UXLINK has announced a community governance vote via Snapshot that is expected to go live on October 4, 2025. It will be open to Ethereum mainnet $UXLINK holders. The vote is part of the platform’s attempt to do damage control as it struggles to right itself after an exploit caused millions more tokens to be […]UXLINK has announced a community governance vote via Snapshot that is expected to go live on October 4, 2025. It will be open to Ethereum mainnet $UXLINK holders. The vote is part of the platform’s attempt to do damage control as it struggles to right itself after an exploit caused millions more tokens to be […]

UXLINK to hold community vote after $11M exploit

2025/10/03 22:51
3 min read

UXLINK has announced a community governance vote via Snapshot that is expected to go live on October 4, 2025. It will be open to Ethereum mainnet $UXLINK holders. The vote is part of the platform’s attempt to do damage control as it struggles to right itself after an exploit caused millions more tokens to be minted and sold. 

UXLINK revealed plans to take the snapshot vote on X earlier today, October 3. According to the post, community members will decide between having an early unlocking of a portion of tokens for those affected by the hack using all recovered funds (from exchanges), litigable team’s and treasure’s proportion for compensation. 

If the majority goes with the first option, the team wrote that it would be covered in the swap & compensation plans with CEXs and on-chain users.

“We will try our best to resume new UXLINK trading on most exchanges and encourage our existing holders to vote. We’re committed to fairness and transparency throughout the swap and compensation process.”

Members are split over the vote 

The vote is an effort from the platform to shore up the damage caused by an exploit that happened last month. However, community sentiment is split. 

Analysts have warned that if the early unlock is successful, 5–10% of the supply may enter circulation earlier than anticipated, which raises concerns about dilution, even though it will also allow for quicker compensation and possible relistings on exchanges. 

That could stabilize sentiment and encourage recovery similar to other post-hack rebounds. However, there is a potential for further decline if the proposal is rejected or relistings are pushed back. 

Analysts say true recovery will ultimately depend on whether governance offers a credible route to restoring liquidity and exchange access.

The UXLINK exploit was a major security breach that was reported on September 22, 2025, when hackers targeted a vulnerability in its multi-signature wallet, which allowed them to mint billions of $UXLINK tokens unauthorized. 

This pushed the token supply from 1 billion to over 10 trillion, followed by rapid sales on centralized (CEX) and decentralized (DEX) exchanges. 

The hacker ultimately got away with $11.3 million in ETH, WBTC, and stablecoins, which were rerouted through Ethereum and Arbitrum. The project’s token price took a hit as trading volume spiked and liquidations followed, falling by more than 70% after the breach, wiping out nearly $70 million in market value. 

However, that is not the best part. In an ironic twist, the hacker also found himself a victim of a phishing attack not long after, which ultimately cost them $48 million worth of the stolen $UXLINK.

Yu Xian, founder of SlowMist, has hinted at the possible group behind the exploit. According to a post shared by Yu on X, he said that “the approximately 542 million UXLINK tokens stolen earlier may have been phished away by the Inferno Drainer using ordinary authorization phishing methods.”

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.001387
$0.001387$0.001387
+1.98%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16