I didn't expect the last post to spark such a discussion. We were essentially talking about the same thing, but everyone described the numbers slightly differentlyI didn't expect the last post to spark such a discussion. We were essentially talking about the same thing, but everyone described the numbers slightly differently

The AI Era: When the "Difference Between Humans and Dogs" Shrinks to the "Difference Between Humans"

2025/12/23 11:00

I didn't expect the last post to spark such a discussion. We were essentially talking about the same thing, but everyone described the numbers slightly differently.

Everyone has heard the saying that the difference between people is sometimes greater than the difference between people and dogs. But this saying came about before the current wave of AI.

Today I'll try to talk about this in a quantitative way. The numbers are just something I came up with on a whim, just to make you laugh, so don't take it too seriously.

Let's say a primary school student's cognitive ability is 10 points, a PhD student's is 60 points, a university professor's is 75 points, and Einstein's is 100 points.

The difference between 10 points and 100 points is indeed huge, a difference of 10x, which is comparable to the difference between a human and a dog.

In 2025, AI's cognitive value will be at least 40 points. Considering that AI requires general knowledge, while PhDs and professors are generally specialists, AI's actual value could at least double to 80 points.

Therefore, we have:

-Elementary school student + AI = 90 points

- PhD + AI = 140 points

-University professor + AI = 155 points

- Einstein + AI = 180 points

With AI, the absolute gap between elementary school students and Einstein remains 90 points, but the relative gap has decreased from 10x to 2x.

This is my view: AI is narrowing the gap between humans.

Some might object: That's not right, elementary school students certainly can't compare to university professors in terms of AI development.

Just like in One Piece, the characters develop their Devil Fruit abilities to varying degrees. Even with the same Gum-Gum Fruit, Luffy using Gear 1 would definitely lose to Luffy using Gear 4 many years later (a novice versus a seasoned expert).

Indeed, if AI is worth 80 points:

-People who don't know how to use it (like occasionally asking a question) can only perform at 20% capacity;

- People who are very good at using AI (such as high-intensity Vibe Coding) can overclock and get even 100 points.

so:

-Elementary school student + AI novice = 30 points

Einstein + AI expert = 200 points

The gap has widened from 90 points to 170 points, so with AI, the differences between people have actually increased!

These are the views of teachers Lao Bai and Alvin, and they are not wrong.

However, I must say this: although my views and those of the two teachers seem to conflict, their core principles are similar. Why is that?

Because I assume that AI will continue to evolve:

First, become smarter;

Second, it becomes easier to use.

2025 is just a transitional year. As time goes on, becoming a Prompt engineer will become easier and easier, the threshold will become lower and lower, and it will become "just need to talk to someone". Learning how to use AI will definitely become easier, not harder.

Let's assume that after AI becomes smarter, it might reach a score of 240, and then the development level, from low to high, will be 200, 240, and 280 points respectively.

So:

-For elementary school students, the answer is 10 + 200 = 210 points.

Einstein's score was 100 + 280 = 380.

The difference between the two is 170 points, but it's no longer 2x, only 1.8x. The absolute value difference has increased, but the relative value has decreased.

What about 10 years from now? Let's assume, in a super optimistic scenario, that AI's cognitive abilities evolve to around 1000 points.

So at this point:

- Elementary school student 1010 points

- Einstein 1100 points

(If that day ever comes) even Einstein wouldn't be able to differentiate himself from an elementary school student.

Many people believe that the advent of AI has widened the gap between humans, but I think this is only a temporary situation. Because AI is still in its early stages, people's understanding and development of AI varies greatly.

But AI has replaced writers, illustrators, dancers, artists... one by one these professions have fallen, so why are you worried that AI can't replace the training teachers who "teach people how to 100% develop AI's potential"?

Come on, this is what they do for a living.

In the future, it will be the norm for humans to develop and utilize 80%-120% of the potential of AI, rather than an isolated case.

The smarter AI becomes, the less human intervention is needed, and the smaller the gap between people becomes.

It's like two martial arts masters suddenly discovering that they are allowed to use shoulder-mounted rocket launchers to bombard each other. What difference does it make if one of them has practiced martial arts for 10 years and the other has practiced swordsmanship for 15 years?

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03824
$0.03824$0.03824
+1.37%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Ripple IPO Back in Spotlight as Valuation Hits $50B

Ripple IPO Back in Spotlight as Valuation Hits $50B

The post Ripple IPO Back in Spotlight as Valuation Hits $50B appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Ripple, the blockchain payments company behind XRP, is once
Share
CoinPedia2025/12/27 14:24
Solana co-founder predicts that by 2026: the stablecoin market will exceed one trillion US dollars, and 100,000 humanoid robots will be shipped.

Solana co-founder predicts that by 2026: the stablecoin market will exceed one trillion US dollars, and 100,000 humanoid robots will be shipped.

PANews reported on December 27th that Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana, released some predictions about 2026 on X, as follows: The total size of stablecoins
Share
PANews2025/12/27 15:04