Illinois Governor Pritzker signed a 0.2% digital asset tax targeting crypto exchanges, transfers, and custody, with no equivalent for stocks.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has signed Article 3 of SB 3019, the Digital Asset Privilege Tax Act, into law.

The legislation imposes a 0.2% tax on digital asset exchange, transfer, and custody activities.
Illinois residents who buy Bitcoin, move crypto between wallets, or store assets on platforms like Coinbase now face new tax liabilities.
The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) called it the most punitive digital asset tax in the country. No other U.S. state has adopted a comparable transaction-based tax on digital assets.
The law taxes customers directly for using digital asset services. Unlike income or capital gains taxes, this targets the activity itself.
A resident buying Bitcoin pays the tax. A resident holding crypto in a custodial account also pays the tax.
CCI noted the law contains no meaningful exemptions for common actions like transferring assets between a user’s own accounts.
Illinois residents bear these costs simply for participating in the digital asset market.
CCI’s letter to Governor Pritzker highlighted a key disparity. No comparable state financial transaction tax exists anywhere in the U.S. for stocks, bonds, or derivatives.
An investor who transfers or holds a stock in paper form pays no such tax. That same transaction, if recorded on a blockchain, now triggers a liability in Illinois.
CCI argued this singles out digital assets based solely on the technology processing the transaction. Miles Jennings, writing on X, compared it to taxing email correspondence over postal mail.
CCI warned the law could drive builders and users out of Illinois. The group cited the state’s growing startup community as a casualty of the new tax regime.
Illinois recently passed the Digital Assets and Consumer Protection Act (DACPA), which industry groups praised as a constructive regulatory approach.
CCI’s letter noted businesses are still preparing for DACPA’s implementation and that Congress is actively advancing a national digital asset tax framework.
The group urged Illinois to wait for federal consensus rather than create a fragmented state-level tax policy.
CCI argued the law moved forward without meaningful stakeholder input, calling the process a significant concern for a first-of-its-kind industry tax.
The post This Illinois Bitcoin Tax Law Could Cost Crypto Holders More appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.


