The fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturingThe fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturing

Intel has tested chipmaking tools from firm with sanctioned China unit, sources say

2025/12/12 15:43

Chipmaker Intel has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter.

Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have supported the Chinese government’s efforts at harnessing commercial technology for military use and making advanced chips or chipmaking tools. ACM denies the allegations.

The two so-called wet etch tools, used for removing material from the silicon wafers that are transformed into semiconductors, were tested for possible use in Intel’s most advanced chipmaking process, known as 14A. That process is due for an initial launch in 2027.

Reuters could not determine if Intel had made a decision to add the tools to the advanced chipmaking process and has no evidence that the company violated any US regulations. ACM said it could not comment on “specific customer engagements,” but can confirm that “ACMR’s US team has sold and delivered multiple tools from our Asian operations to domestic customers.” It also said it has disclosed the shipment of three tools to a “major US-based semiconductor manufacturer,” which are being tested and some of which have met performance standards.

But the fact that Intel, which is now part-owned by the US government, would consider adding tools made by a firm with sanctioned units into its most advanced manufacturing line, raises important national security concerns, China hawks said. They flagged the possible transfer of Intel’s sensitive technological know-how to China, the eventual displacement of trusted Western tool suppliers with China-linked firms and even the potential for sabotage efforts by Beijing.

Faced with Beijing’s imposition of export controls on rare earth minerals, US President Donald Trump has backed off most hardline policies on chip exports to China and on Monday gave the green light for Nvidia to sell its second most advanced AI chips in China.

But as Chinese toolmakers begin to make incursions into the global marketplace, concern is growing among lawmakers of both parties, who earlier this month reintroduced legislation to bar chipmakers that have received billions in US government subsidies from using Chinese equipment as part of their government-backed expansion plans.

Intel’s testing of ACM tools “highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies and should not be permitted,” said Chris McGuire, a former White House National Security Council official under President Joe Biden and Senior Fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, in response to Reuters’ findings.

“Chinese tools could easily be remotely or physically manipulated by Beijing to degrade or even halt U.S. chip production. And US companies should play no part in helping China improve its chipmaking tools, which are the foundation of all advanced technology development,” he added.

ACM said it does not pose a national security threat, noting that its US operations are “bifurcated and isolated” from the sanctioned Shanghai-based unit, and that US customers are supported directly by U.S. personnel, with robust safeguards to protect customer trade secrets.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not address the specific concerns cited by China hawks but said “Normal trade and economic cooperation between companies should not be politicized. We urge certain individuals in the U.S. to abandon ideological biases and stop generalizing the concept of national security.”

ACM has longstanding China ties

ACM Research was founded in 1998 by David Wang, who still serves as CEO and owns over 57% of the company’s voting shares. ACM’s Chinese-language website lists Wang as an American citizen with Chinese permanent residence.

ACM also sells equipment to sanctioned Chinese chipmaker YMTC as well as China’s CXMT, which was named by the Defense Department as a Chinese military-backed company, according to a recent presentation on its website. SMIC, another ACM customer targeted by US sanctions over alleged ties to the Chinese military industrial complex, accounts for 14% of ACM’s sales, the company says.

While the company is headquartered in California, most of the company’s research and development take place in China, where ACM established its Shanghai-based R&D facility in 2006 according to a May 2025 investor presentation. “ACM now has complete R&D, engineering and manufacturing operations at its Zhangjiang High-Tech Park facility in Shanghai, China,” ACM’s website says.

Big hub in Oregon’s ‘silicon forest’

In November 2023, ACM announced the opening of a new facility in Hillsboro, Oregon- an area nicknamed the state’s Silicon Forest- “strategically located near key customers and partners” to serve as the company’s new sales and service hub.

The building is about a mile from Intel’s flagship R&D and early-stage manufacturing plant and there are no other cutting-edge chip factories in the state.

A January report by US-based hedge fund Kerrisdale Capital said the facility was aimed at supporting ACM’s relationship with Intel, noting that ACM qualified a new tool there in late 2023, and delivered additional tools in mid-2024.

ACM “has laid the foundation for expansion outside China through strategic engagements with global leaders such as Intel” which could bear fruit in 2026, Kerrisdale said in a follow-up report released last month. The toolmaker has “active tool evaluations across a range of cleaning process steps” at Intel and the firm is “upgrading its customer demonstration lab and local R&D capabilities there to enable Intel to run wafers locally on ACMR tools,” it added.

Intel did not respond to a request for comment on the report. ACM said it is not a significant supplier of equipment to any major U.S. chipmaker.

China’s push for global market share

ACM is still a small player on the global stage, ranking 24th in the global semiconductor equipment market with an 8% share of the segment for cleaning tools, according to Gartner Research.

But Beijing has been striving since at least 2015 to build a competitive domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry, long before Washington began restricting Chinese access to U.S. tools, the House Select Committee on China said in an October report, citing gains in global market share for Chinese toolmakers.

The committee “has even reviewed with concern reports that ACM Research…has sold (semiconductor manufacturing equipment) to a semiconductor manufacturer with US operations that also formally certified ACM Research’s tools for use in its production line,” the report adds, without further detail.

Ti ools from ACM and Chinese counterparts are 20% to 30% cheaper than those made by rivals like Applied Materials and Lam, according to Dan Hutcheson, Vice Chair of TechInsights Inc, creating a downward price pressure on more established competitors. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Factor Logo
Factor Price(FACT)
$1.19
$1.19$1.19
-0.83%
USD
Factor (FACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto casino Luck.io is reportedly paying influencers six figures a month to promote its services, a June 18 X post from popular crypto trader Jordan Fish, aka Cobie, shows. Crypto Influencers Reportedly Earning Six Figures Monthly According to a screenshot of messages between Cobie and an unidentified source embedded in the Wednesday post, the anonymous messenger confirmed that the crypto company pays influencers “around” $500,000 per month to promote the casino. They’re paying extremely well (6 fig per month) pic.twitter.com/AKRVKU9vp4 — Cobie (@cobie) June 18, 2025 However, not everyone was as convinced of the number’s accuracy. “That’s only for Faze Banks probably,” one user replied. “Other influencers are getting $20-40k per month. So, same as other online crypto casinos.” Cobie pushed back on the user’s claims by identifying the messenger as “a crypto person,” going on to state that he knew of “4 other crypto people” earning “above 200k” from Luck.io. Drake’s Massive Stake.com Deal Cobie’s post comes amid growing speculation over celebrity and influencer collaborations with crypto casinos globally. Aubrey Graham, better known as Toronto-based rapper Drake, is reported to make nearly $100 million every year from his partnership with cryptocurrency casino Stake.com. As part of his deal with the Curaçao-based digital casino, the “Nokia” rapper occasionally hosts live-stream gambling sessions for his more than 140 million Instagram followers. Founded by entrepreneurs Ed Craven and Bijan Therani in 2017, the organization allegedly raked in $2.6 billion in 2022. Stake.com has even solidified key partnerships with Alfa Romeo’s F1 team and Liverpool-based Everton Football Club. However, concerns remain over crypto casinos’ legality as a whole , given their massive accessibility and reach online. Earlier this year, Stake was slapped with litigation out of Illinois for supposedly running an illegal online casino stateside while causing “severe harm to vulnerable populations.” “Stake floods social media platforms with slick ads, influencer videos, and flashy visuals, making its games seem safe, fun, and harmless,” the lawsuit claims. “By masking its real-money gambling platform as just another “social casino,” Stake creates exactly the kind of dangerous environment that Illinois gambling laws were designed to stop.”
Share
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:53
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55