once signed into law, only explicitly covers the AFP.

Bilateral ties between the Philippines and the US, Manila’s sole treaty-ally, have intensified over the past few years under Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. It was a 180-turn from ex-president Rodrigo Duterte’s adminsitration, which wanted closer ties with Beijing. 

The Marcos administration has been more aggressive in asserting Manila’s rights and entitlements in the South China Sea, a vast waterway much of which China claims. 

The South China Sea is where nearly a third of global trade passes. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.01196
$0.01196$0.01196
-1.64%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21