The post Why Binance Seed Tag Token Sale Pricing Is Falling appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Throughout 2025, one of the most visible trends in the crypto marketThe post Why Binance Seed Tag Token Sale Pricing Is Falling appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Throughout 2025, one of the most visible trends in the crypto market

Why Binance Seed Tag Token Sale Pricing Is Falling

Throughout 2025, one of the most visible trends in the crypto market has been the rapid decline in performance of newly listed Binance tokens. This is especially true for those labeled with the Seed Tag, which marks early-stage, high-risk assets. 

Once viewed as a launchpad for the next generation of breakout projects, the Seed Tag segment has instead become one of the worst-performing categories on the exchange, leading people to question the quality of the tokens, investor trust, and how Binance picks its listings.

Using the combination of recent data, community research, and Binance’s own delisting waves, it seems that the Seed Tag tokens are collapsing because new projects are of lower quality, the way they get listed is broken, and what investors want has completely changed. 

That being said, we’ll go deeper into why this is happening by looking at the real numbers, examining specific failed tokens, and discussing what it means for traders moving forward.

Related: Binance Token Tags Updated: New Risk Labels for Traders

CZ himself acknowledges the problem

Before we even get to the newer data and the failing tokens, back in February, Binance’s founder, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, publicly acknowledged weaknesses in the listing process. He thought of it as somewhat broken, pointing out that the listing comes 4 hours after the announcement, during which the token prices go high on DEXes, and then people sell on CEX.

CZ’s comment shows the current structural flaws:

  • As soon as Binance announces a new token, traders on other platforms (DEXes) start buying it, pushing the price way up before it even hits Binance.
  • Seeing the Binance listing, traders on the main exchange often buy in, expecting a price surge, but actually end up buying at the inflated peak.
  • The traders who bought early on other platforms immediately sell on Binance for a quick profit, leaving regular investors who bought at a high price stuck as the value drops.

This pattern has been around for a while, but this year, weaker market conditions made it much worse, turning nearly every new listing into a predictable setup for a quick price crash.

Related: CZ Calls for Coinbase Parity on BNB Chain Listings as Views Split

April data confirms the trend

Fast forward a couple of months, an analyst in April put numbers to what many traders have been saying: new tokens listed on Binance are doing very poorly. 

The data showed that only 3 out of 27 tokens made money: $FORM, $RED, and $LAYER. This means that if you invested $100 into each listing, your $2,700 would now be worth about $1,500. Data also showed the average loss for all tokens was 44%, with most tokens dropping right after being listed and continuing to go down.

In the end, the analyst concluded that if you bought a token on Binance, you had zero chances of making money and were just providing exit liquidity for others to cash out.

This pattern of heavy losses continued as the months went on, which is a key reason why investors are now much more wary of risky Seed Tag tokens. Basically, when a category keeps losing money, trust disappears fast.

A warning label that became a red flag

Originally, the Seed Tag was introduced as a transparent way to warn users that a token is early-stage, high volatility, and may not have a proven track record. However, in 2025, it has come to signal something worse – a high probability of failure. 

A review of the top Seed Tag failures in 2025 shows that many tokens were delisted or collapsed by 80-90% shortly after launch.

TokenOutcomeFailure Type
VOXELDelisted (Dec 2025)Full delisting
AMBDelisted (Feb 2025)Full delisting
FISDelisted (Dec 2025)Full delisting
REIDelisted (Dec 2025)Full delisting
CLVDelisted (Feb 2025)Full delisting
STMXDelisted (Feb 2025)Full delisting
VITEDelisted (Feb 2025)Full delisting
BIO–90.9%Price collapse
COOKIE–82%Price collapse
BADGERDelisted (Apr 2025)Full delisting

There are likely several factors why these specific tokens delisted or had a huge price drop. For starters, most had very little daily buying and selling. Some had less than $1 million in volume, which is too low for a major exchange.

Binance regularly cites weak GitHub activity, poor communication from teams, and roadmaps that saw no updates as major downsides. Also, some projects raised red flags for having unreliable networks, poor security, or being at risk of hacks.

Broken tokenomics is another factor, considering that projects like BIO and COOKIE launched with token unlock schedules or supply structures that guaranteed sell pressure.

Then, there’s the general market shift. In 2025, investors became much pickier, prioritizing large caps and established L2 ecosystems, instead of early-stage experiments.

While graduations do happen (such as BONK, EIGEN, PENGU, PEPE, TON, and a few others), they are extremely rare compared to the number of failures, especially considering Binance tightened quality standards and many projects simply aren’t strong enough to survive these reviews.

Related: Binance Removes ‘Seed Tag’ Risk Warning From BONK, PEPE, and EigenLayer

Why Binance token sale prices are going down

All these issues lead back to the central issue of new Seed Tag tokens launching lower and performing so badly. The reasons are many, but here are the main ones:

  • Weak projects – many new tokens have no real users, unfinished products, or a clear plan, so demand diminishes and no one wants to buy them.
  • Too many tokens unlocking at once – large amounts of tokens get released for sale soon after listing, flooding the market and pushing the price down.
  • DEX pre-pumps distort true market value – speculative buying on other platforms before the Binance launch creates a price bubble that pops as soon as trading starts.
  • Poor liquidity and low volume – with few buyers and sellers, the price becomes unstable and easily falls.
  • Investor fatigue – after suffering repeated losses, retail traders now avoid early-stage listings, reducing natural buying pressure.
  • CEX competition – with dozens of new listings across multiple exchanges, capital is spread thin, which reduces demand for any single token.
  • General market preference for established coins – in 2025, most capital is going into big, established coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum, leaving new tokens with little to no attention.
  • Regulatory worries – tighter rules worldwide have made investors more cautious about risky, unproven tokens.

Simply put, Seed Tag tokens are falling because the system for launching them is broken, traders have lost faith, and the projects themselves often aren’t good enough to succeed.

It’s worth noting that on top of the Seed Tag, Binance also has a Monitoring Tag system, which flags tokens with elevated volatility, low liquidity, or compliance risks. Additionally, since July 2023, the exchange requires users to complete a risk awareness quiz every 90 days before they can trade tagged assets. The step is meant to make users more careful and help Binance meet stricter regulations.

These tags often have an immediate impact on price. Tokens like BLZ and CLV fell right after getting the warning label, showing how much traders trust Binance’s risk signals. On the other hand, when the Seed Tag was removed from tokens like BONK and PEPE in mid-2025, they saw more trading and interest.

Related: Binance Announces Monthly Monitoring Tag Reviews, Enhancing Transparency for Risky Tokens

What this means going into 2026

As things stand now, the Seed Tag is no longer just a caution label, but a genuine red flag. Crypto enthusiasts see these tokens as extremely volatile, prone to failure, and as quick trades with no long-term investments.

Only projects with sustained liquidity, active development, transparent communication, and real adoption have a fighting chance to survive Binance’s increasingly intense review cycles.

Looking ahead, traders can expect Seed Tag tokens to stay highly unpredictable, with more being removed from the exchange as Binance’s rules get even stricter.

Related: Binance Cuts Illegal Crypto Activity to Historic Lows, Data Shows

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/why-binance-seed-tag-token-sale-pricing-is-falling/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

The post South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea has witnessed a pivotal development in its cryptocurrency landscape with BDACS introducing the nation’s first won-backed stablecoin, KRW1, built on the Avalanche network. This stablecoin is anchored by won assets stored at Woori Bank in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring high security. Continue Reading:South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/south-korea-launches-innovative-stablecoin-initiative
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:54
Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40