The post Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra. Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.” The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.” The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4.  Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack.  Regarding yesterday’s Abracadabra (@MIM_Spell) hack event. Below are some fun facts I observed: *Disclaimer: I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts. (1) The only fork with TVL and was vulnerable to this attack vector (afaik), @synnax_labs,… pic.twitter.com/6L60tGDN3v — Weilin (William) Li (@hklst4r) October 5, 2025 Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?” Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.”  Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit.  Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack… The post Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra. Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.” The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.” The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4.  Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack.  Regarding yesterday’s Abracadabra (@MIM_Spell) hack event. Below are some fun facts I observed: *Disclaimer: I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts. (1) The only fork with TVL and was vulnerable to this attack vector (afaik), @synnax_labs,… pic.twitter.com/6L60tGDN3v — Weilin (William) Li (@hklst4r) October 5, 2025 Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?” Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.”  Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit.  Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack…

Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit

PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra.

Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.”

The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.”

The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4. 

Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack. 

Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected

They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?”

Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.” 

Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit. 

Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks

Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack after a flaw in the protocol’s cook function was exploited to manipulate its solvency checks.

The funds were subsequently sent to Tornado Cash before Abracadabra bought back MIM and fully recovered. PeckShield didn’t flag the Abracadabra exploit on its alert account.

Abracadabra has suffered three major DeFi exploits since 2024, losing over $21 million.

In January 2024, it lost $6.5 million after a hacker appeared to have exploited a rounding error in its CauldronV4 smart contract code.

Then, over a year later, it was hacked for $13 million worth of ether after following an exploit with the contract’s collateral accounting mechanism.

Protos has reached out to Synnax Labs and PeckShield Inc. for comment and will update this piece should we hear back. 

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/inside-the-fallout-from-peckshields-synnax-labs-audit/

Market Opportunity
WorldAssets Logo
WorldAssets Price(INC)
$0.6504
$0.6504$0.6504
-0.38%
USD
WorldAssets (INC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto execs met with US lawmakers to discuss Bitcoin reserve, market structure bills

Crypto execs met with US lawmakers to discuss Bitcoin reserve, market structure bills

                                                                               Lawmakers in the US House of Representatives and Senate met with cryptocurrency industry leaders in three separate roundtable events this week.                     Members of the US Congress met with key figures in the cryptocurrency industry to discuss issues and potential laws related to the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve and a market structure.On Tuesday, a group of lawmakers that included Alaska Representative Nick Begich and Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno met with Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor and others in a roundtable event regarding the BITCOIN Act, a bill to establish a strategic Bitcoin (BTC) reserve. The discussion was hosted by the advocacy organization Digital Chamber and its affiliates, the Digital Power Network and Bitcoin Treasury Council.“Legislators and the executives at yesterday’s roundtable agree, there is a need [for] a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve law to ensure its longevity for America’s financial future,” Hailey Miller, director of government affairs and public policy at Digital Power Network, told Cointelegraph. “Most attendees are looking for next steps, which may mean including the SBR within the broader policy frameworks already advancing.“Read more
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 03:30
Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058

Ethereum price predictions are turning heads, with analysts suggesting ETH could climb to $10,000 by 2026 as institutional demand and network upgrades drive growth. While Ethereum remains a blue-chip asset, investors looking for sharper multiples are eyeing Layer Brett (LBRETT). Currently in presale at just $0.0058, the Ethereum Layer 2 meme coin is drawing huge [...] The post Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Targets $10,000 In 2026 But Layer Brett Could Reach $1 From $0.0058 appeared first on Blockonomi.
Share
Blockonomi2025/09/17 23:45
Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High

Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High

The post Texas Monet Bank Plans Crypto Services as Bitcoin Hits $126K High appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Monet Bank, a Texas-based institution owned by billionaire Andy Beal, has rebranded to prioritize cryptocurrency services, offering secure digital asset banking solutions amid regulatory shifts. This move positions it as a premier provider for crypto custody, lending, and blockchain-integrated transactions, capitalizing on Bitcoin’s 2025 all-time high of $126,000. Rebranding Focus: Monet Bank’s transition from Beal Savings Bank to XD Bank and now Monet Bank emphasizes digital asset innovation for the modern economy. Regulatory Changes: Recent federal adjustments under the Trump administration have eased restrictions, enabling banks like Monet to engage with cryptocurrencies without prior cautions. Growth in Sector: With Bitcoin hitting $126,000 in 2025, institutions such as Monet are expanding services, including blockchain for faster payments, supported by FDIC regulation and over $1 billion in capital. Discover how Monet Bank’s pivot to cryptocurrency services is reshaping banking. Explore secure digital asset solutions and regulatory insights for crypto investors today. (148 characters) What is Monet Bank’s Strategy for Cryptocurrency Services? Monet Bank’s cryptocurrency services represent a strategic pivot to integrate digital assets into traditional banking, providing clients with custody, lending, and blockchain-based transactions. Founded in 1988 as Beal Savings Bank, the Texas institution has undergone two rebrands in 2025—first to XD Bank and now to Monet Bank—to align with the digital economy. This evolution allows FDIC-insured operations while offering innovative tools for cryptocurrency users, backed by less than $6 billion in assets and strong capital reserves. How Does Monet Bank’s Rebranding Impact Crypto Banking? Monet Bank’s rebranding to focus on cryptocurrency services stems from a clear vision to become a leading digital asset financial institution. According to the bank’s official statement, it aims to deliver “innovative and forward-facing solutions for the digital economy,” operating through six Texas offices under strict FDIC oversight. This small community bank, with assets under $6 billion…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 09:52