Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>

Brazil’s Central Bank Greenlights Full Crypto Framework: Here’s the 2026 VASP Launch Date

2025/11/11 10:00
  • Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
  • New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection.

The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on June 2, 2026, detail the conditions for operating in the sector and assign a specific classification to stablecoins, integrating their use into the framework for international exchange.

Resolutions BCB nº 519, 520, and 521 form the foundation of the new supervisory scheme. Resolution nº 519 defines the figure of the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) and establishes operational requirements.

These institutions, whether traditional financial entities or companies created exclusively for this purpose, must comply with rules for governance, internal control, and procedures against money laundering and terrorist financing. Their operation as intermediaries, custodians, or brokers requires a guarantee of transparency and client protection.

The authorization process for these providers is detailed in Resolution nº 520. This norm updates the criteria applicable to financial segments and sets deadlines for existing companies in the sector to adapt to the Central Bank’s requirements.

The Direct Impact on Stablecoins and International Transactions

Resolution nº 521 creates a substantial change by classifying operations with virtual assets as part of the foreign exchange and international capital markets. Activities such as international payments, transfers to self-custodied wallets, and conversions between fiat currencies and crypto assets fall under this category. In practice, transactions with stablecoins like USDT, USDC, BRZ, and BRLV are equated to traditional foreign exchange operations.

This measure means that international payments or remittances made with stablecoins are subject to the same limits and identification requirements. The rule sets an operational cap of 100,000 dollars per transaction when the counterparty is not a registered financial institution. Companies must implement processes to verify the origin and destination of funds, in addition to reporting data to the Central Bank.

A BCB executive, Gilneu, specified that stablecoins with algorithmic collateral control will not be accepted, citing previous cases where these assets did not prove functional.

The Consolidation of the Legal Framework and its Effects on the Market

The publication of these resolutions represents the final stage of a process that began with Law nº 14,478/2022 and continued with Decree nº 11,563/2023, which designated the Central Bank as the sector’s authority. The public consultations numbered 97/2023, 109/2024, 110/2024, and 111/2024 have now resulted in regulation with concrete deadlines and obligations.

]]>
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00