U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
U.S. Community Banks Push to Close GENIUS Act Stablecoin “Yield Loophole”
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
News Brief
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
Summary
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
What Banks Are Objecting To
- Stablecoin yield products offered by exchanges
- Ability to provide interest‑like returns without being banks
- Potential for consumers to treat yield‑bearing stablecoins as deposit substitutes
Banks argue this activity looks economically similar to deposits but operates outside the full banking regulatory framework.
Why This Matters
- Competitive pressure: Yield‑bearing stablecoins can attract funds away from community banks
- Regulatory boundary debate: Where to draw the line between payments, securities, and banking
- Policy precedent: How this issue is resolved could shape the future of on‑chain finance in the U.S.
At stake is whether stablecoin issuers and exchanges can compete on yield without bank charters.
The Counterargument
Crypto advocates contend that:
- Stablecoin yields often come from market activity or reserves, not lending deposits
- Users are not guaranteed principal the same way bank deposits are
- Innovation should not be constrained to protect incumbents
They argue consumer disclosure—not prohibition—is the right approach.
Broader Implications
- Could influence final GENIUS Act language
- May determine whether stablecoins evolve into cash‑like instruments or yield‑bearing financial products
- Signals rising tension as crypto competes directly with traditional banking services
Bottom Line
Community banks’ push to close the GENIUS Act’s stablecoin yield “loophole” highlights a core conflict: stablecoins are starting to compete with bank deposits. How lawmakers respond will shape whether yield remains a feature of U.S.‑regulated stablecoins—or is pushed back into the traditional banking system.
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
You May Also Like
Stablecoin market hits $312B as banks, card networks embrace onchain dollars
Finance
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
Share
Coindesk2026/03/10 22:48
How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings
The post How to earn from cloud mining: IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform unlocks genuine passive earnings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. contributor Posted: September 17, 2025 As digital assets continue to reshape global finance, cloud mining has become one of the most effective ways for investors to generate stable passive income. Addressing the growing demand for simplicity, security, and profitability, IeByte has officially upgraded its fully automated cloud mining platform, empowering both beginners and experienced investors to earn Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and other mainstream cryptocurrencies without the need for hardware or technical expertise. Why cloud mining in 2025? Traditional crypto mining requires expensive hardware, high electricity costs, and constant maintenance. In 2025, with blockchain networks becoming more competitive, these barriers have grown even higher. Cloud mining solves this by allowing users to lease professional mining power remotely, eliminating the upfront costs and complexity. IeByte stands at the forefront of this transformation, offering investors a transparent and seamless path to daily earnings. IeByte’s upgraded auto-cloud mining platform With its latest upgrade, IeByte introduces: Full Automation: Mining contracts can be activated in just one click, with all processes handled by IeByte’s servers. Enhanced Security: Bank-grade encryption, cold wallets, and real-time monitoring protect every transaction. Scalable Options: From starter packages to high-level investment contracts, investors can choose the plan that matches their goals. Global Reach: Already trusted by users in over 100 countries. Mining contracts for 2025 IeByte offers a wide range of contracts tailored for every investor level. From entry-level plans with daily returns to premium high-yield packages, the platform ensures maximum accessibility. Contract Type Duration Price Daily Reward Total Earnings (Principal + Profit) Starter Contract 1 Day $200 $6 $200 + $6 + $10 bonus Bronze Basic Contract 2 Days $500 $13.5 $500 + $27 Bronze Basic Contract 3 Days $1,200 $36 $1,200 + $108 Silver Advanced Contract 1 Day $5,000 $175 $5,000 + $175 Silver Advanced Contract 2 Days $8,000 $320 $8,000 + $640 Silver…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:48
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias
Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15