The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,… The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,…

Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack

On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads.

The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens.

Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry.

The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign.

The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog.

Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack.

Technical evolution and destructive payload

The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.
The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts.

Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines.

The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory.

Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload.

Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure.

AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser, and @asyncapi/generator.

PostHog followed at 4:11 AM UTC, with infected versions of posthog-js, posthog-node, and dozens of plugins. Postman packages arrived at 5:09 AM UTC.

The Zapier compromise affected @zapier/zapier-sdk, zapier-platform-cli, and zapier-platform-core, while the ENS compromise affected @ensdomains/ensjs, @ensdomains/ens-contracts, and ethereum-ens.

GitHub branch creation suggests repository-level access

The AsyncAPI team discovered a malicious branch in their CLI repository created immediately before the compromised packages appeared on npm.

The branch contained a deployed version of the Shai-Hulud malware, indicating the attacker gained write access to the repository itself rather than simply hijacking npm tokens.

This escalation mirrors the technique used in the original Nx compromise, in which attackers modified source repositories to inject malicious code into legitimate build pipelines.

Aikido estimates that 26,300 GitHub repositories now contain stolen credentials marked with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description.

The repositories contain secrets exposed by developer environments that ran the compromised packages, including cloud service credentials, CI/CD tokens, and authentication keys for third-party APIs.

The public nature of the leaks amplifies the damage: any attacker monitoring the repositories can harvest credentials in real time and launch secondary attacks.

Attack timing and mitigation

The timing coincides with npm’s Nov. 15 announcement that it will revoke classic authentication tokens on Dec. 9.

The attacker’s choice to launch a final large-scale campaign before the deadline suggests they recognized the window for token-based compromises was closing. Aikido’s timeline shows the first Shai-Hulud wave began Sept. 16.

The Nov. 24 “Second Coming” represents the attacker’s last opportunity to exploit legacy tokens before npm’s migration cuts off that access.

Aikido recommends that security teams audit all dependencies from affected ecosystems, particularly the Zapier, ENS, AsyncAPI, PostHog, and Postman packages installed or updated after Nov. 24.

Organizations should rotate all GitHub, npm, cloud, and CI/CD secrets used in environments where these packages were present, and search GitHub for repositories with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description to determine if internal credentials were exposed.

Disabling npm postinstall scripts in CI pipelines prevents future install-time execution, and pinning package versions with lock files limits exposure to newly compromised releases.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/malicious-worm-compromises-crypto-domains-in-supply-chain-attack/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav integrates Chainlink oracles to deliver neutral on-chain NAV, restoring trust during volatile DeFi markets. October shocks exposed DeFi operating without
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/21 17:51
SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

The SEC has filed proposed final consent judgments against former FTX executives. Key figures involved include Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/21 18:06
SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

The post SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu investors uneasy as Kusama’s silence fuels leadership concerns. SHIB slid 13% in three days, retracing from $0.00001484 to $0.00001305. Shibarium exploit and Kusama’s absence have weighed on investor trust. Shiba Inu investors are voicing concerns about the project’s long-term direction as leadership uncertainty and slow ecosystem progress erode confidence.  The token, which rallied from its meme-coin origins to become the second-largest meme asset by market cap, counts more than 1.5 million holders worldwide. But as SHIB matures, the gap between early hype and current delivery has widened.  The project’s transition into an “ecosystem coin” with spin-off projects and Shibarium, its layer-2 network, once raised expectations. Analysts now point to internal challenges as the main factor holding SHIB back from fulfilling that potential. Kusama’s Silence Adds to Instability Central to the debate is the role of Shytoshi Kusama, Shiba Inu’s pseudonymous lead developer. Investors are concerned about the intermittent disappearance of the project’s lead developer, who repeatedly takes unannounced social media breaks.  For instance, Kusama went silent on X for over a month before resurfacing this week amid growing speculation that he had abandoned the Shiba Inu project.  Kusama returned shortly after the Shibarium bridge suffered an exploit worth around $3 million. However, he did not directly address the issue but only reassured Shiba Inu community members of his commitment to advancing the project.  Although most community members didn’t complain about Kusama’s anonymity in the project’s initial stages, his recent behavior has raised concerns. Many are beginning to develop trust issues, particularly because nobody could reveal the SHIB developer’s identity for the past five years. He has conducted all communications under pseudonyms. SHIB Price Action Reflects Sentiment Shift Market reaction has mirrored the doubts. SHIB, which spiked 26% at the start of September, has since reversed. Over the last…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:13