Unexpected Web3 Development Challenges: Solutions from the Field

An unexpected obstacle for enterprises developing systems using Web3 is immutability, or the inability to make changes to their codebase, which causes complications with operational risk. Most software allows for the update of a company’s code after it has been deployed due to bugs and changes in business practices, but smart contracts are designed to be “static” or unchangeable at the time of deployment; if a company needs to update their smart contract after it has been deployed, they cannot access it. Companies needing flexibility will typically overlook the issue of immutability during their original planning phase.

To solve this problem, we created a modular structure that creates a separation of state and logic with a proxy pattern. Our design separates an end-user-facing contract address from its underlying implementation, allowing for any modifications (updating security and adding features) without having to deal with the migration of user accounts. The key takeaway for any enterprise entering the space would be to build for growth and changes, versus creating a monument to the first deployment.

One unexpected challenge we faced while developing ChainClarity in the Web3 space was the overwhelming complexity of the terminology and concepts inherent to blockchain and crypto technology. As we sought to create a platform that simplifies access to this information, we quickly realized that many users, including potential investors, found technical jargon a significant barrier to entry. This was particularly evident when analyzing over 560 protocol whitepapers, which are often dense and filled with specialized language that can alienate newcomers.

To address this challenge, we implemented a dual-approach strategy: first, we focused on creating plain-English analyses of each whitepaper, distilling complex concepts into easily digestible content. For instance, our team systematically broke down terms like “decentralized finance” and “layer-2 solutions,” using real-world analogies and practical applications to enable better understanding. Additionally, we utilized our expertise in AI-powered content strategies to refine our educational materials, ensuring they are not only precise but also tailored to meet the needs of different user demographics.

Moreover, we employed an SEO-driven publishing strategy to enhance visibility and reach of our educational resources. By targeting keywords and questions that potential investors commonly search for, we ensured that our content not only educated but also attracted traffic and engagement. This multi-faceted approach has allowed us to turn a potential obstacle–the complexity of crypto education–into a cornerstone of our mission, helping demystify this innovative space for countless individuals.

One thing that caught us off guard in Web3 development was how much user trust and onboarding affected adoption compared to the underlying technology itself.

From the engineering side, building the functionality was often manageable. The harder part was designing flows that didn’t confuse users once wallets, approvals, transaction signatures, and network switching entered the experience. Even technically solid products created friction if users weren’t fully confident about what they were approving or where assets were moving.

A lot of the adjustments ended up being around simplifying the experience, improving transaction clarity, and reducing unnecessary complexity during onboarding instead of focusing only on the blockchain infrastructure underneath.