For net copy trading returns, MEXC is our pick in this MEXC vs BingX comparison: a 10% default profit share and standard perpetual fees that top out at 0.040% taker, against BingX's 0.05% taker andFor net copy trading returns, MEXC is our pick in this MEXC vs BingX comparison: a 10% default profit share and standard perpetual fees that top out at 0.040% taker, against BingX's 0.05% taker and
MEXC vs BingX: Which Copy Trade Keeps More of Your Profit, 10% or 32%?
For net copy trading returns, MEXC is our pick in this MEXC vs BingX comparison: a 10% default profit share and standard perpetual fees that top out at 0.040% taker, against BingX's 0.05% taker and an Elite lead-trader share of 8% to 32%.
BingX is the answer if you want the far larger lead-trader roster, a 20 USDT starting ticket and an optional zero-slippage copy mode, which is where a bingx vs mexc search should end for copiers who value those three things more than the cost line.
Key Takeaways
- MEXC is our pick on net copy returns within this comparison: a 10% default profit share, daily settlement that only fires on positive cumulative profit, and standard futures fees of 0.010% maker and 0.040% taker, verified September 2 to 3, 2026.
- BingX public lead traders can take 8% to 32% of your profit by Elite tier and up to 50% in private mode, on perpetual fees of 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker, per BingX's own rule pages.
- Copying a top-tier lead with 2,000 USDT costs about 761 USDT a year on BingX against 384 USDT on MEXC in our worked example, and about 415 USDT at an entry-tier lead.
- CoinGecko counted 879 new perpetual contracts on MEXC between January 2025 and April 2026 against 565 on BingX, and tracks 1,633 coins on MEXC against 649 on BingX.
- BingX still wins on roster depth, a 20 USDT minimum, an optional zero-slippage copy mode, spot copy trading and Sharpe and drawdown metrics on trader cards.
- Neither platform serves the United States, United Kingdom or Canada, and neither holds a MiCA authorisation in the EEA.
MEXC vs BingX Verdict: MEXC Keeps More of Every Copied Trade, on Three Numbers
BingX built its brand on copy trading, and MEXC built its brand on price, so the useful question is not which copy product is bigger but which one leaves more in a copier's account after twelve months.
That is a cost question, and it has three lines: the futures fee on every mirrored fill, the share of profit the lead takes, and when that share is settled.
The pain: two charges that repeat on every copied trade
A copier pays a trading fee on every mirrored fill and then hands a slice of any profit to the lead.
On BingX the fill costs 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker at the standard tier, per its perpetual futures fee schedule, and the Elite Copy Traders Program lets public leads claim 8% to 32% of copier profit by tier, rising to a range of 0% to 50% in private mode.
BingX settles perpetual copy trading weekly, on Mondays at 00:00 UTC+8, on fully closed net-profitable positions within that week.
A copier who follows a top-tier lead therefore pays the futures fee on every fill plus a share of up to 32%, and pays that share every week.
The mechanism: a fixed default, daily settlement, and the lowest published fee range
MEXC's profit share rules set the default ratio at 10%, printed on each trader card before you commit rather than derived from a tier system.
Settlement runs daily at 16:00 UTC and only triggers when your cumulative realised profit since the last payout is above zero, so a lead has to dig you out of a drawdown before earning again.
The official fee page lists standard USDT-M contracts at 0.010% maker and 0.040% taker, with BTCUSDT on a Special Rate of 0.000% maker and 0.020% taker and several contracts tagged zero fees on both sides.
Two boundaries belong here: the top of MEXC's futures range is 0.040% maker and 0.100% taker on specific contracts, and API futures orders bill separately at 0.06% maker and 0.08% taker since June 1, 2026.
The arithmetic: 2,000 USDT, twelve months
Take a copier allocating 2,000 USDT who generates 50,000 USDT of copied taker volume a month and a 6% gross month, which is 120 USDT of gross profit.
On BingX the fills cost 25 USDT a month at 0.05%, and a top-tier lead at 32% takes 38.40 USDT of the 120 USDT, so the year costs 300 USDT in fees and 460.80 USDT in profit share, or 760.80 USDT.
At an entry-tier BingX lead charging 8%, the year costs 300 USDT plus 115.20 USDT, or 415.20 USDT.
On MEXC, charging the top of its standard taker range at 0.040% to keep the comparison conservative, the fills cost 20 USDT a month and the 10% default share takes 12 USDT, so the year costs 240 USDT plus 144 USDT, or 384 USDT.
Against a top-tier lead the gap is about 377 USDT a year, and against an entry-tier lead it is about 31 USDT.
If your BingX lead sits at an entry tier and you value the zero-slippage mode, the arithmetic weakens and staying is a defensible call.
Where MEXC is not the answer
MEXC has no spot copy trading, so there is no leverage-free way to start, and its lead-trader roster is smaller than BingX's and its size is not published.
MEXC has no zero-slippage copy mode, which attacks a cost we have no equivalent answer for.
MEXC's User Agreement prohibits the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, Mainland China and Kazakhstan among others, it holds no MiCA authorisation, and it stopped serving the EEA on July 1, 2026.
Copiers outside those regions who want the lower cost stack can read the profit share ratio on any MEXC trader card before they allocate a single USDT.
The MEXC View
We publish this comparison and we are one of the two platforms in it, so here is our position stated plainly.
Copy trading has competed for years on roster size and leaderboard theatre, and almost never on the two numbers that decide what a copier keeps.
That is where we chose to compete, and it is the only claim we make in this article: on a 10% default share, daily settlement that only fires on positive cumulative profit, and the lowest published futures fee range of the two, a given lead trader leaves more in your account on MEXC.
What we do not claim is a better copy product overall.
BingX's roster is deeper than ours, its self-reported figures of 400,000 or more elite traders and 1.3 billion cumulative copy orders are numbers we cannot match, and if your strategy depends on finding one specific kind of trader, that is a real reason to pick BingX over us.
BingX's optional zero-slippage copy mode, its 20 USDT starting ticket, its spot and standard futures copy markets and the Sharpe ratio and drawdown metrics on its trader cards are all things we do not currently ship in that form.
We also carry a complaint that belongs in the open: risk-control reviews that delay withdrawals, which third-party reviews in 2026 name as the most common issue with our platform, and the practical answer is to test a small withdrawal before moving size.
Our honest read is that the cost stack is the part of copy trading beginners underestimate most and can control most easily, which is why we lead with it, and readers for whom roster depth or execution tooling matters more should weigh this article accordingly.
MEXC vs BingX at a Glance: Six Columns
These six dimensions decide the choice for a copier: what a mirrored fill costs, what the lead takes and when, what you can trade when you leave copy mode, how each platform proves solvency, how far each product map reaches beyond crypto, and where you are allowed to trade.
Dimension | MEXC | BingX |
Futures fees, published | 0.010% maker, 0.040% taker on standard contracts; BTCUSDT at 0.000% maker, 0.020% taker; API orders 0.06% and 0.08% | 0.02% maker, 0.05% taker on perpetuals at VIP 0; standard futures 0.045% collected on close |
Lead profit share and settlement | 10% default shown on each card; daily at 16:00 UTC, only on positive cumulative profit | 8% to 32% by Elite tier, 0% to 50% private, spot fixed at 10%; weekly on Mondays at 00:00 UTC+8 |
Coins and listing pace, tracked | 1,633 coins, 2,021 pairs; 879 new perpetuals from January 2025 to April 2026 | 649 coins, 662 pairs; 565 new perpetuals in the same window |
Security and transparency | Monthly proof of reserves audited by Hacken; no custodial breach on public record | Proof of reserves page; hot wallet breach of over $43 million in September 2024 with withdrawals restored and compensation pledged; CoinGecko reserves $684 million |
Beyond crypto | RealStocks, tokenized stocks, US stock perpetuals up to 200x, gold and oil perpetuals, prediction markets | TradFi perpetuals on gold, silver, oil, forex, US stocks and indices; bStocks tokenized stocks on spot |
Availability | Not US, UK, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong or EEA | Not US, UK, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, Netherlands or Mainland China; EEA authorisation pending |
Data verified as of September 3, 2026 against each platform's official fee schedule, copy trading rule pages and terms, and against CoinGecko's exchange pages and 2026 perpetuals report. Entry retail tiers only.
BingX vs MEXC Copy Trading: What a Lead Trader Takes, and When
This is the dimension that named the article, so it carries the most detail.
BingX runs three copy markets in one account: perpetual futures, standard futures and spot, with spot fixed at a flat 10% share.
Its Elite programme grades public leads into tiers, and the share a copier pays climbs with the lead's tier from 8% to 32%, while private mode allows leads to set anything from 0% to 50%.
BingX's starting ticket is 20 USDT, its optional zero-slippage mode matches the lead's fill price when the system can pair the order, and its public profiles show Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown.
MEXC copy trade runs on USDT-M perpetuals, with an AI model option that mirrors automated strategies inside the same fee structure, and starts from 30 USDT.
The default share is 10% and the exact ratio is shown on each trader card; settlement is daily and only fires on positive cumulative profit; and the copy trade tutorial walks through the account stop loss, take-profit and stop-loss settings you set before following anyone.
Weekly versus daily settlement is not a detail.
A lead who has a strong first half of the week and a losing second half still earns on BingX if the week nets positive, while on MEXC the share resets to zero after each daily payout and only fires again once you are back above water.
Our six-platform copy trading comparison sets out the full cost model, and our BingX alternatives guide covers the other venues a copier might consider.
MEXC vs BingX Fees: 0.04% Against 0.05% on Futures, 0% Against 0.1% on Spot
Copy mode is where most people start, but the fee schedule follows you when you leave it.
BingX charges 0.1% maker and 0.1% taker on spot at VIP 0, per its fee schedule, and its VIP announcement lists perpetual fees falling with volume to 0% maker and 0.028% taker at Supreme VIP.
MEXC charges 0.0000% maker on every spot pair and 0.0500% taker on major pairs, with the 20% MX deduction taking the taker rate to 0.0400% and no lock-up required.
At $500,000 of spot volume a month, a year of maker orders costs $6,000 on BingX and nothing on MEXC, and a year of taker orders costs $6,000 on BingX against $3,000 on MEXC, or $2,400 with the MX deduction.
On perpetuals, the same $500,000 of monthly taker notional costs $3,000 a year on BingX at 0.05% and $1,200 on MEXC's BTCUSDT Special Rate at 0.020%, or $2,400 on a standard MEXC contract at 0.040%.
Check the specific contract before you size a strategy, because MEXC's range tops out above BingX's flat rate on some pairs, and bot traders using the API pay MEXC's separate schedule.
Coins and Listing Pace: 879 Against 565
BingX describes itself as listing 1,100 or more spot assets on its own comparison page, and CoinGecko tracks 649 coins across 662 pairs as of September 3, 2026.
The same tracker shows 1,633 coins and 2,021 pairs on MEXC as of September 2, 2026.
Pace is the cleaner head-to-head.
CoinGecko's 2026 perpetuals report counted 879 new perpetual contracts on MEXC between January 2025 and April 2026, the most of any major centralised exchange, and 565 on BingX over the same window.
For a copier that number matters twice: a lead can only trade a contract that exists, and a copier can only follow a lead into a market the venue lists.
MEXC's listing calendar carries timestamps you can audit yourself.
MEXC vs BingX Beyond Crypto: TradFi Perpetuals Against Real Stocks
Both platforms now sell exposure to traditional markets, and they do it differently.
BingX offers TradFi perpetuals on gold, silver, oil, forex pairs, US stocks and indices, cites 125x to 150x on selected crypto perpetuals on its own page, and separately advertises up to 500x, a figure third-party data site Coinperps attributes to selected forex perpetuals.
BingX also lists bStocks tokenized stocks on spot, and its copy trading extends into its TradFi markets.
MEXC runs gold and oil perpetuals and US stock perpetuals up to 200x, and adds two things BingX does not: RealStocks, launched June 1, 2026 with more than 7,000 US stocks and ETFs held through a FINRA-registered broker, and native prediction markets, which we cover in our guide to trading Fed decisions.
MEXC's crypto perpetuals reach 500x on selected contracts, and our derivatives comparison sets out the leverage and pair counts across eight venues.
BingX vs MEXC on Security and Regulation: The 2024 Breach, Registrations and Warning Lists
At around 4:00 AM Singapore time on September 20, 2024, BingX detected unauthorised access to a hot wallet and suspended withdrawals and deposits, and CoinDesk reported on-chain data showing more than $43 million drained.
BingX's chief product officer said publicly that the loss was manageable and that any user losses would be covered, per Cointelegraph, and BingX said withdrawals for major assets resumed by the morning of September 21 and deposits by September 22, per BeInCrypto.
That is a breach handled in the open, and CoinGecko records no incident against BingX in the twelve months to September 2026.
On regulation, BingX's official disclaimer names the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Singapore, the Netherlands, Hong Kong, Macau and Mainland China among its restricted jurisdictions, CoinGecko records a Digital Currency Exchange registration in Australia, and Finance Magnates reported that BingX's EU entity had a MiCAR application pending with the Austrian regulator and no authorisation as of June 16, 2026.
MEXC publishes a monthly proof of reserves audited by Hacken and has no custodial breach on public record, which our security overview documents in full.
MEXC's regulatory position belongs here in plain words.
MEXC is not authorised under MiCA, appears on ESMA's register of non-compliant entities following a decision by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets dated September 16, 2025, was added to the UK FCA Warning List on March 22, 2024, appears on the Japan FSA's list of unregistered operators, and has been named on the Hong Kong SFC's list of suspicious virtual asset trading platforms.
MEXC stopped serving the EEA on July 1, 2026.
Where You Can Actually Use Each One
The two restricted lists overlap almost completely: neither platform serves the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong or Mainland China.
In the EEA, BingX's authorisation was pending as of June 16, 2026 and MEXC holds none, so EEA readers should compare platforms on ESMA's register rather than either of these two.
Copy trading availability is narrower than exchange availability on both platforms, so check the prohibited jurisdictions clause and the copy trading terms before funding an account.
Where BingX Is Still the Better Choice
Four things, and they are not small.
The roster: BingX's self-reported 400,000 or more elite traders is a pool MEXC does not match, and discovery filters matter when your strategy depends on finding one specific kind of trader.
The entry ticket and zero-slippage mode: perpetual copy starts from 20 USDT, and the optional zero-slippage mode is a direct answer to the execution gap that costs copiers the most.
Three copy markets: perpetual futures, standard futures and spot all run natively, with spot fixed at a flat 10% share, so a beginner can copy without leverage.
Risk metrics on the card: Sharpe ratio and maximum drawdown on public profiles are more than several larger venues show.
A fifth, smaller point: BingX's TradFi perpetual range across forex, indices and commodities is broader than MEXC's, even though MEXC answers with real stocks.
If any of those five is why you are on BingX, the honest advice is to stay.
MEXC or BingX: Who Should Choose Which
Your situation | Our answer |
You copy a top-tier lead and the profit share line bothers you | MEXC; a 10% default share and daily settlement on positive cumulative profit, about 377 USDT a year less on our 2,000 USDT example |
You want the widest choice of proven lead traders | BingX; the deeper roster and discovery filters |
You want to copy without leverage | BingX; spot copy at a flat 10% share, which MEXC does not offer |
You place resting spot orders when you are not copying | MEXC; 0.0000% maker on every pair against 0.1% |
You want to be early on new perpetual listings | MEXC; 879 new perpetuals in 16 months against 565 |
You want forex, index and commodity perpetuals with copy trading on top | BingX |
You want real US stocks or prediction markets beside your futures | MEXC RealStocks and event contracts, subject to your region |
You live in the US, UK, Canada or EEA | Neither; use a locally licensed venue |
Switching from BingX to MEXC in 3 Steps Without Stranding a Payout
Step 1. Close your copy positions and wait for settlement.
Stop copying, let open positions close, and wait for BingX's weekly Monday settlement to clear so that leaving mid-week does not strand a payment.
Step 2. Send a small test transfer.
Withdraw a small amount of USDT to your MEXC deposit address first, matching the network on both sides exactly and copying any memo or tag, because a missing memo is the single most common way transfers get stuck.
Step 3. Fund and set your limits before you follow anyone.
Set an account stop loss before you pick a trader, not after; our withdrawal guide covers the network mechanics and the copy trade tutorial covers the risk settings.
FAQ
Is MEXC better than BingX for copy trading?
On net returns from a given lead, yes: a 10% default share and lower published futures fees leave more with the copier.
On roster depth, entry ticket and zero-slippage mode, BingX is ahead.
Which has lower futures fees, MEXC or BingX?
MEXC, at 0.010% maker and 0.040% taker on standard contracts and 0.020% taker on BTCUSDT, against 0.02% and 0.05% on BingX.
Some MEXC contracts sit above BingX's flat rate, so check the pair.
How much do lead traders take on MEXC and BingX?
MEXC defaults to 10%, shown on each trader card.
BingX public leads take 8% to 32% by Elite tier, private mode allows 0% to 50%, and spot copy is fixed at 10%.
Is BingX safe after the 2024 hack?
BingX disclosed a hot wallet breach on September 20, 2024, restored withdrawals within days and said users would be compensated.
Judge any platform on published reserves, a protection fund and its documented recovery record.
Which lists more coins, MEXC or BingX?
MEXC, with 1,633 coins against 649 on CoinGecko's count as of September 2026.
BingX describes itself as listing 1,100 or more spot assets, which is a self-reported figure.
Can US or UK users use MEXC or BingX?
No, both platforms exclude the United States and the United Kingdom, and neither serves Canada.
Use a locally licensed exchange in your own jurisdiction instead.
How do I move from BingX to MEXC?
Close copy positions, wait for the weekly settlement, send a small test withdrawal on a matching network, then move the balance.
You can open an account and read each trader card's share before you follow anyone.
Risk Warning
Futures copy trading mirrors leveraged positions, and leverage can erase an entire allocation quickly through liquidation.
Past performance on any leaderboard does not predict future results, and IOSCO's 2025 final report warns that returns from imitative trading can be eroded by the transaction fees that frequent trading generates.
Fees, profit-share ratios and platform rules change, so confirm current terms on official pages before you allocate.
Neither platform serves residents of the United States, the United Kingdom or Canada, and MEXC is not authorised as a crypto-asset service provider under MiCA in the European Economic Area.
Nothing in this article is financial advice.
Fee data verified September 2 to 3, 2026 against MEXC's official fee page and profit share rules, and BingX's fee schedule support articles, VIP announcement and copy trading rule pages. Listing counts from CoinGecko exchange pages and its State of Crypto Perpetuals Report 2026. Our full scoring method is set out in our review methodology.
Market Opportunity
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.03342
$0.03342$0.03342
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
This article is provided by Sarah Chen for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets involve significant risk. Please conduct independent research or consult a qualified professional before making any investment decisions. The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of MEXC or its affiliates.
Popular Articles
View More
MEXC vs CoinEx: Fees, Coins, and What Each Platform Did After a Security Incident
MEXC is our top pick in this comparison on scale and cost, at 1,627 coins against 697 and 0.05% taker fees against 0.20%. Key Takeaways CoinGecko tracks 1,627 coins and 2,019 spot pairs on MEXC
MEXC vs HTX (Formerly Huobi): Who Shows You Their Reserves, and Who Still Charges 0.20% on Every Spot Trade?
MEXC is our top pick over HTX for active traders outside both platforms' prohibited regions in this comparison: 0% maker and 0.05% taker on spot against HTX's flat 0.20% at the entry tier, plus a
MEXC vs Coinbase: Which Costs Less on a $1,000 Trade, and Which One Can You Legally Use?
For traders outside the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the EEA, MEXC is our pick in this MEXC vs Coinbase comparison on one published number: 0.0000% maker and 0.0500% taker on major
Hot Crypto Updates
View More
Broadcom Earnings: AI Chip Revenue Triples as the Custom Silicon Race With Marvell Heats Up
Broadcom reported fiscal Q3 2026 revenue of $29.59 billion, up 86% year over year, while AI semiconductor revenue surged 221% to $16.7 billion. The company expects AI semiconductor revenue to
Who Is John Ternus? Apple's New CEO Takes Over From Tim Cook
Overview Apple has completed the most consequential leadership transition in its modern corporate history, with John Ternus, formerly Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, officially
SHEIN IPO Today: Why Is SHEIN Stock Down? Shares Fall Up to 10% on First Trading Day
SHEIN officially became a publicly traded company on September 1, 2026, completing one of the most closely watched consumer IPOs in recent years. But the SHEIN IPO started with sharp volatility.
Trending News
View More
Uniswap Pools.trade Launches on Robinhood Chain
Uniswap Labs introduced Uniswap Pools.trade on August 5, 2026, expanding its presence on Robinhood Chain from decentralized trading infrastructure into token creation, distribution, and liquidity form
Wintermute broker-dealer enters U.S. markets
Wintermute USA has registered as a broker-dealer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and become a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, creating a regulated foundation fo
Related Articles
View MoreMEXC vs CoinEx: Fees, Coins, and What Each Platform Did After a Security Incident
MEXC is our top pick in this comparison on scale and cost, at 1,627 coins against 697 and 0.05% taker fees against 0.20%.Key TakeawaysCoinGecko tracks 1,627 coins and 2,019 spot pairs on MEXC against
MEXC vs XT.COM: We Checked Volume, Reserves and Spread on Both
MEXC is our top pick in this comparison for long-tail spot trading, at 1,627 coins against 636 and 0.00% maker fees against 0.20%.Key TakeawaysCoinGecko tracks 1,627 coins and 2,019 spot pairs on MEXC
MEXC vs Bithumb 2026: Is 0.001 BTC the Fee or the Minimum?
For traders outside South Korea, MEXC is the better choice in this comparison, because Bithumb's account opening runs through a Korean real-name bank account and the fee schedule you came to compare i
