The post Three EXO Members Are Noticeably Missing From Their Upcoming Album appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. EXO is shown here with its original nine-member lineup: L-R Baekhyun, Chen, Lay, Sehun, Chanyeol, D.O., Kai, Suho and Xiumin. Rolling Stone India via Ni9ht Night/X In case you missed it, KPop veterans EXO just announced their eighth album, coming early 2026. Early reactions to the news have been mixed across social media. On the one hand, fans are ecstatic across the board for the returning members Suho, Chanyeol, D.O., Sehun, Kai, and Lay — especially since this is Lay’s first full-length collaboration with the group since 2021. On the other hand, there has also been outcry that three members — one-third of their existing lineup — have noticeably gone unmentioned: Chen, Baekhyun and Xiumin. EXO’s Shrinking Roster EXO originally debuted in 2012 as a 12-member group split into two subunits — EXO-K and EXO-M — promoting simultaneously in South Korea and China. The full original lineup comprised Xiumin, Luhan, Kris, Suho, Lay, Baekhyun, Chen, Chanyeol, D.O., Tao, Kai, and Sehun. However, the group has faced multiple departures over the years, as is common with longstanding groups in the KPop industry. In 2014 and 2015, three of EXO’s Chinese members — Kris, Luhan, and Tao — left the group after filing lawsuits against their label SM Entertainment. Of these, Luhan and Tao remained active in their solo careers, and Kris is currently in prison on charges including tax evasion and rape. While the remaining nine members continued as EXO, the group’s unity would face yet another challenge nearly a decade later. EXO-CBX Controversy As mentioned above, members Chen, Baekhyun, and Xiumin — collectively known as subunit EXO-CBX — have been noticeably absent from announcements about the December fanmeeting and the 2026 album. The conflict dates back to June 2023, when the trio raised concerns over contract terms and payment transparency,… The post Three EXO Members Are Noticeably Missing From Their Upcoming Album appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. EXO is shown here with its original nine-member lineup: L-R Baekhyun, Chen, Lay, Sehun, Chanyeol, D.O., Kai, Suho and Xiumin. Rolling Stone India via Ni9ht Night/X In case you missed it, KPop veterans EXO just announced their eighth album, coming early 2026. Early reactions to the news have been mixed across social media. On the one hand, fans are ecstatic across the board for the returning members Suho, Chanyeol, D.O., Sehun, Kai, and Lay — especially since this is Lay’s first full-length collaboration with the group since 2021. On the other hand, there has also been outcry that three members — one-third of their existing lineup — have noticeably gone unmentioned: Chen, Baekhyun and Xiumin. EXO’s Shrinking Roster EXO originally debuted in 2012 as a 12-member group split into two subunits — EXO-K and EXO-M — promoting simultaneously in South Korea and China. The full original lineup comprised Xiumin, Luhan, Kris, Suho, Lay, Baekhyun, Chen, Chanyeol, D.O., Tao, Kai, and Sehun. However, the group has faced multiple departures over the years, as is common with longstanding groups in the KPop industry. In 2014 and 2015, three of EXO’s Chinese members — Kris, Luhan, and Tao — left the group after filing lawsuits against their label SM Entertainment. Of these, Luhan and Tao remained active in their solo careers, and Kris is currently in prison on charges including tax evasion and rape. While the remaining nine members continued as EXO, the group’s unity would face yet another challenge nearly a decade later. EXO-CBX Controversy As mentioned above, members Chen, Baekhyun, and Xiumin — collectively known as subunit EXO-CBX — have been noticeably absent from announcements about the December fanmeeting and the 2026 album. The conflict dates back to June 2023, when the trio raised concerns over contract terms and payment transparency,…

Three EXO Members Are Noticeably Missing From Their Upcoming Album

2025/10/27 18:29

EXO is shown here with its original nine-member lineup: L-R Baekhyun, Chen, Lay, Sehun, Chanyeol, D.O., Kai, Suho and Xiumin.

Rolling Stone India via Ni9ht Night/X

In case you missed it, KPop veterans EXO just announced their eighth album, coming early 2026.

Early reactions to the news have been mixed across social media.

On the one hand, fans are ecstatic across the board for the returning members Suho, Chanyeol, D.O., Sehun, Kai, and Lay — especially since this is Lay’s first full-length collaboration with the group since 2021.

On the other hand, there has also been outcry that three members — one-third of their existing lineup — have noticeably gone unmentioned: Chen, Baekhyun and Xiumin.

EXO’s Shrinking Roster

EXO originally debuted in 2012 as a 12-member group split into two subunits — EXO-K and EXO-M — promoting simultaneously in South Korea and China. The full original lineup comprised Xiumin, Luhan, Kris, Suho, Lay, Baekhyun, Chen, Chanyeol, D.O., Tao, Kai, and Sehun.

However, the group has faced multiple departures over the years, as is common with longstanding groups in the KPop industry. In 2014 and 2015, three of EXO’s Chinese members — Kris, Luhan, and Tao — left the group after filing lawsuits against their label SM Entertainment.

Of these, Luhan and Tao remained active in their solo careers, and Kris is currently in prison on charges including tax evasion and rape.

While the remaining nine members continued as EXO, the group’s unity would face yet another challenge nearly a decade later.

EXO-CBX Controversy

As mentioned above, members Chen, Baekhyun, and Xiumin — collectively known as subunit EXO-CBX — have been noticeably absent from announcements about the December fanmeeting and the 2026 album.

The conflict dates back to June 2023, when the trio raised concerns over contract terms and payment transparency, according to multiple Korean entertainment outlets. That same month, EXO-CBX sent a formal notice to SM Entertainment expressing their intention to terminate their exclusive contracts, citing alleged discrepancies in settlement data.

The two sides initially agreed to maintain the exclusive contract for group activities with EXO, while EXO-CBX decided to pursue individual activities under their new agency, INB100. However, tensions flared again in 2024.

Per Bandwagon Asia, CBX maintained that the company failed to provide proper accounting records and did not honor its promise of a 5.5 percent distribution fee on album and music sales. SM Entertainment maintained, as quoted by the same outlet, that “exclusive contracts must be upheld,” and stated that CBX had agreed to remit 10 percent of their individual activity revenue.

As of September 2025, Soompi reported that court-led mediation efforts had not resulted in a resolution, with approximately 600 million won (about $430,000 USD) in dispute.

During EXO’s 13th anniversary celebration in 2025, the broadcast went on without CBX, leaving fans with what some described as a “half-hearted full-group” anniversary.

What’s Next for EXO?

EXO plans to perform their winter classic “The First Snow” and unveil new tracks from their upcoming album during their December fan meeting ‘EXOverse’.

The event will proceed with the six participating members, while the legal dispute between CBX and SM Entertainment remains ongoing with no resolution timeline announced.

Whether the group will reunite as nine members for future activities depends on the outcome of the lawsuit and any potential reconciliation between the parties involved. For now, it appears EXO will continue promotional activities with their current six-member lineup through 2026.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahabraham/2025/10/27/why-are-some-exo-members-missing-from-their-upcoming-album/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00