Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.Author: fabiano.sol Compiled by: Tim, PANews There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but: Who is conducting 100% buybacks? Who destroys the tokens after the buyback? A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program. 1.deBridge deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced. To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year. 2. Marinede Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens. Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million. The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO. 3. Jupiter Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens. They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply. Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens. 4. Jito The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them. Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply). 5. Bonk Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures. In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK. The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them. 6. Metaplex 50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks. In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply. 7. Raydium Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million). Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens. This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply. 8. Pump Fun The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens. In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year. 9. Streamflow 39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers. Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions. Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Solana Ecosystem Buyback Guide: Decoding the Buyback Mechanisms and Real Impact of 9 Major Projects

2025/10/30 16:25

Author: fabiano.sol

Compiled by: Tim, PANews

There are over a dozen projects on Solana that are currently undergoing buybacks, but:

  • Who is conducting 100% buybacks?
  • Who destroys the tokens after the buyback?

A complete guide to Solana's ecosystem buyback program.

1.deBridge

deBridge is using 100% of its revenue to buy back its own tokens, and the specific handling plan after the buyback is yet to be announced.

To date, they have repurchased 3% of the token supply. At this rate, they will be able to repurchase nearly 20% of the circulating supply within a year.

2. Marinede

Marinade uses 50% of its monthly revenue to buy back MNDE tokens.

Marinade boasts an annualized revenue of $170 million, which could generate significant buying interest for a token with a market capitalization of only $140 million.

The future use of these repurchased tokens will be determined by the DAO.

3. Jupiter

Jupiter is using 50% of its protocol revenue to buy back its own tokens.

They transferred the repurchased tokens to a burn address. To date, Jupiter has repurchased 95 million JUP tokens, representing 1.37% of the total supply.

Tomorrow we will discuss a plan for handling the repurchased tokens.

4. Jito

The Jito platform will use 1.5% of TipRouter fees to periodically buy back JTO tokens and then burn them.

Based on current market prices, this move will result in the repurchase and burning of more than 11 million JTO tokens annually (representing 1.1% of the total supply).

5. Bonk

Bonk has introduced several token buyback and burn measures.

In this case, I will only focus on LetsBONK.

The LetsBONK project will use 50% of its revenue to buy back BONK tokens from the open market and burn them.

6. Metaplex

50% of the protocol's revenue will be allocated to the DAO each month, specifically for MTPLX token buybacks.

In the past 30 days, the Metaplex protocol has generated $1.56 million in revenue, of which 50% (i.e., $780,000) was used to buy back approximately 3.5 million MPLX tokens for the Metaplex DAO, representing more than 0.3% of the total supply.

7. Raydium

Raydium tokens have an extremely low annual issuance of only 1.9 million (total supply is 555 million).

Raydium will use 12% of its transaction fees to buy back RAY tokens.

This brings the repurchase ratio to 5% of the current circulating supply.

8. Pump Fun

The Pump.fun platform currently generates over $1 million in daily revenue and uses 100% of that revenue to buy back tokens.

In September, they bought back $55 million worth of PUMP tokens, which would allow them to buy back approximately 30% of the circulating supply within a year.

9. Streamflow

39% of the Streamflow protocol's revenue is being used to buy back STREAM tokens and distribute them to stakers.

Taking July 2025 as an example, this means that 39% of the $247,000 in revenue that month (i.e., $96,330) will be used for STREAM token buybacks and staking reward distributions.

Recently, Magic Eden also launched a token buyback mechanism, which has repurchased 111,000 ME tokens and will use them all for staking rewards (the scale is expected to expand further in the future). Step Finance has also invested all of its platform revenue (including revenue from businesses such as Solanafloor and Remora Markets) into token buybacks.

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.07471
$0.07471$0.07471
+0.68%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav integrates Chainlink oracles to deliver neutral on-chain NAV, restoring trust during volatile DeFi markets. October shocks exposed DeFi operating without
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/21 17:51
SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

The SEC has filed proposed final consent judgments against former FTX executives. Key figures involved include Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/21 18:06
SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

The post SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu investors uneasy as Kusama’s silence fuels leadership concerns. SHIB slid 13% in three days, retracing from $0.00001484 to $0.00001305. Shibarium exploit and Kusama’s absence have weighed on investor trust. Shiba Inu investors are voicing concerns about the project’s long-term direction as leadership uncertainty and slow ecosystem progress erode confidence.  The token, which rallied from its meme-coin origins to become the second-largest meme asset by market cap, counts more than 1.5 million holders worldwide. But as SHIB matures, the gap between early hype and current delivery has widened.  The project’s transition into an “ecosystem coin” with spin-off projects and Shibarium, its layer-2 network, once raised expectations. Analysts now point to internal challenges as the main factor holding SHIB back from fulfilling that potential. Kusama’s Silence Adds to Instability Central to the debate is the role of Shytoshi Kusama, Shiba Inu’s pseudonymous lead developer. Investors are concerned about the intermittent disappearance of the project’s lead developer, who repeatedly takes unannounced social media breaks.  For instance, Kusama went silent on X for over a month before resurfacing this week amid growing speculation that he had abandoned the Shiba Inu project.  Kusama returned shortly after the Shibarium bridge suffered an exploit worth around $3 million. However, he did not directly address the issue but only reassured Shiba Inu community members of his commitment to advancing the project.  Although most community members didn’t complain about Kusama’s anonymity in the project’s initial stages, his recent behavior has raised concerns. Many are beginning to develop trust issues, particularly because nobody could reveal the SHIB developer’s identity for the past five years. He has conducted all communications under pseudonyms. SHIB Price Action Reflects Sentiment Shift Market reaction has mirrored the doubts. SHIB, which spiked 26% at the start of September, has since reversed. Over the last…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:13