The post President Trump Allegedly Got Paid to Settle Crypto Cases: NYT Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The New York Times has accused President TrumpThe post President Trump Allegedly Got Paid to Settle Crypto Cases: NYT Report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The New York Times has accused President Trump

President Trump Allegedly Got Paid to Settle Crypto Cases: NYT Report

2025/12/15 14:58

The New York Times has accused President Trump and his family of having financially benefited from the settled crypto cases since the beginning of his administration. They linked some of them to political donations or business links.

NYT Report Links Trump to Crypto Case Reversals

An investigation by the New York Times found numerous crypto enforcement actions were either dropped or scaled back after the President started his second term. They said some cases involved companies that later formed financial or political connections with his family. 

The report says that several legal outcomes were linked to donations or business ties to the family’s growing crypto business. 

One example is the crypto company started by the Winklevoss twins. This company faced a federal lawsuit, and once the administration changed, regulators tried to freeze the case. Around the same time, the SEC wholly abandoned its case against Binance.

In another high-profile reversal, the SEC looked to cut a court-ordered penalty against Ripple Labs after years of litigation. 

The Times termed the pullback highly unusual. Traditionally, the SEC rarely beats a retreat in large clumps of lawsuits against the same sector. Still, investigators found the agency let up on more than 60% of crypto cases that were active when the President re-entered the White House.

Source: NYT

Dismissals stood out in crypto-related cases. These cases were dismissed at a higher rate compared to those in other industries under this administration. Meanwhile, the SEC kept filing enforcement actions unrelated to crypto during that time.

The report also mentioned that the SEC no longer actively pursues any crypto cases involving firms connected to Trump. Every such case was either paused or rolled back.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the conflict of interest allegations.

To note, the SEC did not voluntarily dismiss a single crypto case during the Biden administration that it had inherited from Trump’s first term.

Legal Outcomes Tied to Donations and Business Connections

The Times found that the second administration dismissed roughly a third of the inherited Biden-era crypto cases, as compared with about 4% involving other industries.

Of the 23 crypto cases it inherited, the SEC pulled back from 14. Eight of those involved defendants who formed political or financial ties to the president or his family.

Source: NYT

Examples include crypto founder Justin Sun, whose company Tron later became linked to digital assets tied to Trump. Lawyers for the President’s related businesses deny that there is any link between government decisions and private companies.

The Ripple case, for instance, moved just as fast. After the President’s comeback, the SEC tried to get the penalty reduced to $50 million. A judge had ordered the company to pay $125 million for securities violations. Then the judge refused to let them take it back on the grounds of the agency’s sudden reversal.

Source: https://coingape.com/president-trump-allegedly-got-paid-to-settle-crypto-cases-nyt-report/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00